Skip to main content
Log in

E-Governance and public marketing tools for universities: A benchmarking proposal

  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a brief review of the literature related to e-governance models and public marketing is made in order to justify the importance of bringing about e-business practices into the context of universities.

In terms of the study’s internal objective, e-governance and public marketing tools are proposed in order both to disseminate the mission and the institutional culture of each university into a formal scheme of benchmarking tools and to obtain accountable and more efficient processes for performing a more efficient administration and other internal activities. On the other hand, in what concerns to its external objective, examples of good institutional governance practices are presented. This kind of governance practices is presented as a strategic tool to create a front-office side that facilitates both interaction and promotion with the public. Furthermore, it will determine the creation of collaborative networks promoted from the University.

Finally, from the results obtained in the ambit of the international research projectOBSEREGIO that was developed by two Portuguese Universities (Beira Interior and Evora) and two Spanish Universities (Extremadura and Salamanca), a benchmarking proposal is suggested in order to reach both internal and external aimed goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves, H. (2003):Uma Abordagem de Marketing à Satisfacão do Aluno do Ensino Superior Público: Indice, Antecedentese Consequências. PhD Thesis, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã (Portugal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, M. (2001):E-Governance in Developing Countries. IICD Research Brief I (March). Available at [http://www.Ftpiicd.org/files/research/briefs/briefl.pdf] (accessed at May/2006).

  • Charles, D. and Benneworth, P. (2002):Evaluating the Regional Contribution of an HEI: A Benchmarking Approach. Bristol: HEFCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. and Hood, C. (1995): De la Administratión Pública Tradicional a la Nueva Gestión Pública. Ensayo sobre la Experiencia Modernizadora de Diversos Países Desarrollados.Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, 3, pp. 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. (1990):Public Services: Working for the Consumer. A Review of Initiatives in Europe to Improve the Responsiveness of Public Services to Consumers. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavián, C. and Lozano, F.J. (2004): La Orientatión al Mercado de la Universidad Pública: Un Reto para el Sistema Universitario Español.International Review on Public and Non Profit Marketing, 1 (2), pp. 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garlick, S. and Pryor, G. (2004):Benchmarking the University: learning about Improvement. Report for the Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, C. ed. (2003):E-Government in Europe: The State of Affairs. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, L. and Raposo, M. (2004): A Natureza do Marketing das Instituções de Ensino Superior Português: Análise Exploratória. In Raposo, M. (coord.)III Jornadas Internacionais de Marketing Público e Não Lucrativo. Covilhã (Portugal): Universidade da Beira Interior, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P. (2004):A Review of the Political Economy of Governance: Erom Property Rights to Voice. Policy Research World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3315. Available at [http://www-wds.worldbank.org/ servlet/WDSContentServerAVDSP/IB/2004/07/06/000090341_20040706142639/Rendered/DF/wps3315.pdf] (accessed at May/2006).

  • Klazar, S.; Nemec, J.; Pribil, J. and Sumpikova, M. (2005): E-Governance and its Application in the Area of Programming Public Expenditures: The Case for the Czech Republic and Slovakia.Occasional Papers in Public Administration and Public Policy, 6 (2), pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckinnon, K.; Walker, S. and Davis, D. (2000):Benchmarking: A Manual for Australian Universities. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortigeira, M. (1999): Marketing Público: La Imagen de Portugal en España.Revista do Instituto Superior Politécnico Poriucalense, special issue (vol. 2), pp. 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, J.M. (2005): Un Nuevo Marketing de las Universidades: Objetivos Formativos y Demandas Sociales. In Mier-Terán, J. J. and Serrano, C. (coords.)IV Congreso Internacional de Marketing Público y No Lucrativo. Jerez de la Frontera (Spain): Ayuntamiento de Jerez, electronic edition (CD ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santesmases, M. (2004):Marketing. Conceptosy Estrategias. 5th ed. Madrid: Pirámide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvério, F. (2002): CRM em Marketing Público.Revista de Comunicação e Marketing, 3, pp. 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vela, C. and Bocigas, O. (1996):Fundamentos de Marketing. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia de Comillas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mário Raposo, João Leitão or Arminda Maria do Paço.

Additional information

Data for this paper were obtained as part of the International Research ProjectOBSEREGIO, with the financial support of the European Program INTERREG III

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raposo, M., Leitão, J. & Paço, A.M.d. E-Governance and public marketing tools for universities: A benchmarking proposal. Int Rev on Public Marketing 3, 25–40 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893618

Key Word

Navigation