Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

The function of allogrooming in domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus); a study in a group of cats living in confinement

  • Ruud van den Bos
Article

Abstract

Grooming interactions (n=83) occurring in a group of non free-ranging adult neutered male (n=14) and female (n=11) domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) were analysed. Grooming was not induced by the proximity (distance <=0.5 m) of another animal. Grooming was in general directed at the head-neck area. Higher ranking animals groomed lower ranking animals more often than the other way round. Groomers tended to adopt ‘higher’ (standing, sitting upright) postures than groomees (sitting, lying). Agonistic behaviour occurred in 35% of interactions. Groomers showed offensive behaviour more often than groomees, most often after grooming a partner. Furthermore groomers often groomed themselves after grooming a partner. The degree of relatedness of animals did not affect the frequencies or durations of grooming. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that allogrooming in domestic cats may be a way of redirecting (potential) aggression in situations in which overt aggression is too costly.

Keywords

Felis Overt Aggression Offensive Behaviour Ranking Animal Lower Ranking Animal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aureli, F. & C.P. van Schaik 1991 Post-conflict behaviour in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis): II. coping with the uncertainty.Ethology 89: 101–114.Google Scholar
  2. Boccia, M. L., M. Reite & M. Laudenslager 1989 On the physiology of grooming in a pigtail macaque.Physiol. Behav. 45: 667–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bos, van den R. 1995a Enige inzichten in het sociale gedrag van katten.Biotechniek 34: 27–31.Google Scholar
  4. Bos, van den R. 1995b Recent insights in cat social behaviour.ANZCCART News 8(4): 5–6.Google Scholar
  5. Bos, van den R. 1996 Post conflict behaviour in domestic cats in confinement, Proceedings of International Society for Anthrozoology Meeting in Cambridge, UK, 24–26th July 1996, p.65.Google Scholar
  6. Bos, van den R. & Tj. de Cock Buning 1994a Social behaviour of domestic cats (Felis lybica forma catus L.): A study of dominance in a group of female laboratory cats.Ethology 98: 14–37.Google Scholar
  7. Bos, van den R. & Tj. de Cock Buning 1994b Social and non-social behaviour of domestic cats (Felis catus L.): a review of literature and experimental findings. In: (Bunyan, J (ed.)Welfare and Science Royal Society of Medicine Press London pp.53–57.Google Scholar
  8. Bos, van den R & H. de Vries 1996 Clusters in social behaviour of female domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) living in confinement.J. Ethol. 14: 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradshaw, J.W.S. 1992 The Behaviour of the Domestic Cat. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  10. Bradshaw, J.W. & S.L. Brown 1992 Social behaviour of cats. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde vol 117 Suppl. 1, pp.54S-56S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, S.L. 1993 The Social Behaviour of Neutered Domestic Cats (Felis catus), PhD Thesis University of Southampton. Southampton, U.K.Google Scholar
  12. Feh, C. & de J. Mazieres 1993 Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses.Anim. Behav. 46: 1191–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goosen, C. 1980 On grooming in Old World monkeys, PhD Thesis University of Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  14. Grant, E.C. 1963 The analysis of the social behaviour of the male laboratory rat.Behaviour 21: 260–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrison, C.J.O. 1964 Allopreening as agonistic behaviour.Behaviour 24: 161–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart, B.L. & L.A. Hart 1992 Reciprocal allogrooming in impala,Aepyceros melampus.Anim. Behav. 44: 1073–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hemelrijk, C.K. 1990 Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level.Anim. Behav. 39: 1013–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hemelrijk, C.K. & A. Ek 1991 Reciprocity and interchange of grooming and ‘support’ in captive chimpanzees.Anim. Behav. 41: 923–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hooff, van J.A.R.A.M. & J.A.B. Wensing 1987 Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive wolf pack, In:Man and Wolf (Frank, H. ed.) Junk Publishers, Dordrecht pp.219–252.Google Scholar
  20. Kappeler, P. & C.P. van Schaik 1992 Methodological and evolutionary aspects of reconciliation among primates.Ethology 92: 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krebs, J.R. & N.B. Davies 1993 An introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edition Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Leyhausen, P. 1979 Cat Behavior; The Predatory and Social Behavior of Domestic and Wild Cats. Garland STPM Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
  23. Liberg, O. & M. Sandell, 1988 Spatial organization and reproductive tactics in the domestic cats and other felids. In: The Domestic Cat: the Biology of its Behaviour. (Turner, D.C. & Bateson, P., eds.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
  24. Macdonald, D.W., P.J. Apps, G.M. Carr & G. Kerby 1987 Social dynamics, nursing coalitions and infanticide among farm cats,Felis catus.Adv. Ethology 28: 1–66.Google Scholar
  25. Maestripieri, D., G. Schino, F. Aureli & A. Troisi 1992 A modest proposal: displacement activities as an indicator of emotions in primates.Anim. Behav. 44: 967–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mooring, M.S. & B.L. Hart 1993 Effects of relatedness, dominance, age and association on reciprocal allogrooming by captive impala.Ethology 94: 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Natoli, E. & E. de Vito 1991 Agonistic behaviour, dominance rank and copulatory success in a large multi-male feral cat,Felis catus L., colony in central Rome.Anim. Behav. 42: 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Brien, T.G. 1993 Allogrooming behaviour among adult female wedge-capped capuchin monkeys.Anim. Behav. 46: 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Podberscek, A.L., J.K. Blackshaw & A.W. Beattie 1991 The behaviour of laboratory colony cats and their reactions to a familiar and unfamiliar person.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 31: 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seyfarth, R.M. 1976 Social relationships among adult female baboons.Anim. Behav. 24: 917–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seyfarth, R.M. 1977 A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys.J. Theor. Biol. 65: 671–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seyfarth, R.M. 1980 The distribution of grooming and related behaviours among adult female vervet monkeys.Anim. Behav. 28: 798–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, D.F.E., K.J. Durman, D.B. Roy & J.W.S. Bradshaw 1994 Behavioural aspects of the welfare of rescued cats.J. Feline Advisory Bureau 31: 25–28.Google Scholar
  34. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf 1981 Biometry; The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd edition, W.H. Freeman & Co., New York.Google Scholar
  35. Spruijt, B.M., J.A.R.A.M. van Hooff & W.H. Gispen 1992 Ethology and neurobiology of grooming behavior.Physiol. Rev. 72: 825–852.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Terry, R.L. 1970 Primate grooming as a tension reduction mechanism.J. Psychol. 76: 129–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Troisi, A. & G. Schino 1986 Diurnal and climatic influences on allogrooming behaviour in a captive group of Java monkeys.Anim. Behav. 34: 1420–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Troisi, A. & G. Schino 1987 Environmental and social influences on autogrooming behaviour in a captive group of Java monkeys.Behaviour 100: 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Troisi, A., G. Schino & F. Aureli 1989 Allogrooming and inter-individual proximity in two species of macaques (macaca fascicularis and m. nemestrina).Behaviour 111: 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UK Cat Behaviour Working Group 1991 An Ethogram for Behavioural Studies of the Domestic Cat (Felis catus L.), UFAW Animal Workshop Report No. 1, UFAW Potters Bar, U.K.Google Scholar
  41. Willemse, T., M. Mudde, M. Josephy & B.M. Spruijt 1994 The effect of haloperidol and naloxone on excessive grooming behavior of cats.Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 4: 39–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Willemse, T. & B.M. Spruijt 1995 Preliminary evidence for dopaminergic involvement in stress-induced excessive grooming in cats,Neurosci. Res. Comm. 17: 203–208.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, E.O. 1975 Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassachuttesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruud van den Bos
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Anthrozoology Institute, Dept. BiologyUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Dept. of Ethics, History and Alternatives of Animal ExperimentsUniversity of LeidenLeidenthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations