Skip to main content
Log in

Fruit and pedicel characters derived from Galápagos Tomatoes’

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By relatively simple breeding procedures, seven different modifications of fruit and pedicel have been successfully transferred from wild tomatoes of the Galápagos Islands to large-fruited cultivars. Some of these traits, the majority of which are simply inherited, may have horticultural value. Such introgression from the wild forms is expedited by the remarkable freedom from barriers at any stage of the breeding processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Butler, L. 1936. Inherited characters in the tomato. II. Jointless pedicel. Jour. Hered.27: 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanna, G. C., A. Gentile, P. G. Smith, and L. F. Lippert. 1964. Recently developed vegetable varieties. Calif. Agr.18(3): 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkins, J. A. and G. Mackinney. 1955. Carotenoids of the apricot tomato and its hybrid with yellow and tangerine. Genetics40: 715–720.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Joubert, T. G. La G. 1965. A third jointless gene in tomatoes. S. Afr. Jour. Sci.8: 571–582.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mackinney, G., C. M. Rick, and J. A. Jenkins. 1954. Carotenoid differences inLycopersicon: hybrids of an unusual race ofL. pimpinellifolium. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.8: 695–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rick, C. M. 1956. Genetic and systematic studies on accessions ofLycopersicon from the Galápagos Islands. Amer. Jour. Bot.43: 687–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. —. 1963. Biosystematic studies on Galápagos tomatoes. Occ. Papers Calif. Acad. Sci.44: 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  9. —, and L. Butler. 1956. Cytogenetics of the tomato. Advances in Genetics8: 267–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. —, and P. G. Smith. 1953. Novel variations in tomato species hybrids. Amer. Nat.87: 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwanitz, F. 1957. Die Entstehung der Kulturpflanzen. Springer. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tal, M. 1965. Estimation of genetic differences betweenLycopersicon esculentum andSolanum pennellii. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Calif., Davis, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Various aspects of this work have been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation. The Galápagos parents were collected under the auspices of a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the competent assistance of Dora G. Hunt and Dr. John E. Boynton; receipt of many invaluable collections from Sr. Miguel Castro, Conservation Officer, Charles Darwin Station, Galápagos, Ecuador; and analyses of fruit pigments by Dr. Gordon Mackinney, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rick, C.M. Fruit and pedicel characters derived from Galápagos Tomatoes’. Econ Bot 21, 171–184 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897867

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897867

Keywords

Navigation