Skip to main content
Log in

Pivotal inference and the Bayesian controversy

  • Bayesian and non-Bayesian Conditional Inference
  • Invited Papers
  • Published:
Trabajos de Estadistica Y de Investigacion Operativa

Summary

The theory of pivotal inference applies when parameters are defined by reference to their effect on observations rather than their effect on distributions. It is shown that pivotal inference embraces both Bayesian and frequentist reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References in the Discussion

  • BOOLE, G. (1854).An Investigation in the Laws ofThought. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • CROOK, J.F. and GOOD, I.J. (1980). On the application of symmetric Dirichlet distributions and their mixtures to contingency tables, Part. II.Ann Statist. (in press).

  • DICKEY, J.B. (1976). Approximate posterior distributions.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71, 680–689.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • DICKEY, J.M. (1977). Is the tail area useful as an approximate Bayes factor?.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 72, 138–142.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • EFRON, B. and MORRIS, C. (1973). Combining possibly related estimation problems (with discussion).J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 35, 379–421.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • ERICSON, W. A. (1969). Subjective Bayesian models in sampling finite populations (with discussion).J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 31, 195–233.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • GOOD, I.J. (1950).Probability and the Weighing of Evidence. London: Griffin, New York: Hafner.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — (1967). A Bayesian significance test for multinomial distributions.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 29, 399–431. (with discussion). Corrigendum36 (1974), 109.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1976a). The Bayesian influence, or how to sweep subjectivism under the carpet.Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science. (C.A. Hooker and W. Harper ed.), Vol. 2, 125–174, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1976b) On the application of symmetric Dirichlet distributions and their mixtures to contingency tables.Ann. Statist. 4, 1159–1189.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • GOOD, I.J. and CROOK, J.F. (1974). The Bayes/non-Bayes compromise and the multinomial distribution.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69, 711–720.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • HOERL, A.E. and KENNARD, R.W. (1970). Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems.Technometrics 12, 55–67.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • KADANE, J.B., LEWIS, G.H. and RAMAGE, J.G. (1969). Horvarth’s theory of participation in group discussion.Sociometry 32, 348–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KADANE, J.B. and DICKEY, J.M. (1980). Bayesian decision theory and the simplification of models.Evaluation of Econometric Models. (J. Kmenta and J. Ramseyu, eds) New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINDLEY, D.V. and SMITH, A.F.M. (1972). Bayes estimates for the linear model (with discussion).J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 34, 1–41.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • VON MISES, R. (1942). On the correct use of Bayes’ formula.Ann. Math. Statist. 13, 156–165.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnard, G.A. Pivotal inference and the Bayesian controversy. Trabajos de Estadistica Y de Investigacion Operativa 31, 295–318 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888356

Keywords

Navigation