Skip to main content
Log in

New names inPhanerogamae 6

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

94 new nomenclatural combinations are proposed, resulting mostly from the study of taxonomic problems on the generic level. The reasons for the acceptance of the generic rank are given in the case ofAcetosa, Pulegium and of some sections ofOrobanche s. l. andSilene s. l. The taxonomic rank ofGentiana blepharophora Bordził. from the Caucasus has been revised and the taxon is classified as a subspecies ofGentianopsis ciliata. Nomenclatural problems of not numbered “species” inHoffmann's “Flora Deutschlands” from 1800 are demonstrated on the example ofArmeria elongata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adema, F. (1970): Enige opmerkingen over het geslachtPulegium.—Gorteria, Leiden, 5: 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, G. (1890): Monographie der GattungOrobanche.—Bibl. Bot., Cassel, 19: 1–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, G. (1930):Orobanchaceae.— In:Engler, A. (ed.): Das Pflanzenreich, Leipzig, 4/261, 96: 1–348.

  • Chater, A. O. etWalters, S. M. (1964): 28.Silene L.—In:Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H. et al. (ed.): Flora Europaea 1: 158–181.—Cambridge.

  • Chowdhuri, P. K. (1957): Studies in the genusSilene.—Notes Royal Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 22: 221–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilomen, H. (1938a): Neue Beiträge zur Oekologie, Morphologie und Systematik vonCarex curvula All. (Krummsegge).—Mitt. Naturf. Ges. Bern 1937, Sitzungsber. (26)–(27).

  • Gilomen, H. (1938b):Carex curvula All. ssp. nov.Rosae Gilom—Ber. Geobot. Forschungsinst. Rübel Zürich (1937): 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossgejm, A. A. (1952): Rod 1154. Gorečavka—Gentiana L.—In:Šiškin, B. K. etBobrov, E. G. (red.): Flora SSSR 18: 538–620.—Moskva et Leningrad.

  • Guşuleac, M. (1953): Genul 91.Behen Mnch.—In:Savulescu, T. (red.): Flora Republicii Populare Române 2: 131–140.—Bucareşti.

  • Heckard, L. R. etChung, T. I. (1975): Chromosome numbers and polyploidy inOrobanche (Orobanchaceae). —Brittonia, New York, 27: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, H. E., Landolt, E. etHirzel, R. (1967, 1972): Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Vol. 1, 3.—Basel et Stuttgart. (Vol. 1, 1967; Vol. 3, 1972).

  • Holub, J. (1960): Kleine Beiträge zur Flora der ČSSR.—Novit. Bot., Praha, (1960): 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. (1974): New names inPhanerogamae 3.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 9: 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. (1976): New names inPhanerogamae 4.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 11: 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J. (1977): New names inPhanerogamae 5.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 12: 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, J., Měsíček, J. etJavůrková, V. (1971): Annotated chromosome counts of Czechoslovak plants (16–30).—Folia Geobot. Phytotax., Praha, 6: 179–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikonnikov, S. S. (1975): Zamětki o, gvozdičnych (Caryophyllaceae), 3.—Novosti Sist. Vysšich Rast., Leningrad, 12/(1975): 196–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikonnikov, S. S. (1976): Zamětki o gvozdičnych (Caryophyllaceae), 3 [sic!—rectius 4].— Novosti Sist. Vysšich Rast, Leningrad, 13/(1976): 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, Á. etKapoor, B. M. (1967a): New combinations inAcetosa andBucephalophora.—Taxon Utrecht, 16: 519–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löve, Á. etKapoor, B. M. (1967b): A chromosome atlas of the collective genusRumex— Cytologia, Tokyo, 32: 328–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, Á etKjellqvist, E. (1972): Cytotaxonomical vindication of the genusConosilene.— Journ. Ind. Bot. Soc. 50A: 366–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, Á. etLöve, D. (1961): Chromosome numbers of Central and northwest European plant species.—Opera Bot., Lund, 5: 1–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, Á. etLöve, D. (1974): Cytotaxonomical atlas of the Slovenian flora.—Lehre.

  • Löve, Á. etLöve, D. (1975): Cytotaxonomical atlas of the Arctic flora.—Vaduz.

  • Minjajev, N. A. etKutjavina, N. G. (1974): K sistematike vidov rodaArmeria (DC.)Willd., vstrečajuščichsja v SSSR.—Novosti Sist. Vysšich Rast., Leningrad, 11/(1974): 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šilić, Č. (1975): Conspectus generumSatureja L.,Calamintha Moench,Micromeria Bentham,Acinos Moench etClinopodium L. florae Jugoslaviae.—Glasnik Zemal. Muz. Bosne Hercegovine, Sect. Natur., Ser. Nova, Sarajevo, 13/(1974): 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soják, J. (1972): Nomenklatorické poznámky (Phanerogamae).—Čas. Národ. Muz., Sect. Natur., Praha, 140: 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šourková, M. (1972):Pleconax Rafin.—eine bis heute unbeachtete Silenoiden-Gattung (Caryophyllaceae) —Österr. Bot. Zeitschr., Wien, 119: 577–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šourková, M. (1976):Steris Adanson—the correct name for the genusViscaria Bernh. (Caryophyllaceae—Lychnideae).—Novit. Bot. Inst. Bot. Univ. Carol. Pragensis, Praha, (1973–1975): 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, F. A. et al. (ed.) (1972): International Code of botanical nomenclature.—Regnum Vegetab., Utrecht, 82: 1–426.

  • Tolmačev, A. I. etKozančikov, V. I. (1971): Rod 16.Gastrolychnis (Fenzl) Reichenb. [Wahlbergella Fr.]—Drema.—In:Tolmačev, A. I. (red.): Arktičeskaja Flora SSSR 6: 108–116.—Leningrad.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holub, J. New names inPhanerogamae 6. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 12, 417–432 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890652

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890652

Keywords

Navigation