The effect of a message source on the persuasion of a target audience has been a topic of interest to scholars in psychology, consumer behavior, and communications for many years. Narrative reviews of this literature are available; the contribution of this study is that we present a quantitative review of studies of source effects on persuasion. One of our research goals is to determine how strong and consistent source manipulations tend to be. We find that, on average, source manipulations account for nine percent of explained variance among studies reporting significant findings. In particular, expertise tends to have the greatest effect on persuasion with an average of 16 percent of the explained variance being due to the expert versus non-expert manipulation. As well as gaining insight into the pattern of results across a body of literature, our findings may be used as benchmarks by researchers, as advocated by Sawyer and Ball (1981), to evaluate results of future persuasion studies employing a source manipulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Andreoli, Virginia and Stephen Worchel. 1978. “Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Position on Attitude Change.”Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (Spring): 59–70.
Beaman, Arthur L. 1991. “An Empirical Comparison of Meta-analytic and Traditional Reviews.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (June): 252–257.
Berlo, David K., James Lemert, and Robert J. Mertz. 1970. “Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources.”Public Opinion Quarterly 33 (Winter): 563–576.
Bersheid, Ellen and Elaine Walster. 1974. “Physical Attractiveness.” InAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 7. Ed. Leonard Berkowitz. New York, NY: Academic Press, 157–217.
Bettinghaus, E. P., G. Miller, and T. Steinfatt. 1970. “Source Evaluation, Syllogistic Content, and Judgments of Logical Validity by High- and Low-Dogmatic Persons.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4 (October): 614–621.
Bochner, S. and Chester Insko. 1966. “Communicator Discrepancy, Source Credibility and Opinion Change.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4 (December): 614–621.
Brinberg, David and James Jaccard. 1986. “Meta-Analysis: Techniques for the Quantitative Integration of Research Findings.” InPerspectives on Methodology in Consumer Research. Eds. David Brinberg and Richard J. Lutz. New York, NY: Springer, 155–180.
Brock, Timothy. 1965. “Communicator-Recipient Similarity and Decision Change.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1 (June): 650–654.
Brown, Steven P. and Douglas M. Stayman. 1992. “Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude toward the Ad: A Meta-Analysis.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (June): 34–51.
Busch, Paul and David T. Wilson. 1976. “An Experimental Analysis of a Salesman’s Expert and Referent Bases of Social Power in the Buyer-Seller Dyad.”Journal of Marketing Research 13 (February): 3–11.
Campbell, Donald. 1957. “Factors Relevant to the Validity of Experiments in Social Settings.”Psychological Bulletin 54 (July): 297–312.
Chaiken, Shelly. 1979. “Communicator Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (August): 1387–1397.
—————. 1980. “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (November): 752–766.
Cooper, Harris M. and Kevin M. Lemke. 1991. “On the Role of Meta-Analysis is Personality and Social Psychology.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (June): 245–251.
DeBono, Kenneth G. and Richard Harnish. 1988. “Source Expertise, Source Attractiveness, and the Processing of Persuasive Information: A Functional Approach.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (October): 541–546.
Dholakia, Ruby Roy and Brian Sternthal. 1977. “Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities?”Journal of Consumer Research 3 (March): 223–232.
Fern, Edward F., Kent B. Monroe, and Ramon A. Avila. 1986. “Effectiveness of Multiple Request Strategies: A Synthesis of Research Results.”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (May): 144–152.
French, J. R. P. and Bertram Raven. 1959. “The Bases of Social Power.” InStudies in Social Power. Ed.. D. Cartwright. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 150–167.
Giffin, Kim. 1967. “The Contribution of Studies of Source Credibility to a Theory of Interpersonal Trust in the Communication Process.”Psychological Bulletin 68 (August): 104–119.
Gotlieb, Jerry and Dan Sarel. 1992. “The Influence of Type of Advertisement, Price and Source Credibility on Perceived Quality.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20 (Summer): 253–260.
Harmon, Robert R. and Kenneth A. Coney. 1982. “The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility In Buy and Lease Situations.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (May): 255–260.
Hays, William. 1973.Statistics for the Social Sciences. Second edition. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
—————. 1981.Statistics. Third edition. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Heesacker, Martin. 1986. “Counseling Pretreatment and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Attitude Change.”Journal of Counseling Psychology 33 (April): 107–114.
Hovland, Carl I., Irving L. Janis, and Harold H. Kelley. 1953.Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hunter, John E. and Frank L. Schmidt. 1990.Methods of Meta-Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Iman, Ronald L. and W. J. Conover. 1983. “Multiple Comparison Procedures Based on the Rank Transformation.” Working Paper. Texas Tech University.
Johnson, Blair T. 1991. “Insights about Attitudes: Meta-analytic Perspectives.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (June): 289–299.
Johnson, Blair T. and Alice H. Eagly. 1989. “Effects of Involvement on Persuasion: A Meta-Analysis.”Psychological Bulletin 106 (September): 290–314.
Johnson, Homer and Richard Izzett. 1969. “Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Attitude Change as a Function of Source Credibility and Type of Communication.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13 (December): 317–321.
Johnson, Homer and John Scileppi. 1969. “Effects of Ego-Involvement Conditions on Attitude Change to High and Low Credibility Communicators.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13 (September): 31–36.
Kahle, Lynn R. and Pamela M. Homer. 1985. “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (March): 954–961.
Kelman, Herbert C. 1961. “Processes of Opinion Change.”Public Opinion Quarterly 25 (Spring): 57–78.
McCroskey, James. 1969. “A Summary of Experimental Research on the Effects of Evidence in Persuasive Communication.”Quarterly Journal of Speech 55 (April): 169–176.
McGinnies, Elliott. 1973. “Initial Attitude, Source Credibility and Involvement as Factors in Persuasion.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9 (July): 285–296.
McGinnies, Elliott and Charles Ward. 1974. “Persuasibility as a Function of Source Credibility and Locus of Control: Five Cross-Cultural Experiments.”Journal of Personality 42 (September): 360–371.
McGuire, William. 1985. “Attitudes and Attitude Change.” InHandbook of Social Psychology. Third edition. Eds. Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson. New York, NY: Random House, 223–346.
McNeill, Brian W. and Cal D. Stoltenberg. 1988. “A Test of the Elaboration Likelihood Model for Therapy.”Cognitive Therapy and Research 12 (February): 69–80.
Moore, Danny L., Douglas Hausknecht, and Kanchana Thamodaran. 1988. “Time Compression, Response Opportunity, and Persuasion.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (June): 85–99.
Ostrom, Thomas W. and Timothy C. Brock. 1968. “A Cognitive Model of Attitudinal Involvement.” InTheories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook. Eds. Robert Abelson, Elliott Aronson, William J. McGuire, Theodore M. Newcomb, Milton J. Rosenberg, and Percy H. Tannenbaum. Skokie, IL: Rand-McNally, 373–383.
Peterson, Robert A., Gerald Albaum, and Richard F. Beltramini. 1985. “A Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Consumer Behavior Experiments.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June): 97–103.
Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo. 1986.Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo, and R. Goldman. 1981. “Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (November): 847–855.
Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo, and David Schumann. 1983. “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (September): 135–146.
Rao, Akshay and Kent B. Monroe. 1989. “The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (August): 351–357.
Rhine, Ramon and Laurence J. Severance. 1970. “Ego-Involvement, Discrepancy, Source Credibility, and Attitude Change.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16 (October): 175–190.
Ritchie, Elaine and E. Jerry Phares. 1969. “Attitude Change as a Function of Internal-External Control and Communicator Status.”Journal of Personality 37 (September): 429–443.
Rosenthal, Robert. 1991.Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Sawyer, Alan G. and Dwayne Ball. 1981. “Statistical Power and Effect Size in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (August): 275–290.
Sherif, Carolyn W., M. Sherif, and R. W. Nebergall. 1965.Attitude and Attitude Change. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
Siegal, Sidney. 1954.Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Simons, Herbert W., Nancy N. Berkowitz, and R. John Moyer. 1970. “Similarity, Credibility, and Attitude Change: A Review and A Theory.”Psychological Bulletin 73 (January): 1–16.
Sternthal, Brian, Lynn W. Phillips, and Ruby Dholakia. 1978. “The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: A Situational Analysis.”Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (Fall): 285–314.
Stiff, James B. 1986. “Cognitive Processing of Persuasive Message Cues: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Supporting Information on Attitudes.”Communication Monographs 53 (March): 75–89.
Tellis, Gerard J. and Birger Wernerfelt. 1987. “Competitive Price and Quality Under Asymetric Information.”Marketing Science 6 (Summer): 240–253.
Walster, Elaine, Elliot Aronson, and D. Abrahams. 1966. “On Increasing the Persuasiveness of a Low Prestige Communicator.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2 (October): 325–342.
Wood, Wendy and Carl A. Kallgren. 1988. “Communicator Attributes and Persuasion: Recipients’ Access to Attitude-Relevant Information in Memory.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 14 (March): 172–182.
Woodside, Arch G. and William Davenport. 1974. “The Effect of Salesman Similarity and Expertise on Consumer Purchasing Behavior.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (May): 198–202.
Woodside, Arch G. and William Davenport. 1976. “Effects of Price and Salesman Expertise on Customer Purchasing Behavior.”Journal of Business 49 (January): 51–60.
Wu, Chenghuan and David Shaffer. 1987. “Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experience with the Attitude Object.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (April): 677–688.
Yalch, Richard F. and Rebecca Elmore-Yalch. 1984. “The Effect of Numbers on the Route to Persuasion.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (June): 522–527.
Zaichkowsky, Judith L. 1985. “Measuring the Involvement Construct.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (December): 341–352.
She received a Ph.D. in Business Administration from the Pennsylvania State University in 1989. Dr. Wilson’s research interests include persuasion processes, meta-analysis, and issues in business marketing. Her work has been published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Marketing Research, Marketing Letters, and elsewhere.
He received a Ph.D. in Business Administration from the University of South Carolina in 1980. Dr. Sherrell’s research interests include consumer behavior, retailing, and marketing management. His work has been published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Consumer Research, Psychology and Marketing, and elsewhere.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, E.J., Sherrell, D.L. Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. JAMS 21, 101 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894421
- Consumer Research
- Average Ranking
- Physical Attractiveness
- Source Effect
- Source Credibility