Skip to main content
Log in

Response of four potato cultivars to rate and timing of nitrogen fertilizer

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The release of three new potato (Solarium tuberosum L.) cultivars, Bannock Russet, Gem Russet, and Summit Russet, with unique plant growth characteristics, necessitates the development of appropriate N fertilizer recommendations. These three new cultivars, along with the standard cultivar, Russet Burbank, were treated with four N rates (0, 100, 200, and 300 kg N ha−1) using two different application timing procedures (“early,” with two-thirds N applied preplant, and “late,” with one-third applied preplant). Measurements included total and U.S. No. 1 yields, petiole NO3-N concentrations, and net returns derived from economic analysis using a processing-based contract. Each of the four cultivars showed a unique response to N application treatments. Bannock Russet achieved maximum yield and net returns with relatively small amounts of N fertilizer. It also showed no response to N application timing and had moderate NO3-N sufficiency concentrations early in the season, that decreased markedly late in the season. Gem Russet N requirement for maximum yield was similar to that of Russet Burbank, but required a higher amount of N for maximum net returns. Gem Russet also showed no response to application timing and had NO3-N sufficiency concentrations similar to or slightly higher than those of Russet Burbank. Summit Russet showed a strong trend for improved N use-efficiency when most of the N was applied early. On the other hand, analysis of net returns revealed a trend for greater profitability for Summit Russet when the majority of N was applied during tuber bulking. Petiole NO3-N sufficiency concentrations for Summit Russet were generally higher than those for the other three cultivars. In comparison with some earlier studies with Russet Burbank, this research suggested lower optimal N rates and petiole NO3-N sufficiency concentrations.

Resumen

La liberación de tres nuevos cultivares de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.), Bannock Russet, Gem Russet, y Summit Russet que tienen características únicas de crecimiento, requieren del desarrollo de recomendaciones apropiadas de fertilización nitrogenada. Estos tres nuevos cultivares junto con el cultivar estándar Russet Burbank, fueron tratados con tres dosis (0,100,200 y 300 Kg de N/ha−1) utilizando dos procedimientos de aplicación (“temprano,” con las dos terceras partes de nitrógeno aplicadas antes de la siembra y “tardio,” con la tercera parte de N aplicada antes de la siembra). Se tomó en cuenta el rendimiento total y el rendimiento de U.S. No. 1, concentración de NO3-N en los pecíolos y utilidades netas derivadas del análisis económico neto por contrato de procesamiento. Cada uno de los cuatro cultivares mostró una respuesta especial a los tratamientos de aplicación de N. Bannock Russet alcanzó un rendimiento máximo y utilidad neta con cantidades relativamente pequenas de fertilizante nitrogenado. No mostró respuesta a la época de aplicación de N y tuvo una moderada concentración de NO3-N en los inicios, la misma que fue decreciendo marcadamente hacia finales del período de cultivo. Los requerimientos de N de Gem Russet para un rendimiento máximo fueron similares a los de Russet Burbank pero necesitó una mayor cantidad de N para obtener una utilidad neta máxima. Gem Russet tampoco mostró respuesta a la época de aplicación y presentó suficiente concentratión de NO3-N similar o ligeramente superior a la de Russet Burbank. Summit Russet mostró una fuerte tendencia al uso de N cuando se aplicó con la modalidad de “temprano.rd Por otra parte, el análisis de utilidades netas reveló la tendencia de Summit Russet a una mayor utilidad, cuando la mayor cantidad de N se aplicó en la etapa de desarrollo del cultivo. Las concentraciones adecuadas de NO3-N en el pecíolo fueron generalmente mayores para Summit Russet que para los otros tres cultivares. Comparativamente con algunos estudios anteriores de Russet Burbank, esta investigacion sugiere el empleo de dosis mas bajas de N y de concentraciones adecuadas de NO3-N en el peciolo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

N:

nitrogen

NO3-N:

nitrate nitrogen

Literature Cited

  • Cataldo DA, M Haroon, LE Schrader, and VL Youngs. 1975. Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by titration of salicylic acid. Comm Soil Plant Sci 6:71–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner BR, and JP Jones. 1975. Petiole analysis and the nitrogen fertilization of ‘Russet Burbank’ potatoes. Am Potato J 52:195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson PJS, DJ Tonks, and BR Beutler. 2003. Efficacy and economics of weed control programs in glyphosate-resistant potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Tech (in press).

  • Johnson CL, TA Tindall, M Thornton, and RA Brooks. 1995. Petiole NO3-N sufficiency curves in newly developed potato cultivars. Proc Univ Idaho Winter Commodity Schools 27:209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JP, and CG Painter. 1975. Tissue analysis, a guide to nitrogen fertilization of Idaho ‘Russet Burbank’ potatoes. Univ of Idaho Current Info Series No 240.

  • Keeney DR, and DW Nelson. 1982. Nitrogen-Inorganic forms.In: AL Page, RH Miller, and DR Keeney (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd Ed. ASA, SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinkopf GE, and DT Westermann. 1986. Scheduling nitrogen applications for Russet Burbank potatoes. Univ of Idaho Curr Info Series No 637.

  • Kleinkopf GE, DT Westermann, and RB Dwelle. 1981. Dry matter production and nitrogen utilization by six potato cultivars. Agron J 73:799–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer DA 1986a. Response of Nooksack potatoes to nitrogen fertilizer. Am Potato J 63:251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer DA. 1986b. ‘Russet Burbank’ yield response to sprinkler-applied nitrogen fertilizer. Am Potato J 63:61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love SL, R Novy, DL Corsini, JJ Pavek, AR Mosley, RE Thornton, SR James, and DC Hane. 2002. ‘Gem Russet’: a long russet potato cultivar with excellent fresh market and french fry processing quality. Amer J Potato Res 79:25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean AA. 1984. Time of application of fertilizer nitrogen for potatoes in Atlantic Canada. Am Potato J 61:23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMurdo W, RK Prange, and R Veinot. 1988. Nitrogen fertilization and petiole tissue testing in production of whole seed tubers of the potato cultivars Sebago and Atlantic. Can J Plant Sci 68:901–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millard P, and B Marshall. 1986. Growth, nitrogen uptake and partitioning within the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) crop, in relation to nitrogen application. J Agric Sci Camb 107:421429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard P, and D. Robinson. 1990. Effect of the timing and rate of nitrogen fertilization on the growth and recovery of fertilizer nitrogen within the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) crop. Fert Res 21:133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novy RG, DL Corsini, SL Love, JJ Pavek, AR Mosley, SR James, DC Hane, CC Shock, KA Rykbost, CR Brown, and RE Thornton. 2002. ‘Bannock Russet’: a dual-purpose russet potato cultivar with high U.S. No. 1 yield and multiple disease resistances. Amer J Potato Res 79:147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter GA, and JA Sisson. 1991a. Petiole nitrate content of Mainegrown ‘Russet Burbank’ and ‘Shepody’ potatoes in response to varying nitrogen rates. Am Potato J 68:493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter GA, and JA Sisson. 1991b. Response of ‘Russet Burbank’ and ‘Shepody’ potatoes to nitrogen fertilizer in two cropping systems. Am Potato J 68:425443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, and AI Dow. 1982. Critical nutrient ranges for petiole phosphorus levels of sprinkler-irrigated ‘Russet Burbank’ potatoes. Agron J 74:583–585.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, HH Cheng, and FO Farrow. 1991. Potato uptake and recovery of nitrogen-15-enriched ammonium nitrate from periodic applications. Agron J 83:378–381.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, WH Weaver, and JP Phelps. 1982. Effect of rate and time of fertilization in nitrogen and yield of ‘Russet Burbank’ potatoes under center pivot irrigation. Am Potato J 59:77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rykbost KA, NW Christensen, and J Maxwell. 1993. Fertilization of ‘Russet Burbank’ in short-season environment. Am Potato J 70:699–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark JC, DT Westermann, and JF Guenthner. 1995. Economic and environmental concerns related to potato irrigation and nitrogen management. Western Nutrient Mgt. Conf Proc 1:87–92. Potash and Phosphate Inst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitosh ML, and GH Silva. 1996. Factors affecting potato petiole sap nitrate tests. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 27:1137–1152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vos J. 1999. Split application in potato: affects on accumulation of nitrogen and dry matter in the crop and on the nitrogen budget. J Agric Sci Camb 133:263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterer D. 1997. Petiole sap NO3−N testing as a method for monitoring nitrogen nutrition of potato crops. Can J Plant Sci 77:273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott MP, VR Stewart, and RE Lund. 1991. Critical petiole nitrate levels in potato. Agron J 83:844–850.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westermann DT, and GE Kleinkopf. 1985. Nitrogen requirements of potatoes. Agron J 77:616–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermann DT, GE Kleinkopf, and LK Porter. 1988. Nitrogen fertilizer efficiencies on potatoes. Am Potato J 65:377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CMJ, and NA Maier. 1990. Determination of the nitrogen status of irrigated potato crops: I. Critical nutrient ranges for nitratenitrogen in petioles. J Plant Nutr 13:971–984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Love.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Love, S.L., Stark, J.C. & Salaiz, T. Response of four potato cultivars to rate and timing of nitrogen fertilizer. Amer J of Potato Res 82, 21–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894916

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894916

Additional Key Words

Navigation