Skip to main content
Log in

Separation of CD34 positive cells and determinationof surface homing antigen

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To study the differences in homing potential between bone marrow cells and umbilical blood cells, CD34 positive cells were obtained from bone marrow (BM) and umbilical blood (UB) by the direct cell separation with domestic immunomagnetic beads. The expression of the two adhesion molecules CDlla/CD18 and CD44 were examined. After separation, CD34 positive cells accounted for 51%–82% of the harvested cells and dye-resistance rate was 82%–88%. The expression of CD1WCD18 and CD44 on the surfaces of UB cells was 49.6%±10.2% and 37.7%±10.3% respectively. On BM cells they were 50.2%±6.2% and 34%±13.3% respectively. There were no significant differences in the expression of these two molecules. It was concluded that the cell separation method with domestic immunomagnetic beads was effective and the stem cells from UB could serve as an alternative source for transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ugelstad J, Soderberg L, Berge Aet al. Monodisperse polymer particles —a step forward for chromatography. Nature, 1983, 303:95

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardingham J E, Kotasek D, Farmer Bet al. Immunobead PCR: A technique for the detection of circulating tumor cells using immunomagnetic beads and the polymerase chain reaction. Can Res, 1993, 53:34, 553.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Uhlen M. Magnetic separation of DNA. Nature, 1989, 40:733

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Enroth H, Engstrand L. Immunomagnetic separation and PCR for detection of Helicobacter Pylori in water and stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol, 1995, 33:2162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Long M W. Blood cell cytoadhension molecules. Exp Hematol, 1992, 20:228

    Google Scholar 

  6. Papayannopoulou T, Craddock C. Homing and trafficking of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Acta Hematol, 1997, 97:97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reuss-Borst M A, Bullring H J, Klein Get al. Adhension molecules on CD34+ hematopoietic cells in normal human bone marrow and leukemia. Ann Hematol, 1992, 65:169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reems J A, Mielcarek M, Torok-Storb B. Differential modulation of adhension markers with ex vivo expression of human umbilical CD34+ progenitor cells. Bone Marrow Transplant, 1997, 3:113

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watanabe T, Dare B, Heimann D Get al. GM-CSF mobilized peripheral blood CD34+ cells differ from steadystate bone marrow CD34+ cells in adhension molecule expression. Bone Marrow Transplant, 1997, 19:1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liangli, W., Ping, Z. & Yong, Y. Separation of CD34 positive cells and determinationof surface homing antigen. Current Medical Science 20, 132–133 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887051

Key words

Navigation