Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of recidivism among “second timers” in the juvenile justice system: Efficiency in screening chronic offenders

  • Articles
  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identification of small subgroups of high-risk juvenile offenders from the general population to target them for intervention has proved elusive. It is argued that second-time delinquents represent a group that can be efficiently screened for chronic offenders. With a sample of 298 second-time juvenile offenders, both prospective and retrospective risk instruments are found to predict chronic delinquent behavior well. It is proposed that such risk instruments be used to focus benign intervention on high-risk, second-time juvenile offenders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschuler, D. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1992).Intensive community-based aftercare program: Training manual for action planning conference. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altschuler, D. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1994).Intensive aftercare for high-risk juveniles: A community care model. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsley, D. F. (1991).Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., & Visher, C. (Eds.) (1986).Criminal careers and “career criminals.” (Vol. I). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Farrington, D. P., & Moitra, S. (1985). Delinquency careers: Innocents, amateurs, and persisters. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.),Crime and justice: An annual review of research. (Vol. 6). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K., & Jackman, R. W. (1990). Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. In J. Fox & J. Scott Long (Eds.),Modern methods of data analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, M. S. (1993).Reduced recidivism and increased employment opportunity through research-based reading instruction. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copas, J. B., & Tarling, R. (1986). Some methodological issues in making predictions. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. Roth, & C. Visher (Eds.),Criminal careers and “career criminals.” (Vol. I). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno, D. (1985). Sociological and human developmental explanations of crime: Conflict or consensus.Criminology, 23, 711–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1983).Further analyses of a longitudinal survey of crime and delinquency. Cambridge, England: Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1987). Early precursors of frequent offending. In J. Q. Wilson & G. C. Loury (Eds.),From children to citizens: Families, schools, and delinquency prevention (Vol. III) (pp. 27–50). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W. B., & Schmidt, L. (1996). Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: Concurrent and predictive validity for African-Americans and Caucasians.Criminology, 34, 493–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D. M., Fifield, J. K., & Slater, S. W. (1977). Signal detectability theory and the evaluation of prediction tables.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 14, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P., Cullen, F., & Bonta, D. (1994). Intensive rehabilitation supervision: The next generation in community corrections.Federal Probation, 58, 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1987). Prediction in criminal justice policy development. In D. M. Gottfredson & M. Tonry (Eds.),Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making. (Vol. 9) (pp. 103–150). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. M., Wilkins, L. T., & Hoffman, P. B. (1978).Guidelines for parole and sentencing. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, S. D. (1987). Prediction: An overview of selected methodological issues. In D. M. Gottfredson & M. Tonry (Eds.),Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making. (Vol. 9) (pp. 21–52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, S. D., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1986). Accuracy of prediction models. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. Roth, & C. Visher (Eds.).Criminal careers and “career criminals.” (Vol. II) (pp. 212–290). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. W., & Zimring, F. E. (1985).One more chance: The pursuit of promising intervention strategies for chronic juvenile offenders. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (1992).Communities that care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvenile Delinquency Commission. (1991).The chronic juvenile offender: A challenge to New Jersey’s juvenile justice system. Trenton, NJ: Juvenile Delinquency Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, B., Currie, E., & Onek, D. (1995). What works with juvenile offenders.American Bar Association Journal on Criminal Justice, 10, 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, M. (1998). Screening of serious and violent juvenile offenders: Identification, classification, and prediction. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.),Serious and violent juvenile offenders, (pp. 167–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. J. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review.Psychology Bulletin, 94, 68–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A., & Christiansen, K. O. (Eds.) (1977).The biosocial bases of criminal behavior. New York: Garden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy.Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictors of violence: Being accurate about accuracy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D., & Farrington, D. P. (1992). The onset and persistence of offending.Criminology, 30, 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. T. (n.d.)Testing the effectiveness of the Project Success Postsecondary Transition Program for Adults with Learning Disabilities. Oshkosh: University of Wisconsin.

  • Patterson, G. R. (1982).A social learning approach: Coercive family process (Vol. 3). Eugene, OR: Castalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. R., Fabiano, E. O., & Ewles, C. D. (1988). Reasoning and rehabilitation.International Journal of Offender Therapy, 32, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1993).Crime in the making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. R. (1996). The effects of base rate and cutoff point choice on commonly used measures of association and accuracy in recidivism research.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 83–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. R., Aloisi, M. F., & Goldstein, H. (1996).Early court intervention: A research and intervention project. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N. (1988).Court careers of juvenile offenders. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, P. E., Wolfgang, M. E., & Figlio, R. M. (1985).Delinquency in two birth cohorts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebush, R. G., Baird, C., Krisberg, B., & Onek, D. (1995) Risk assessment and classification for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.),Sourcebook on serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972).Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M., Thornberry, T. P., & Figlio, R. M. (1987).From boy to man, from delinquency to crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, W.R., Aloisi, M.F. Prediction of recidivism among “second timers” in the juvenile justice system: Efficiency in screening chronic offenders. Am J Crim Just 23, 201–222 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887272

Keywords

Navigation