Skip to main content
Log in

Improving predictive distributions

  • Improving Judgements Using Feedback
  • Invited Papers
  • Published:
Trabajos de Estadistica Y de Investigacion Operativa

Summary

Consider a sequence of decision problemsS 1,S 2, ... and suppose that in problemS i the statistician must specify his predictive distributionF i for some random variableX i and then make a decision based on that distribution. For example,X i might be the return on some particular investment and the statistician must decide whether or not to make that investment. The random variablesX 1,X 2 ... are assumed to be independent and completely unrelated. It is also assumed that each predictive distributionF i assigned by the statistician is a subjective distribution based on his information and beliefs aboutX i. In this context, the standard Bayesian approach provides no basis for evaluating whether the statistician’s subjective predictive distribution forX i is good or bad, and does not even recognize this question as being meaningful. In this paper we describe models in which the statistician can study his process for specifying predictive distributions identify bad habits, and improve his predictions and decisions by gradually breaking these habits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Degroot, M.H. (1970).Optimal Statistical Decisions, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R.M. (1975). Cognitive processes and the assessment of subjective probability distributions,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 70, 271–289.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lad, F. (1978). Embedding Bayes’ theorem in general learning rules: Connections between idealized behavior and empirical research on learning.Br. J. Math. Statist. Psychology. 31, 113–125.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H.V. (1965). Probabilistic prediction.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 65, 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J. (1971). Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66, 783–801.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spetzler, C.S. andStaël von Holstein, C.S. (1975). Probability encoding in decision analysis,Management Sci. 22, 340–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., andKahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases.Science 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R.L. (1967). The quantification of judgement: Some methodological suggestions.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 62, 1105–1120.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeGroot, M.H. Improving predictive distributions. Trabajos de Estadistica Y de Investigacion Operativa 31, 385–395 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888361

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888361

Keywords

Navigation