Skip to main content
Log in

The thresholds of change model: An approach to analyzing stages of change data

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Stage models are prominent in research describing health behavior change. Since stage models often propose that different factors have varying influences on membership in the different stage, statistical methods that can estimate the thresholds that separate the stages and the relative value of variables in influencing these thresholds are useful. This article describes use of a “thresholds of change” model for analyzing the thresholds separating stages and specifically for examining the effects of explanatory variables on these thresholds using a generalization of an ordinal logistic (or probit) regression model. Data from a skin cancer prevention study (N=3,185) in which participants were grouped into three stages for sunscreen use (precontemplation, contemplation, and action) are used to illustrate the Thresholds of Change Model. For this example, two thresholds exist: a contemplation (between precontemplation and contemplation) and an action threshold (between contemplation and action). Variables examined include gender, skin type, perceived susceptibility to sunburn, worry about skin cancer, and sun protection self-efficacy. We examine models that assume that the effects of these variables are the same across thresholds, and then allow the effects of these variables to vary across thresholds. Results indicate that perceived susceptibility has an equal effect on both thresholds, but that worry and self-efficacy have differential effects: worry exerts a greater influence on the contemplation threshold, whereas self-efficacy has a significantly stronger effect on the action threshold. Gender also has a stronger effect on the action threshold; males were less likely to be classified in the action stage than females. This analytic approach has broad applications to many types of stage data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente C: Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983,51:390–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prochaska JO, DiClemente C, Norcross J: In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.American Psychologist. 1992,47:1102–1114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Flay B: Youth tobacco use: Risks, patterns, and control. In Slade J, Orleans CT (eds),Nicotine Addiction: Principles and Management. New York: Oxford Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bock RD:Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Long JS:Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson B, Harrell FE: Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables.Applied Statistics. 1990,39:205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Terza J: Ordinal probit: A generalization.Communications in Statistics. 1985,14:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McKelvey RD, Zavoina W: A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables.Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1975,4:103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Winship C, Mare RD: Regression models with ordinal variables.American Sociological Review. 1984,49:512–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ: A multilevel thresholds of change model for analysis of stages of change data.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1998,33:427–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins LM, Wugalter SE: Latent class models for stage-sequential dynamic latent variables.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1992,27:131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin RA, Velicer WF, Fava JL: Latent transition analysis applied to the stages of change for smoking cessation.Addictive Behaviors. 1996,21:67–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Velicer WF, Martin RA, Collins LM: Latent transition analysis for longitudinal data.Addiction. 1996,91 (Suppl.): S197-S209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Collins LM, Wugalter SE, Rousculp SS:LTA User's Manual. Los Angeles: J. P. Guilford Laboratory of Quantiative Psychology, University of Southern California, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Agresti A:Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Little RJA: Modeling the drop-out mechanism in repeated-measures studies.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1995,90:1112–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD: Application of random-effects patternmixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies.Psychological Methods. 1997,2:64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitzpatrick TB: Soleil et peau.Journal of Medical Esthetics. 1975,2:33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Silvey SD:Statistical Inference. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wald A: Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations in large.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 1943,54:426–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Greene WH:LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual. Bellport, NY: Econometric Software, Inc., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD: MIXOR: A computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 1996,49:157–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCullagh P: Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 1980,42:109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Sutton SR: Stages theories of health behavior: Conceptual and methodological issues.Health Psychology. 1998,17:290–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW:Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goldstein H:Multilevel Statistical Models (2nd Ed.). New York: Halstead Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD, Flay BR: Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1994,62:757–765.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ: Application of random-effects regression models in relapse research.Addiction. 1996,91(Suppl.):S211-S229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD: A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis.Biometrics. 1994,50:933–944.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by National Institutes of Mental Health Grant MH56146 and National Cancer Institute Grant CA 62964.

The authors thank guest editor Dawn Wilson, Ph.D., and three anonymous reviewers for many helpful and constructive comments.

About this article

Cite this article

Hedeker, D., Mermelstein, R.J. & Weeks, K.A. The thresholds of change model: An approach to analyzing stages of change data. ann. behav. med. 21, 61–70 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895035

Keywords

Navigation