Skip to main content
Log in

The treatment ideal and detention reality: Demographic, professional/ occupational and organizational influences on detention worker punitiveness

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For some time, corrections researchers have focused on the punitive and rehabilitative orientations of correctional officers. Relatively little research attention, however, has been devoted to understanding the support for these orientations among correctional workers responsible for the care and custody of juvenile delinquents. Based on survey data drawn from a sample of detention care workers (DCWs) in two facilities in a Southeastern state (N=109), this paper examines the extent to which, and why, DCWs adopt a punitive orientation to youth in detention despite policies and training that discourage this view. Findings, that contrast the relative impact of demographic, occupational/professional and organizational environment variables in accounting for variation in punishment/control orientation among DCWs, suggest that demographic indicators (i.e., age, gender) and organizational environment contribute disproportionately to explained variance in punitive orientation once other variables are controlled. Implications for detention policy, staff recruitment and training are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartollas, C., Miller, S.J., & Dinitz, S. (1976).Juvenile victimization: The institutional paradox. New York: Halstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazemore, G., Dicker, T.J., & Nyhan, R. (1994). Juvenile justice reform and the difference it makes: An exploratory study of the impact of policy change on detention worker attitudes.Crime & Delinquency, 40, 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.E. (1975).Delinquency dispositions: An empirical analysis of processing decisions in three juvenile courts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, B., & Alpert, G. (1982). Sex and occupational socialization among prison guards: A longitudinal study.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 159–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F.T. (1989). The correctional orientation of prison guards: Do officers support rehabilitation?Federal Probation, 53, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F.T., Gilbert, K.E., & Cullen, J.B. (1983). Implementing determinate sentencing in Illinois: Conscious and convenient.Criminal Justice Review, 8, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F.T., Latessa, E.J., Burton, V.S., Jr., & Lombardo, L.X. (1993). The correctional orientation of prison wardens: Is the rehabilitative ideal supported?Criminology, 31, 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F.T., Link, B.G., Wolfe, N.T., & Frank, J. (1985). The social dimensions of correctional officer stress.Justice Quarterly, 2, 505–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M.J., & Sanniti, C. (1993). Litigation as an instrument for change in juvenile detention: A case study.Crime & Delinquency, 39, 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R., & Dertke, M. (1986). Work environment correlates of staff stress in a youth detention facility.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B.C. (1977).Neutralizing inmate violence: Juvenile offenders in institutions. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B.C. (1991).Transformed but unreformed: Juvenile court and the criminal alternative. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, C.F. (1989). Preadjucatory detention. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.),Juvenile justice: Policies, programs, and services (pp. 143–162). Chicago: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, C.F., & Bishop, D. (1985). The pre-trail detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, C.F., & Cochran, J.K. (1986). Detention of juveniles: Its effects on subsequent juvenile court processing decisions.Youth and Society, 17, 286–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, J.R. (1987). The prison control structure and its effects on work attitudes: The perceptions and attitudes of prison guards.Journal of Criminal Justice, 15, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, J.R., & Albonetti, C. (1980). Role conflict in correctional institutions.Criminology, 17, 445–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, W.F., & Slocum, J.W. (1984). Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations.Academy of Management Journal, 27, 721–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurik, N.C. (1985). Individual and organizational determinants of correctional officer attitudes toward inmates.Criminology, 23, 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofas, J. (1986). Discretion among correctional officers: The influence of urbanization, age, and race.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 30, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofas, J., & Toch, H. (1982). The guard subculture myth.Journal of Research In Crime and Delinquency, 19, 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, B., Thornberry, T., & Austin, J. (1989).Juveniles taken into custody: Developing national statistics. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, L.X. (1989).Guard imprisoned: Correctional officers at work. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz, R.E., Poole, D., & Regoli, R.M. (1985).Juvenile delinquency and juvenile justice. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, K. B., Gramling, L. K., & Gardner, W. M. (1985). A scale to measure attitudes toward prisoners.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, M.D., & Burbidge, G.S. (1991). Attitudes of youth corrections professionals toward juvenile justice reform and policy alternatives: A Utah survey.Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.F., & DeCotis, T.A. (1983). Organizational determinants of job stress.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 160–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, E.D., & Pogrebin, M.R. (1988). Deputy sheriffs as jail guards: A study of correctional policy orientations and career phases.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 190–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, E.D., & Regoli, R.M. (1980). Role stress, custody orientation and disciplinary actions: A study of prison guards.Criminology, 18, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarri, R. (1974).Under lock and key: Juveniles in jail and detention: National assessment of juvenile corrections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H. (1985).Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., & Rentsch, J.R. (1988). Managing climates and cultures: A futures perspective. In J. Hage (Ed.),Futures of organizations (pp. 181–200). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I., Fishman, G., Hatfleld, R., Krisberg, B., & Eisikovitz, E. (1987). Juvenile detention: The hidden closet revisited.Justice Quarterly, 4, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I., & Van Vleet, R. (1992). Public policy and the incarceration of juveniles. In I. Schwartz (Ed.),Juvenile justice and public policy (pp. 151–164). New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., & Drory, A. (1982). Occupational tedium among prison officers.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluder, R.D., Shearer, R., & Potts, D. (1991). Probation officers’ role perceptions and attitudes toward firearms.Federal Probation, 55, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1983).Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J.T., & Lindquist, C.A. (1989). Determinants of correctional officers’ professional orientation.Justice Quarterly, 6, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J.T., & Lindquist, C.A. (1992). Determinants of probation and parole officer professional orientation.Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 13–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazemore, G., Dicker, T.J. & Al-Gadheeb, H. The treatment ideal and detention reality: Demographic, professional/ occupational and organizational influences on detention worker punitiveness. AJCJ 19, 21–41 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887437

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887437

Keywords

Navigation