Skip to main content
Log in

Legitimizing public authorities as sponsors: An inquiry into the factors related to the perception and memorization of their sponsorship

  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of sponsorship for public authorities. In the specific context of a European region (the Département Moselle in the East of France) supporting a professional tennis event, it is shown that public authorities are most likely to be recognized as sponsors by young spectators interested in the activity sponsored and residents of the region concerned

As public sponsorship being believed to be beneficial for the region both in terms of image and awareness, increases with liking of the event, and is not perceived as a waste of tax money. Thus, this research provides evidence legitimizing public authorities in their role of “sponsors”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cornwell, T.B. and Maignan, I. (1998): An International Review of Sponsorship Research.Journal of Advertising, vol. 27, no 1, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, T.B.; Maignan, I. and Irwin, R. (1997): Long-Term Recall of Sponsorship Sources. An Empirical Investigation of Stadium and Sport Cafe Audiences.Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deimel, K. (1993): Erinnerungswirkung der Sportwerbung. Marketing.Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEG (2004):IEG Sponsorship Report 2004. Available at [http://www.sponsorship.com] (accessed at 31/05/2005).

  • Lardinoit, T. (1999): Interaction des Parrainages Terrain et TV: Impact sur Deux Niveaux de Mémorisation. InProceedings of the 15th Congress of the French Marketing Association (AFM). Strasbourg: Association Française de Marketing, pp. 585–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. (1992): Does Sponsorship Always Talk the Same Language? An Overview of How Attitudes to Sponsorship Vary across Europe. In Expoconsult (ed.)Sponsorship Europe’92 Conference Proceedings (simultaneously: ESOMAR Seminar on Sponsorship). Maarssen (The Netherlands): Expoconsult, pp. 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S.R. (1998): An Investigation of Match-Up Effects in Sport Sponsorship Advertising.Psychology & Marketing, vol. 16, no 2, pp. 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meenaghan, T. (1998): Current Developments and Future Directions in Sponsorship.International Journal of Advertising, vol. 17, no 1, pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meenaghan, T. (2001): Understanding Sponsorship Effects.Psychology & Marketing, vol. 18, no 2, pp. 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiniger, F. (2000):Möglichkeiten, Grenzen und Praxis des Sponsoring der Öffentlichen Verwaltung. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung in ihrer Eigenschaft als Sponsor und Gesponserte. Doctoral Thesis, Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften Speyer.

  • Moore, J.N.; Pickett, G.M. and Grove, S.J. (1999): The Impact of a Video Screen and Rotational-Signage Systems on Satisfaction and Advertising Recognition.Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 13, no 6, pp. 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quester, P.G. (1997): Awareness as a Measure of Sponsorship Effectiveness: The Adelaide Formula One Grand Prix and Evidence of Incidental Ambush Effects.Journal of Marketing Communications, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quester, P.G. and Farrelly, F. (1998): Brand Association and Memory Decay Effects of Sponsorship: The Case of the Australian Formula One Grand Prix.Journal of Product and Brand Management, vol. 7, no 6, pp. 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quester, P.G.; Farrelly, F. and Burton, R. (1998): Sports Sponsorship Management: A Multinational Comparative Study.Journal of Marketing Communications, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, D.M. and Shani, D. (1989): Olympic Sponsorship vs. “Ambush” Marketing: Who Gets The Gold?.Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 29, no 4, pp. 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, B. (2003): An International Review of Sponsorship Research: Extension and Update.International Journal of Advertising, vol. 22, no 1, pp. 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Björn Walliser, Mathieu Kacha or Raluca Mogos-Descotes.

Additional information

A previous version of this paper was presented atIV International Congress on Public and Non Profit Marketing (Jerez de la Frontera-Spain-; May 26th and 27th, 2005).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walliser, B., Kacha, M. & Mogos-Descotes, R. Legitimizing public authorities as sponsors: An inquiry into the factors related to the perception and memorization of their sponsorship. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 2, 51–58 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893250

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893250

Key Words

Navigation