Skip to main content

“He said, she said”: Sexual harassment in the fractured criminal justice work place

American Journal of Criminal Justice volume 18, pages 235–257 (1994)Cite this article

Abstract

This article addresses the critical problem of sexual harassment in criminal justice agencies. The authors assess empirically the incidents of sexual harassment in criminal justice organizations, and discuss why sexual harassment is more prevalent in criminal justice agencies than in other public agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

References

  • Abrahamson, M., & Sigelman, L. (1987). Occupational sex segregation in metropolitan areas.American Sociological Review, 52, 588–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Annin, P. (1991). A tale of sex, lies and audiotape.Newsweek, 118, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, K., & Saint-Germain, M. (1988). Public administration and the status of women.American Review of Public Administration, 18, 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D.D., Terpstra, D.E., & Larntz, K. (1990b). Perceptions of sexual harassment: A re-examination of gender differences.The Journal of Psychology, 124(4), 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, E. (1989). Sexual harassment: A continuing source of litigation in the work place.Trial, 25, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A.C., & Stohr, M.K. (1991a). Sexual harassment and support for affirmative action in county-level protective services.American Jails, 5(5), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A.C., & Stohr-Gillmore, M.K. (1991b). Gender & harassment-victim support for affirmative action.State & Local Government Review, 23(1), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, D. (1991). Old issues unresolved: Environment still hostile to women in academe, new evidence indicates.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 38(7), A1, A20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, E. (1990).Everything you need to know about sexual harassment. New York: Rosen Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Van Ochten, M. (1990). Sexual harassment: A vulnerable area for corrections.Corrections Today, 52, 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, L., Springer, K., Rosenberg, D., Carroll, G., Keene-Osborn, S., Bingham, C., & Snow, K. (1991). Why women are angry.Newsweek, 118(17), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. (1991, October 11). Harassment: A perception issues.El Paso Times, pp. 1C, 6C.

  • Clift, E. (1991). Congress: The ultimate men’s club.Newsweek, 118(11), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, F. (1986). Forced to quit: Sexual harassment complaints and agency responses.Sex Roles, 14, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, M.E. (1988). Defusing a liability timebomb: Investigating the sexual harassment complaint.Management Review, 77, 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crites, L.L., & Hepperle, W.L. (Eds.). (1988).Women, the courts, and equality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzeich, B., & Wiener, L. (1984).The lecherous professor. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez, E., & Tontodonato, P. (1992). Sexual harassment in the criminal justice system. In I.L. Moyer (Ed.)The changing roles of women in the criminal justice system. (2nd Ed.) Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, M. (1991). Affirmative action and the staffing demands of the 1990s.Journal of Compensation & Benefits, 6(4), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fain, T.C., & Anderton, D.L. (1987). Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status.Sex Roles, 5/6, 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, L. (1978).Sexual shakedown. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., Johnson, F., & Ryan, M. (1990). Cultural diversity in the workplace.Public Personnel Management, 19(3), 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R.C., & McLaughlin, F. (1989). Sexual harassment at work: What is the problem?Akron Business and Economic Review, 19, 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R.A., & Riordan, CA. (1990). Effect of self-presentation on perceptions and recognition in an organization.The Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D.L., & Leffler, A. (1987). The politics of research methodology in claimsmaking activities: Social science and sexual harassment.Social Problems, 34, 490–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, H. (1991, October 13). Foll: Sexual harassment may not bar confirmation.Las Cruces Sun-News, p.11A.

  • Gomez-Preston, C., & Trescott, J. (1990). Over the edge.Essence, 20, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, N.K., Garrison, C.G., & McCormick, K. (1990). Satisfaction and advancement of police women.Public Personnel Management, 19(2), 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J.E. (1990). Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research.Population Research and Policy Review, 9, 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J.E. (1989). How women handle sexual harassment: A literature review.Sociology & Social Research, 74(1), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., & Bjorn, L. (1986). Women’s responses to sexual harassment: An analysis of sociocultural, organizational, and personal resource models.Social Science Quarterly, 67(4), 814–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., & Bjorn, L. (1982). Blue-collar blues: The sexual harassment of women autoworkers.Work and Occupations, 9, 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. (1985).Sex in the work place. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B.A., Cohen, A.G., & Konrad, A.M. (1990). Predicting social-sexual behavior at work: A contact hypothesis.Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 560–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B., & Dunwoody, V. (1987). Understanding sex in the work place. In Stromberg et al. (Eds.),Women and work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B., Morasch, B., & Cohen, A. (1983). Interpreting social sexual behavior in the work setting.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22(1), 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, D., & Menniti, J.J. (1993). Discrimination and harassment: Litigation by women in policing. In R. Muraskin & T. Alleman (Eds.),It’s a crime: Women and justice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, C. (1991, May 16). Bias suit ends and detective gets promotion.The New York Times, p. B3.

  • Higgenbotham, J. (1988). Sexual harassment in the police station.F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin, 57(9), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. (1980). Perceptions of employment discrimination in the public sector.Public Administration Review, 40, 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J.C. (1990). The logic of sexism among police.Women & Criminal Justice, 1(2), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L.A. (1989). Relative deprivation and the gender wage gap.Journal of Social Issues, 45(4), 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1977a).Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1977b). Some effects of proportion on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women.American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantrowitz, B., Barrett, T., Springer, K., Hager, M., Wright, L., Carroll, G., & Rosenberg, D. (1991). National affairs: Striking a nerve.Newsweek, 118(17), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.A., McDaniel, A., & Annin, P. (1991). National affairs: A moment of truth and anatomy of a debacle.Newsweek, 118(17), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenig, S., & Ryan, J. (1986). Sex differences in levels of tolerance and arbitration of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus.Sex Roles, 15, 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, E. (1991, October 11). Sexual harassment at work is pervasive, survey suggests.The New York Times, p. A1.

  • Lafontaine, E., & Tredeau, L. (1986). The frequency, sources, and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations.Sex Roles, 15(7/8), 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leatherman, C. (1991). Colleges seek new ways to deal with sexual harassment as victims on campuses are reluctant to file complaints.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 38(15), A1, A26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K., & Johnson, P. (1991). Preventing sexual harassment complaints based on hostile work environments.SAM Advanced Management Journal, 56(2), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loscocco, K.A., & Spitze, G. (1991). The organizational context of women’s and men’s pay satisfaction.Social Science Quarterly, 72(1), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunsford, D.S. (1988). Sexual harassment: The latent liability.Police Chief, 55, 100–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C.A. (1982). Sexual harassment: The experience. In B.R. Price & N.J. Sokoloff (Eds.),The criminal justice system and women. New York: Clark Boardman.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C.A. (1979).Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1989). Women on the move?: A report on the status of women in policing.Women & Criminal Justice, 7(1), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.E. (1984). The link between stratification, sexuality, and women’s economic status. In J. Freeman (Ed.),Women: A feminist perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.E. (1980).Breaking and entering: Policewomen on patrol. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1978). Sexual politics in the workplace: The interactional world of economic status. In J. Freeman (Ed.),Women: A feminist perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R., & Rasmussen, J. (1983). A women corrections professor and a woman reserve officer’s view.Police Chief, 50, 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maypole, D.E., & Skaine, R. (1983). Sexual harassment in the work place.Social Work, 28(5), 385–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maypole, D., & Skaine, R. (1982). Sexual harassment of blue collar workers.Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 9(4), 682–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maypole, D. (1986). Sexual harassment of social workers at work: Injustice within?Social Work, 31(1), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D., & Renick, J. (1982). Protecting public employees and employers from sexual harassment.Public Personnel Management, 11(3), 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclntyre, D., & Renick, J. (1983). Sexual harassment and the states as policymakers and employers.State Government, 56(4), 128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staff, (1990). Models for management.Police Chief, 57, 158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. (1987).Women, crime and criminal justice. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, B., & Harlan, S. (1982). Craftworkers and clerks: The effect of male co-worker hostility on women’s satisfaction with non-traditional jobs.Social Problems, 29, 252–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, E.M. (1989). Effects of the male-female ratio at work: Policewomen and male nurses.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, P. (1991). Avoid costly lawsuits for sexual harassment.Editor and Publisher, 124(32), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, C.B. (1982). Doing time with the boys: An analysis of women correctional officers in all-male facilities. In B.R. Price & N.J. Sokoloff (Eds.),The criminal justice system and women. New York: Clark Boardman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock-Byrne, J.M. (1990).Women, prison & crime. Pacific Grove, CA: Brook/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popovich, P.M., Licata, B J., Nokovich, D., Martelli, T., & Zoloty, S. (1987). Assessing the incidence and perceptions of sexual harassment behaviors among American undergraduates.Journal of Psychology, 120, 346–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povich, L. (1992, January). Gloria Steinern interview.Working Woman, pp. 66–81.

  • Price, B.R., & Gavin, S. (1982). A century of women in policing. In B.R. Price & N.J. Sokoloff (Eds.),The criminal justice system and women. New York: Clark Boardman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J.B. (1985). The lay persons understanding of sexual harassment.Sex Roles, 13(5/6), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J.B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men.Sex Roles, 17(5/6), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J., & Day, J. (1988). Interpretations of sexual harassment: An attributional analysis.Sex Roles, 18(7/8), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, M.E., Lott, B., & Gallogly, S. (1986). Sexual harassment of university students.Sex Roles, 15, 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, T.S., Carpenter, S., Dull, S., & Bartlett, P. (1982). The factorial survey: An approach to defining sexual harassment on campus.Journal of Social Issues, 38(4), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reily, P.J. (1980).Sexual harassment in the navy. Unpublished masters thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (1991). Gender dilemmas in sexual harassment policies and procedures.American Psychologist, 46(5), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, L. (1989). Winning is the best revenge.Good Housekeeping, 208, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C.S., & England, R.E. (1987). State government’s sexual harassment policy initiatives.Public Administration Review, 47(3), 259–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saal, F.E., Johnson, C.B., & Weber, N. (1989). Friendly or sexy? It may depend on whom you ask.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 236–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safran, V. (1976). What men do to women on the job: A shocking look at sexual harassment.Redbook, 149, 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salholz, E., Annin, P., & Conn, B. (1991). Thomas and Hill: Mentor or tormentor.Newsweek, 118(17), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. (1991). Why women are angry.Newsweek, 118(17), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnieder, B. (1982). Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shank, S. (1988). Women and the labor market: The link grows stronger.Monthly Labor Review, 111(3), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortland, R.L., & Craig, J.M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior.Social Psychology, 51, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, N.J. (1980).Between Money and Love: The Dialectics of Women’s Home and Market Work. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spann, K. (1990). Dealing effectively with sexual harassment: Some practical lessons from one city’s experience.Public Personnel Management, 19(1), 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, B.S., & Warner, R.L. (1990). Job satisfaction among early labor force participants: Unexpected outcomes in public and private sector comparisons.Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10(3), 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, D.M., Remick, H., Salisbury, J., & Ginorio, A.B. (1990). The power and reasons behind sexual harassment: An employer’s guide to solutions.Public Personnel Management, 19(1), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D.E. (1989). Who gets sexually harassed?Personnel Administrator, 34, 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D.E., & Baker, D.D. (1987). A hierarchy of sexual harassment.Journal of Psychology, 121, 599–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D.E., & Baker, D.D. (1988). Outcomes of sexual harassment charges.Academy of Management Journal, 31, 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmins, W.M., & Hainsworth, B.E. (1989). Attracting and retaining females in law enforcement: Sex-based problems of women cops in 1988.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33(3), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsey, R. (1982). Female patrol officers: A review of the physical capability issue. In B.R. Price & N.J. Sokoloff (Eds.),The criminal justice system and women. New York: Clark Boardman.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (1980).Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Sex, rule VII, Sec. 703. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Census. (1990).Statistical abstract of the United States: 1990, (110th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1990).Facts about sexual harassment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1980, November 10).Discrimination because of sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended: Adoption of final interpretive guidelines. Federal Register.

  • United States Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Policy Evaluation (1988).Sexual harassment in the federal government: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Policy Evaluation. (1981).Sexual harassment in the federal government. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verespej, M. (1991). Arbitration: The newest legal option.Industry Week, 240(14), 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R.L., & Steel, B.S. (1989a). Affirmative action in times of fiscal stress and hanging value priorities: The case of women in policing.Public Personnel Management, 18(3), 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, A. (1991, November 3). What is sexual harassment? And how do you stop it?El Paso Times, p. 4G.

  • Weber-Burdin, E., & Rossi, P. (1982). Defining sexual harassment on campus: A replication and extension.Journal of Social Issues, 38(4), 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, E.L., Bales, J.M., Garbin, A.P., & Blount, J. (1986). The transformation of sexual harassment from a private trouble into a public issue.Sociological Inquiry, 56, 432–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workforce 2000 Report: Competing in a Seller’s Market. (1989). (A Survey Report of Corporate Responses to Demographic and Labor Force Changes). Hudson Institute/ Towers Perrin.

  • Wright, C. (1991). G.I. Jill.The New Republic, 205, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

Cases Cited

  • Bundy v. Jackson CADC, 641 F2d 934, 205 U.S. App DC 444 (1981).

  • Ellison v. Brady CA9 (CAL), 942 Fd 872 (1991).

  • Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc. WL 453611 (1993).

  • Pulido v. State of California (1994) Marin County Superior Court

  • Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards 760 F. Supp. 1486, 118 F.R.D. 525 (1991).

  • Vinson v. Meritor Savings and Loan 106 SCT 2399, 477 US 57 (1986).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boise State University, USA

    Mary K. Stohr

  2. Otterbein College, USA

    Ann C. Beck

Authors
  1. Mary K. Stohr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann C. Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stohr, M.K., Beck, A.C. “He said, she said”: Sexual harassment in the fractured criminal justice work place. AJCJ 18, 235–257 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887500

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887500

Keywords

  • Criminal Justice
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Criminal Justice System
  • Affirmative Action
  • Work Place