Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical correlates of role conflict and ambiguity in marketing: The mediating role of cognitive moral development

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers in marketing ethics have identified the importance of cognitive moral development (CMD) in marketing ethics models. This study looks at selected correlates of role conflict and role ambiguity in marketing, especially the mediating role of CMD. Of the correlates examined, the results seem to support the existence of statistically significant relationships between CMD and role conflict and ambiguity. Implications for practitioners are provided. For example, the study could have direct implications for management personnel who have the responsibility of hiring ethical people and helping them address any role conflict or ambiguity that may arise from their job.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bebeau, Muriel J., James R. Rest, and Catherine M. Yamoor. 1985. “Measuring Dental Students’ Ethical Sensitivity.”Journal of Dental Education 49 (4): 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, Bruce J. and Edwin J. Thomas, eds. 1966.Role Theory: Concepts and Research. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, Augusto. 1980. “Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature.”Psychological Bulletin 88 (1): 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, Michael, Clarence Gratto, Jerry Gravander, and Mark Tuttle. 1987. “A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making.”Journal of Business Ethics 6 (May): 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Richard and Florence L. Geis. 1970.Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr., Neil M. Ford, and Orville C. Walker, Jr. 1993.Sales Force Management. Boston: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, Anne, Lawrence Kohlberg, John Gibbs, and Marcus Lieberman. 1983. “A Longitudinal Study of Moral Judgment.”Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 48 (1–2): Serial No. 200.

  • Dubinsky, Alan J. and Barbara Loken. 1989. “Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing.”Journal of Business Research 19: 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and Larry G. Gresham. 1985. “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer): 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, —————, and John Fraedrich. 1989. “A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing.”Journal of Macromarketing 9 (Fall): 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, Donelson R. 1980. “A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1): 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and William R. Pope. 1984. “Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (6): 1365–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, John C. and Keith F. Widaman. 1982.Social Intelligence: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982.In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby, Jerry R., and Shelby D. Hunt. 1992. “Cognitive Moral Development and Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 56 (January): 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Neal, Ward S. Mason, and Alexander W. McEachern. 1958.Explorations in Role Analysis. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. Harvey and Henry P. Sims. 1978. “Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment.”Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (4): 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1979. “Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment.”Journal of Applied Psychology 64 (3): 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. and Lawrence B. Chonko. 1984. “Marketing and Machiavellianism.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Summer): 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and Scott J. Vitell. 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of Macromaketing 6 (Spring): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1993. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision.” InEthics in Marketing. Eds. John A. Quelch and Graig Smith. Chicago: Irwin, 775–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Thomas M. 1991. “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model.”Academy of Management Review 16 (2): 366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R., D. Wolfe, R. Quinn, J. Snoek, and R. Rosenthal. 1964.Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, David and Robert L. Kahn. 1978.The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1968. “Early Education: A Cognitive-Developmental View.”Child Development 39 (4): 1013–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1969. “Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialization.” InHandbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Ed. D. A. Goslin. Chicago: Rand McNally, 347–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1976. “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach.” InMoral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues. Ed. Thomas Lickona. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, Ronald E. and Andrea L. Dixon. 1994. “Sellers and Buyers on the Boundary: Potential Moderators of Role Stress-Job Outcome Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (Winter): 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, William Y. and Boyd D. Collier. 1985. “Current Research in Moral Development as a Decision Support System.”Journal of Business Ethics 4 (April): 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, Jean. 1932.The Moral Judgment of the Child. Trans. Marjorie Gabain. Edinburgh, UK: The Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, James R. 1979.Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1983. “Morality.” InCognitive Development: Manual of Child Psychology, vol. 3. Eds. J. Flavell and E. Markman. New York: John Wiley, 556–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1984. “The Major Components of Morality.” InMorality, Moral Behavior and Moral Development. Eds. W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gerwitz. New York: John Wiley, 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1986a.DIT Manual. 3d ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1986b.Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, John R., Robert J. House, and Sidney I. Lirtzman. 1970. “Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly 15: 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sager, Jeffrey K. 1994. “A Structural Model Depicting Salespeople’s Job Stress.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (Winter): 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, Barry R. and Donelson R. Forsyth. 1977. “On the Ethics of Psychological Research.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13: 369–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, Anusorn and Scott J. Vitell. 1990. “Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternative.”Journal of Macromarketing 10 (Spring): 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1991. “Research Note: Selected Factors Influencing Marketers’ Deontological Norms.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19 (Winter): 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, Kelly C. and Dale G. Meyer. 1992. “An Integrative Descriptive Model of Ethical Decision Making.”Journal of Business Ethics 11 (February): 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, Stephen J. 1985. “On Improving the Relationship Between Moral Reasoning and External Criteria: The Utilizer/Nonutilizer Dimension.” Dissertation. University of Minnesota.

  • ————— and Mark L. Davison. 1983. “Moral Reasoning Development and Graduate Education.”Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 4 (April): 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, Linda Klebe. 1986. “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model.”Academy of Management Review 11 (3): 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and Stuart A. Youngblood. 1990. “Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior.”Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (4): 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, James. 1990. “Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas.”Human Relations 43 (7): 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wotruba, Thomas R. 1990. “A Comprehensive Framework for the Analysis of Ethical Behavior, With a Focus on Sales Organizations.”Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 10 (Spring): 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He received his Ph.D. in marketing from the University of Mississippi. His work has previously appeared in theJournal of Business Ethics, theJournal of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, theJournal of Marketing Theory and Practice, theJournal of Promotion Management, Health Marketing Quarterly, and various national proceedings.

He received his Ph.D. in marketing from Texas Tech University. His work has previously appeared in theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Macromarketing, theJournal of Business Ethics, International Marketing Review, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, and various other journals and proceedings.

He received his Ph.D. from the University of Oregon. His research has previously appeared in theJournal of Marketing Research and numerous other journals and proceedings.

He received his Ph.D. in marketing from Florida State University. His research has been published in theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Marketing Management, and in various proceedings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, F.N., Vitell, S.J., Barnes, J.H. et al. Ethical correlates of role conflict and ambiguity in marketing: The mediating role of cognitive moral development. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 25, 117–126 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894347

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894347

Keywords

Navigation