Skip to main content
Log in

Fraud victimization: Risky business or just bad luck?

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Victimology theory recognizes that the characteristics, attitudes, and behaviors of potential victims influence the likelihood of criminal victimization. An important question for victimologists is whether potential victims put themselves at risk by engaging in risky behavior or whether victimization is primarily a result of bad luck. While this question has been investigated extensively with respect to street crime victimization, little attempt has been made to apply it to victimization by fraud. This article investigates the influence of attitudes toward financial risk taking on the likelihood of fraud victimization. Using data from a telephone survey of 400 randomly sampled respondents, we find that age and attitudes toward financial risk taking are significantly related to the likelihood of attempted victimizations but not to successful victimizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amir, M. (1971).Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneklev, B., Grasmick, H., Tittle, C., & Bursik, R. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(3), 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bequai, A. (1978).White-collar crime: A 20th century crisis. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, R. H. (1972).Deceivers and deceived. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. M. (1992).Fraud victimization survey, 1990. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delord-Raynal, Y. (1982).Victims of white-collar crimes. In H. J. Schneider (Ed.),The victim in international perspective (pp. 257–273). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah, E. A. (1993). The rational choice/opportunity perspectives as a vehicle for integrating criminological and victimological theories. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.),Routine activity and rational choice: Vol. 5. Advances in criminological theory (pp. 225–258). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

  • Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M., & Garofalo, J. (1978).Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesilow, P., Klemper, E., & Chiao, V. (1992). Reporting consumer and major fraud: A survey of complainants. In K. Schlegel & D. Weisburd (Eds.),White collar crime reconsidered (pp. 149–168). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmen, A. (1984). The victim’s role in crime. InCrime victims: An introduction to victimology (pp. 72–93). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J. C. R. (1939).Crime in business. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, G. E. (1986).Dictionary of criminal justice (2nd ed.). Guilford, CT: Dushkin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. D., & Pitts, V. L. (1995). A feminist routine activities approach to explaining sexual assault.Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shover, N., Fox, G. L., & Mills, M. (1994). Long-term consequences of victimization by white-collar crime.Justice Quarterly, 11, 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, E. H. (1975). Fraud, dispute and the consumer: Responding to consumer complaints.University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 123, 1107–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titus, R. M., Heinzelman, F., & Boyle, J. M. (1995). Victimization of persons by fraud.Crime and Delinquency, 41(1), 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D., & Carlo, G. (1975). The appliance repairman: A study of victim-responsiveness and fraud.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D., & Carlo, G. (1976). Victims of fraud: Victim responsiveness, incidence, and reporting. In E. Viano (Ed.),Victims and society (pp. 403–422). Washington, DC: Visage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hentig, H. (1947).Crime: Causes and conditions. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. E., & Schram, D. D. (1980). The victim of white-collar crime: Accuser or accused? In G. Geis & E. Stotland (Eds.),White-collar crime: Theory and research (pp. 32–51). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E. (1974). Victim-precipitated homicide. In I. Drapkin & E. Viano (Eds.),Victimology (pp. 79–92). Toronto: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E. (1982). Basic concepts in victimological theory: Individualization of the victim. In H. J. Schneider (Ed.),The victim in international perspective. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Wyk, J., Benson, M.L. Fraud victimization: Risky business or just bad luck?. Am J Crim Just 21, 163–179 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887448

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887448

Keywords

Navigation