Skip to main content
Log in

Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

172 cases of pregnant women scheduled for delivery by cesarean section were randomly assigned to 59 cases in modification group with modified Misgav Ladach technique, 57 cases in Misgav Ladach group with Misgav Ladach technique and 56 cases in Pfannenstiel group with Pfannenstiel technique from May to Dec. 1999. The modified points included: transversely incising the fascia 2 to 3 cm, then dividing it bluntly; without opening and dissociating the visceral peritoneum; two layers suturing of low transverse uterine incision; closing the skin by continuous suturing. Results showed the average delivery time in the modification group was (3. 6±2. 6) min and (5. 7±2. 9) min in the Misgav Ladach group (P<0. 05). Median operating time was (28. 3 ±5. 4) min in modification group compared with (27. 5±6. 5) min in the Misgav Ladach group (P>0. 05). Average blood loss was (128±35) ml in modification group compared with (212±147) ml in the Pfannenstiel group (P <0. 05). It was concluded that the modified Misgav Ladach technique not only preserved all advantages of Misgav Ladach method, but also had additional advantages, such as faster in delivering the fetus, less damage, easier mastering for obstetricians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holmgren G, Sjoholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1999, 78(7): 615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 1999. 927

  3. Wallin G, Fall O. Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1999, 106 (3): 221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca Let al. Cesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 1997, 57(3): 273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker E R, Alton M E. Cesarean section birth and cesarean hysterectomy. Clin Obstet, 1994, 37: 806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowenwirt I P, Chi D S, Handwerker S M.et al. Nonfatal venous air embolism during cesarean section: a case report and a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1994, 49: 72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hauth J C, Owen J, Daves R O. Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1992, 73: 1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bjorklund K, Kimaro M, Urassa Eet al. Introduction of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section at an African tertiary centre: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 2000, 107(2): 209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hershey D W, Quilligan E J. Extraabdominal vterine exteriorization at cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol, 1978, 52: 189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Min, L., Li, Z. & Jianwen, Z. Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section. Current Medical Science 21, 75–77 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888044

Key words

Navigation