Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of bladder cancer from the urine using fluorescencein situ hybridization technique

  • Article
  • Published:
Pathology & Oncology Research

Abstract

The authors report on their first experiences with the UroVysion fluorescencein situ hybridization (FISH) kit developed for the detection of bladder cancer. This new non-invasive diagnostic application of the FISH technique in the field of urology was elaborated to replace cystoscopy. The special urine examination method detects genetic alterations of the urothelial cells found in the urine, using fluorescent directlabeled DNA probes binding to the peri-centromeric regions of chromosomes 3, 7 and 17 as well as on the 9p21 locus. We aimed to evaluate the utility of UroVysion test in the light of the histological diagnosis. Urine samples from 43 bladder cancer patients and 12 patients with no or benign alterations were studied using a new application of FISH technique: the UroVysion reagent kit. The obtained FISH results were compared with the histological findings of the transurethral surgical resection specimens. The study rated the specificity and sensitivity of the technique 100% and 87%, respectively. Therefore, the technique could well fit into the diagnostic process of bladder carcinomas. Statistical analyses showed significant correlation between tumor progression and the severity of the genetic alterations detected by this FISH technique. Furthermore, positive correlation was found between tumor grade and the proportion of tumor cells showing genetic abnormality. The noninvasiveness, the robustness of evaluation and the high specificity/sensitivity are all in favor of this technique. The disadvantages are the higher costs of the technical background and the required future clinical studies to determine whether this technique can replace cystoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BTA test:

Bard’s bladder tumor antigen test

CCD:

charge-coupled device

CDKN2A:

cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A

CEP:

chromosome enumeration probe

CT:

computed tomography

DAPI:

4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

FDA:

United States Food and Drug Administration

FISH:

fluorescence in situ hybridization

K-W/DMC tests:

Kruskal-Wallis / Dunn’s multiple comparison tests

LSI:

locus-specific identifier

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

MW test:

Mann-Whitney test

NMP22:

nuclear matrix protein 22

PBS:

phosphate-buffered saline

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

SSC:

sodium chloride and sodium citrate solution

TPA:

tissue polypeptide antigen

UroVysion test-positive cells:

cells showing cytogenetic abnormalities listed in positivity criteria of UroVysion Bladder Cancer Recurrence Kit

References

  1. Droller M.J.: Bladder cancer: state-of-the-art care. Ca: Cancer J Clin 48: 269–284, 1998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oosterlinck W, Lobel B, Jakse G, Malmstrom PU, Stockle M, Sternberg C: Guidelines on bladder cancer. Eur Urol 41: 105–112, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ, Frable W Corder MP, Hafermann MD, Hawkins IR: Superficial bladder cancer progression et recurrence. J Urol 130: 1083–1086, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hailing KC, King W, Sokolova IA, Meyer RG, Burkhardt HM, Hailing AC, Cheville JC, Sebo TJ, Ramakumar S, Stewart CS, Pankratz S, O’Kane DJ, Seelig SA, Lieber MM, Jenkins RB: A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of bladder cancer. J Urol 164: 1768–1775, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hailing KC, King W, Sokolova IA, Karnes RJ, Meyer RG, Powell EL, Sebo TJ, Cheville JC, Clayton AC, Krajnik KL, Ebert TA, Nelson RE, Burkhardt HM, Ramakumar S, Stewart CS, Pankratz VS, Lieber MM, Blute ML, Zincke H, Seelig SA, Jenkins RB, O’Kane DJ: A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and Vysis UroVysion assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. J Urol 167: 2001–2006, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bollmann M, Heller H, Bankfalvi A, Griefingholt H, Bollmann R: Quantitative molecular urinary cytology by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a tool for tailoring surveillance of patients with superficial bladder cancer? BJU Int 95: 1219–1225, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J: Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer 80: 827–841, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Glas AS, Roos D, Deutekom M, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Kurth KH: Tumor markers in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer. A systematic review. J Urol 169: 1975–1982, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman HB: New methods for detection of bladder cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 16: 17–22, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Slaton JW, Dinney CP, Veltri RW, Miller CM, Lieben M, O’Dowd GJ, Grossman HB: Deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy enhances the cytological prediction of recurrent transitional ceU carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 158: 806–811, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Poppel H, Billen J, Goethuys H, Elgamal AA, Gerits M, Mortelmans L, Blanckaert N, Baert L: Serum tissue polypeptide antigen (TEA) as a tumor marker for bladder cancer. Anticancer Res 16: 2205–2208, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang FF, Arber DA, Wilson TG, Kawachi MH, Slovak ML: Toward the validation of aneusomy detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization in bladder cancer: comparative analysis with cytology, cytogenetics, and clinical features predicts recurrence and defines clinical testing limitations. Clin Cancer Res 3: 2317–2328, 1997

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mao L, Schoenberg MP, Scicchitano M, Erozan YS, Merlo A, Schwab D, Sidransky D: Molecular detection of primary bladder cancer by microsatellite analysis. Science 271: 659–662, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Steiner G, Schoenberg MP, Linn JF, Mao L, Sidransky D: Detection of bladder cancer recurrence by microsatellite analysis of urine. Nature Med 3: 621–624, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Skacel M, Fahmy M, Brainard JA, Pettay JD, Biscotti CV, Liou LS, Procop GW, Jones JS, Ulchaker J, Zippe CD, Tubbs RR: Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology. J Urol 169: 2101–2105, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabor Lotz.

Additional information

Both authors have equally contributed to this work.

This work was supported by the following grants: NKFP-1A/0023/2002, OMFB 00606/2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riesz, P., Lotz, G., Páska, C. et al. Detection of bladder cancer from the urine using fluorescencein situ hybridization technique. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 13, 187–194 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893498

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893498

Key words

Navigation