Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating

  • Articles
  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using scenario-based survey data from a sample of 330 university students, this study examined the effects of low self-control, rational choice variables, and control measures on intentions to cheat on a college exam. A moderate bivariate association was observed between low self-control and cheating intentions. However, a series of multivariate regression equations showed that low selfcontrol did not have a significant effect on intentions to cheat once the influence of other variables, especially anticipated shame, were controlled. Furthermore, findings supported the rational choice framework in explaining student decisions to cheat. Implications regarding these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers, R. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alschuler, A., and Blimling, G. (1995). Curbing epidemic cheating through systemic change.College Teaching, 43, 123–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneklev, B., Cochran, J., & Gainey, R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s low self-control stability hypothesis: An exploratory study.American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneklev, B., Grasmick, H., Tittle, C., & Bursik, R. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault.Law and Society Review, 26, 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H. (1991). Explaining crimes and analogous acts, or the unrestrained will grab at pleasure whenever they can.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. L., & Moore, E. (1992). Are white-collar and common offenders the same?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. (1984). Legal and extralegal barriers to delinquency.Criminology, 22, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownfield, D., & Sorenson, A. (1993). Self-control and juvenile delinquency: Theoretical issues and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a general theory of crime.Deviant Behavior, 4, 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, D., Caudill, S., & Gropper, D. (1992). Crime in the classroom: An economic analysis of undergraduate student cheating behavior.Research in Economic Education, 23, 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, V. S., Cullen, F., Evans, T. D., & Dunaway, R. (1994). Reconsidering strain theory: Operationalization, rival theories, and adult criminality.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (1986).The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coston, C. T., & Jenks, D. (1998). Exploring academic dishonesty among under criminal justice majors: A research note.American Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. & Ludvigson, H. (1995). Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation.Teaching of Psychology, 22, 119–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elis, L., & Simpson, S. (1995). Informal sanction threats and corporate crime: Additive versus multiplicative models.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskridge, C., & Ames, G. (1993). Attitudes about cheating and self-reported cheating behaviors of criminal justice majors and non-criminal justice majors: A research note.Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 4, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D., Cullen, F., Burton, V., Dunaway, R., & Benson, M. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime.Criminology, 35, 475–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Newstead, S. (1995). Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why?Studies in Higher Education, 20, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genereux, R., & McLeod, B. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students.Research in Higher Education, 36, 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J., & Giever, D. (1995). Self-control and its manifestations among university students: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory.Justice Quarterly, 12, 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990).A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H., & Bursik, R. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model.Law and Society Review, 24, 837–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H., Bursik, R., & Arneklev, B. (1993). Reduction in drunk driving as a response to increased threats of shame, embarrassment, and legal sanctions.Criminology, 31, 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H., Bursik, R., & Kinsey, K. (1991). Shame and embarrassment as deterrents to noncompliance with the law.Environment and Behavior, 23, 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H., Tittle, C., Bursik, R., & Arneklev, B. (1993). Testing the core implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpp, D., & Hogan, J. (1993). Crime in the classroom: Detection and prevention of cheating on multiple-choice exams,Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1988).Seductions of crime. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, C., Maxim, P., & Teevan, J. (1993). Drinking and driving, self-control, and gender: Testing a general theory of crime.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. (1989). Tax compliance and perceptions of the risks of detection and criminal prosecution.Law and Society Review, 23, 209–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Klug, M. (1986). Learning to cheat: The interaction of moral-development and social learning theories.Deviant Behavior, 7, 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. (1978). Deviant involvement, associations and attitudes: Specifying the underlying causal structures.Sociology and Social Research, 63, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Kaplan, H. (1996). Gender-related differences in circumstances surrounding initiation and escalation of alcohol and other substance use/abuse.Deviant Behavior, 17, 71–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. (1985). The standard of proof in student disciplinary cases.Journal of College and University Law, 12, 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity.Criminology, 34, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maramark, S., & Maline, M. (1993). Academic dishonesty among college students. Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, C., & Smith, C. (1985). Moral reasoning and moral conduct: An investigation prompted by Kohlberg’s theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1016–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marenin, O., & Reisig, M. (1995). A general theory of crime and patterns of crime in Nigeria: An exploration of methodological assumptions.Journal of Criminal Justice, 6, 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., & Bowers, W. (1994). Academic dishonesty among males in college: A thirty year perspective.Journal of College Student Development, 35, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. (1996). What we know about cheating in college: Longitudinal trends and recent developments.Change, 28, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J., & Miethe, T. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating.Social Science Quarterly, 70, 872–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime.Law and Society Review, 27, 467–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., & Piquero, A. (1995). Reconceptualizing deterrence: An empirical test of personal and vicarious experiences.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 251–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., & Simpson, S. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime.Law and Society Review, 30, 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I., Gartner, R., Thornton, C., & Matsueda, R. (1986). Crime, deterrence and rational choice.American Sociological Review, 51, 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A., & Tibbetts, S. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low selfcontrol and situational factors in decision-making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending.Justice Quarterly, 13, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polakowski, M. (1994). Linking self and social control with deviance: Illuminating the structure underlying a general theory of crime.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 41–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polk, K. (1991).A general theory of crime (book review).Crime and Delinquency, 37, 575–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, C., & McLaughlin, G. (1989). An analysis of predictors of college students’ ethical inclinations.Research in Higher Education, 30, 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (1986). Public university responses to academic dishonesty: Disciplinary or academic.Journal of Law and Education, 15, 369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., & Toombs, R. (1993). A scale to assess perceptions of cheating in examination-related situations.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 755–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M., & Ballew, C. (1994). Attitudes toward cheating of self and others by college students and professors.Psychological Record, 44, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, D., & Olswang, S. (1981). Academic misconduct: The due process rights of students.NASPA Journal, 19, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. (1992).A general theory of crime (book review).Social Forces, 71, 545–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S., & Koper, C. (1992). Deterring corporate crime.Criminology, 30, 347–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices.Journal of Education for Business, 69, 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, K. L. (1991). Contemporary theories of crime: Control and socialization.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 491–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, S., & Crown, D. (1995). Changes over time in academic dishonesty at the collegiate level.Psychological Reports, 76, 763–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. J. (1989). On the causes of “white-collar” crime: An assessment of Hirschi and Gottfredson’s claims.Criminology, 27, 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G., & Stevens, F. (1987). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s managers revisited: How and why students cheat?Journal of Education for Business, 63, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. (1997). Shame and rational choice in offending decisions.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 234–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S., & Herz, D. (1996). Gender differences in factors of social control and rational choice.Deviant Behavior, 17, 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. (1991).A general theory of crime (book review).American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1609–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., & Hawkins, R. (1989). The meaning of arrest for wife assault.Criminology, 27, 163–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P., Pfefferbaum, B., & Arneklev, B. (1993). Risk-taking and self-control: Social psychological correlates of delinquency.Journal of Crime and Justice, 16, 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

Cases Cited

  • Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978).

  • Clayton v. Trustees of Princeton University, 608 F. Supp. 413 (D.C.N.J. 1985).

  • Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F. 2d 150 (5th Cir. 1959), cert. den., 368 U.S. 930 (1961).

  • Ewing v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, 54 U.S. 4055 (1985).

  • Hension v. Honor Committee of University of Virginia, 719 F. 2d 69 (4th Cir. 1983).

  • Jaska v. Regents of the University of Michigan, 597 F. Supp. 1245 (E.D. Mich. 1983).

  • Nash v. Auburn University, 621 F. Supp. 948 (M.D. Ala. 1985).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, East Tennessee State University, 37614, Johnson City, TN

    Stephen G. Tibbetts

  2. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA

    David L. Myers

Authors
  1. Stephen G. Tibbetts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David L. Myers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tibbetts, S.G., Myers, D.L. Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating. Am J Crim Just 23, 179–200 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887271

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887271

Keywords

Search

Navigation