Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Victim-offender race and support for capital punishment: A factorial design approach

  • Articles
  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing research suggests that juries are more likely to condemn murderers to death when offenders are black victims are white. It remains to be seen, however, whether these decisions reflect broader racial prejudices in society that are imported into the jury room. If they do, then insuring equity in capital sentencing may be beyond reach. Accordingly, this study uses factorial design methodology to examine whether members of the general public are more supportive of capital punishment when asked to rate a vignette describing a murder involving a white victim and black offender as opposed to other victim-offender racial combinations. Our analyses suggest that the race of the offender, but not the victim, has a significant influence on support for capital punishment. Thus, procedural safeguards alone may be unable to eliminate racial bias in capital sentencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre, A., Jr. & D.V. Baker (1990). “Empirical Research on Racial Discrimination in the Imposition of the Death Penalty.”Criminal Justice Abstracts, 22:135–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre, A., Jr. & D.V. Baker (1993). “Racial Prejudice and the Death Penalty: A Research Note.”Social Justice, 20(1–2):150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allredge, E. (1942). “Why the South Leads the Nation in Murder and Manslaughter.”The Quarterly Review, 2:123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, B.K., F.T. Cullen, P.J. Richards, L. Lanza-Kaduce & B.G. Link (1992). “Determinants of Public Punitiveness Toward Drunk Driving: A Factorial Survey Approach.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Pittsburg, PA.

  • Arkin, S. (1980). “Discrimination and Arbitrariness in Capital Punishment: An Analysis of Post-Furman Murder Cases in Dade County, Florida, 1973–1976.”Stanford Law Review, 33:75–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldus, D.C., C. Pulaski & G. Woodworth (1983). “Comparative Review of Death Sentences: An Empirical Study of the Georgia Experience.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74(3):661–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldus, D.C., G. Woodworth & C.A. Pulaski (1990).Equal Justice and the Death Penalty: A Legal and Empirical Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, A. (1985). “Some Distribution Patterns for the Georgia Death Sentence.”U.C. Davis Law Review, 18:1327–1374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, H.A. (1964). “Death Sentences in New Jersey 1907–1964.”Rutgers Law Review, 19:1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1976).The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H.M., Jr. (1979).Social Statistics (revised 2nd. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. & J. Cohen (1980). “Sentencing of Convicted Offenders: An Analysis of the Public’s View.”Law and Society Review, 14(2):223–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, R.M. (1991). “American Death Penalty Opinion. 1936–1986: A Critical Examination of the Gallup Polls.” In R.M. Bohm (ed.),The Death Penalty in America: Current Research (pp. 113–145). Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W.J. (1983). “The Pervasiveness of Arbitrariness and Discrimination UnderPost-Furman Capital Statutes.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74:1067–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W.J. & G.L. Pierce (1980). “Arbitrariness and Discrimination Under Post-Furman Capital Statutes.”Crime and Delinquency, 26(4):563–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cose, E. (1993).The Rage of a Privileged Class. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, R.W. (1986). “Police Attitudes Toward Capital Punishment.”Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14(3):193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T.J., P.G. Brennan & D. Cohen (1992). “Conservativism and Capital Punishment in the State Capitol: Lawmakers and the Death Penalty.”The Prison Journal, 72(1–2):37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, L.A. & R.S. Powell (1982). “The Discretion of Prosecutors, Judges, and Jurists in Capital Cases.”Criminal Justice Review, 7:16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J., F.T. Cullen, L.F. Travis III & J.L. Borntrager (1989). “Sanctioning Corporate Crime: How do Business Executives and the Public Compare?”American Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(2):139–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G., Jr. (1992).The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion 1991. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkle, H. (1949). “Research Note on Inter- and Intra-Racial Homicides.”Social Forces, 27:369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H.G., J.K. Cochran. R.J. Bursik, Jr. & M. Kimpel (1993). “Religion, Punitive Justice, and Support for the Death Penalty.”Justice Quarterly, 10(2):289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, S.R. & R. Mauro (1984). “Patterns of Death: An Analysis of Racial Disparities in Capital Sentencing and Homicide Victimization.”Stanford Law Review, 37:27–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, S.R. & R. Mauro (1989).Death & Discrimination: Racial Disparities in Capital Sentencing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A. (1992).Two Nations: Black and White, Separate, Hostile, and Unequal. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A. & J. E. Jackson (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.B. (1941). “The Negro and Crime.”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 217:93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, T.J. & G.F. Vito (1989). “Race, Homicide Severity, and Application of the Death Penalty: A Consideration of the Barnett Scale.”Criminology, 27(3):511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, T.J. & G.F. Vito (1991). “Kentucky Prosecutors’ Decision to Seek the Death Penalty: A LISREL Model.” In R.M. Bohm (ed.),The Death Penalty in America: Current Research (pp. 53–69). Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. & J. Braithwaite (1990). “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty in Australia.”Justice Quarterly, 7(3):529–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, G. (1981). “Racial Discrimination in Criminal Sentencing: A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence with Additional Evidence on the Death Penalty.”American Sociological Review, 46:783–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K., A.L. Pastore & T.J. Flanagan, (eds.) (1993).Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1992. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangum, C.S. (1940).The Legal Status of the Negro. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, N. (1994).Makes Me Wanna Holler: A Young Black Man in America. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.L., P.H. Rossi & J.E. Simpson (1991). “Felony Punishments: A Factorial Survey of Perceived Justice in Criminal Sentencing.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(2):396–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neapolitan, J. (1983). “Support for and Opposition to Capital Punishment: Some Associated Social-Psychological Factors.”Criminal Justice and Behavior, 10(2):195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Legislative Service Commission (1961).Capital Punishment, Staff Research Report No. 46. Columbus: Author.

  • Osbourne, Y.H. & N.B. Rappaport (1985). “Sentencing Severity with Mock Jurors: Predictive Validity of Three Variable Categories.”Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 3(4):467–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (1983). “Race of Victim and Location of Crime: The Decision to Seek the Death Penalty in South Carolina.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74(3):754–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (1984). “Prosecutorial Discretion in Requesting the Death Penalty: A Case of Victim-Based Racial Discrimination.”Law and Society Review, 18(3):437–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radelet, M.L. & G.L. Pierce (1985). “Race and Prosecutorial Discretion in Homicide Cases.”Law and Society Review, 19(4):587–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, J.H. (1979). “Changing Attitudes Toward Capital Punishment.”Social Forces, 58(1):194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. & A.B. Anderson (1982). “The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction.” In P.H. Rossi & S.L. Nock (eds.),Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovron, S.E., J.E. Scott & F.T. Cullen (1989). “The Death Penalty for Juveniles: An Assessment of Public Support.”Crime and Delinquency, 35(4):526–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.D. (1987). “Patterns of Discrimination in Assessment of the Death Penalty: The Case of Louisiana.”Journal of Criminal Justice, 15:279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.D. & J. Wright (1992). “Capital Punishment and Public Opinion in the Post-Furman Era: Trends and Analyses.”Sociological Spectrum, 12:127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snortum, J.R. & V.H. Ashear (1972). “Prejudice, Punitiveness, and Personality.”Journal of Personality Assessment, 36(3):291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuch, S.A. (1984). “A Multivariate Analysis of Response Structure: Race Attitudes, 1972–1977.”Social Science Research, 13(1):55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. & R. Weber (1982). “Support for the Death Penalty; Instrumental Response to Crime, or Symbolic Attitude?”Law and Society Review, 17(1):21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M.E., A. Kelley & H.C. Nolde (1962). “Comparison of the Executed and the Commuted Among Admissions to Death Row.”Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 53(3):301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R.L. (1992). “Religious Orientation. Race and Support for the Death Penalty.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31(1):76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel, H. & A.M. Gallup (1989). “Death Penalty Sentiment in the United States.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5(3):285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Cases Cited

  • Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).

  • Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 1543 (1976).

  • Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976).

  • McCleskey v. Kemp, 421 U.S. 279 (1987).

  • Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cincinnati, USA

    Brandon K. Applegate, John P. Wright, Francis T. Cullen & John D. Wooldredge

  2. Mississippi State University, USA

    R. Gregory Dunaway

Authors
  1. Brandon K. Applegate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John P. Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Gregory Dunaway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francis T. Cullen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John D. Wooldredge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Applegate, B.K., Wright, J.P., Dunaway, R.G. et al. Victim-offender race and support for capital punishment: A factorial design approach. AJCJ 18, 95–115 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887641

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887641

Keywords

Search

Navigation