Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The accuracy of brand and attribute judgments: The role of information relevancy, product experience, and attribute-relationship schemata

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multidimensional approach for accuracy of ratings is introduced that examines consumers’ abilities to assess various brands across a set of attributes and attribute performances across a set of brands. A model is presented that addresses the roles of the relevancy of information, attribute-relationship schemata, and consumers’ product category experience on the accuracy of their brand attribute ratings. Study participants were provided either with relevant or irrelevant attribute information for various automobile brands and later asked to rate the attribute performances of brands. The results indicate that the provision of relevant information in the judgment environment increases brand and attribute rating accuracy but does not favorably affect consumers’ brand attribute-relationship schemata. Rather, consumers’ product experience was directly related to their attribute-relationship schemata, which in turn were related to improved accuracy of brand and attribute ratings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, Joseph W. and J. Wes Hutchinson. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1): 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and John G. Lynch, Jr. 1991. “Memory and Decision Making.” InHandbook of Consumer Behavior. Eds. Thomas Robertson and Harold Kassarjian. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Brian E. and Robert L. Cardy. 1986. “Influence of Halo Error on Appraisal Effectiveness: A Conceptual and Empirical Reconsideration.”Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (4): 662–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, Merrie. 1985. “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, Shelly. 1980. “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (March): 752–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costley, Carolyn L. and Merrie Brucks. 1992. “Selective Recall and Information Use in Consumer Preferences.”Journal of Consumer Research 18 (4): 464–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J. 1955. “Processes Affecting Scores on ‘Understanding of Others’ and ‘Assumed Similarity’.”Psychological Bulletin 52:177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, David J. and David J. Faulds. 1986. “Indexing Product Quality: Issues, Theory, and Results.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1): 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Peter C. Riesz. 1988. “Prices and Price/Quality Relationships: A Longitudinal Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 52 (January): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Kevin, and Dave Roach. 1991. “Are Consumers Evaluating Your Products the Way You Hope and Think They Are?”Journal of Consumer Marketing 8 (2): 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T., and Steven L. Neuberg. 1990. “A Continuum of Impression Formation, From Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation.” InAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 23. Ed. M. P. Zanna. New York: Academic Press, 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furse, David H., Girish N. Punj, and David W. Stewart. 1984. “A Typology of Individual Search Strategies Among Purchasers of New Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (4): 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, Eitan. 1985. “Do Higher Prices Signal Higher Quality?”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (May): 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Joe F., Jr., Ralph Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, and William C. Black. 1998.Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Robert J. and Susan R. Lozada-Larsen. 1988. “Influence of Amount of Information on Job Analysis Rating Accuracy.”Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (3): 457–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, Deborah R., Carol A. Scott, and James R. Bettman. 1986. “Sampling Data for Covariation Assessment: The Effects of Prior Beliefs on Search Patterns.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1): 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardes, Frank R. 1994. “Handbook of Social Cognition.” Eds. Robert Wyer and Thomas Srull. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, Steve W. and Michael P. Kirsch. 1987. “The Systematic Distortion Hypothesis, Halo, and Accuracy: An Individual-Level Analysis.”Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (2): 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and M. B. Mongillo. 1992. “The Nature of Conceptual Similarity Schemata: Examination of Some Basic Assumption.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (1): 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Donald R. and Scot Burton. 1989. “The Relationship Between Perceived and Objective Price-Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (November): 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Richard. 1975. “Changing Brand Attitudes Through Modification of Cognitive Structure.”Journal of Consumer Research 1 (4): 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, Susan P. and Frank R. Kardes. 1999. “The Role of Direction of Comparison, Attribute-Based Processing, and Attitude-Based Processing in Consumer Preference.”Journal of Consumer Research 25 (4): 335–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. and E. Smith. 1982. “Basic-Level Superiority in Picture Categorization.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21 (February): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Kevin R., Kathryn L. Kellam, William K. Balzer, and Jacqueline G. Armstrong. 1984. “Effects of the Purpose of Rating on Accuracy in Observing Teacher Behavior and Evaluating Teaching Performance.”Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (1): 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Whan C. and V. Parker Lessig. 1981. “Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics.”Journal of Consumer Research 8 (2): 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, Corelia and S. Ratneshwar. 1992. “Consumer Covariation Judgments: Theory or Data Driven?”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (3): 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punj, Girish N. 1987. “Research Decision Making in Consumer Durable Purchases.”Journal of Consumer Marketing 4 (3): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Akshay R. and Kent B. Monroe. 1988. “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Wanda A. Sieben. 1992. “The Effect of Prior Knowledge on Price Acceptability and the Type of Information Examined.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (2): 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Carolyn J., Barbara A. Bickart, and John G. Lynch. 1993. “Capturing and Creating Public Opinion in Survey Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 20 (2): 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srull, Thomas K. 1983. “The Role of Prior Knowledge in the Acquisition, Retention, and Use of New Information.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Eds. Richard P. Bagozzi and Alice M. Tybout. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 572–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, Mita and Christine Dekleva. 1987. “Product Categorization and Inference Making: Some Implications for Comparative Advertising.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (3): 372–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulsky, Lorne M. and William K. Balzer. 1988. “Meaning and Measurement of Performance Rating Accuracy: Some Methodological and Theoretical Concerns.”Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (3): 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, Robert S. and D. E. Carlston. 1979.Social Cognition, Inference, and Attribution. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Thomas K. Srull. 1989.Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, Judita L. 1985. “Measuring the Involvement Construct.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (3): 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arkansas Tech University, Arkansas, USA

    Kevin Mason & Dave Roach

  2. University of Arkansas, Arkansas, USA

    Thomas Jensen & Scot Burton

Authors
  1. Kevin Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scot Burton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dave Roach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Kevin Mason is an associate professor of marketing at Arkansas Tech University. His research interests include consumer information processing and choice strategies. He has published in theJournal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Central Business Review, Journal for the Association of Marketing Educators, andInternational Advances in Economics Research.

Thomas Jensen is professor and Wal-Mart lecturer in retailing in the Department of Marketing and Transportation at the University of Arkansas. His research interests include consumer information processing, advertising and price perceptions, and retail image and patronage. His work has been published in theJournal of Consumer Research, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Psychology and Marketing, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Retailing, Journal of Business Research, and other journals.

Scot Burton is professor and Wal-Mart chairholder in marketing, Department of Marketing and Transportation, University of Arkansas. His research interests include public policy and consumer welfare concerns, survey research measurement issues, and consumer price and promotion perceptions. His work has been published in theJournal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Public Opinion Quarterly, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Journal of Retailing, and other journals.

Dave Roach is a professor of management at Arkansas Tech University. His research interests include information processing, judgmental accuracy, and organization change. He has published inHuman Relations, Journal of Applied Psychology, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Journal of Information Technology Management, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Central Business Review, andJournal for the Association of Marketing Educators.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, K., Jensen, T., Burton, S. et al. The accuracy of brand and attribute judgments: The role of information relevancy, product experience, and attribute-relationship schemata. JAMS 29, 307–317 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890787

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890787

Keywords

Search

Navigation