Summary
A method is described for determining the spatial resolution capabilities of a scintillation camera. A special phantom was used, and a comparison between the MTF curves and the results derived from using this phantom shows that the latter is a good and a quick way to check scintillation camera performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McIntyre W. J., Fedoiruk S. O., Harris C. C., Kuhl D. E., Mallard J. R.: Sensitivity and resolution in radioisotope scanning — In: Medical radioisotope scintigraphy. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1969; vol. 1, p. 391.
Murray K. J., Elliot A. T., Wadeworth J.: A new phantom for the assessment of nuclear medicine equipment — Phys. in Med. Biol.24, 188, 1979.
Rollo F. D.: Quality control for scintillation cameras — US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, HEW Publication (FDA) 76–8046.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guidarelli, G., Menozzi, E., Pozzato, R. et al. Comparison between modulation transfer function curves and a new type of phantom for the assessment of the Anger camera performance in99mTc and201Tl studies. La Ricerca Clin. Lab. 11, 271–277 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890533
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890533