Skip to main content
Log in

Inmate attitudes toward the conjugal visitation program in Mississippi prisons: An exploratory study

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast attitudes of Mississippi inmates who participate in a conjugal visitation program with inmates who do not participate in such a program. Logistic regression analyses reveal no differences between participant and nonparticipant attitudes toward the conjugal visitation program. However, differences exist among gender and racial lines and several of the attitudinal issues regarding the program. Policy implications are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balogh, J. (1964). Conjugal visitations in prisons: A sociological perspective.Federal Probation, 28-29, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. A. (1989). Correctional administrators’ attitudes toward private family visiting.The Prison Journal, 66, 110–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, J. (1977).Conjugal visits in prison: Psychological and social consequences. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetting, A. (1982). Conjugal association in prison: Issues and perspectives.Crime and Delinquency, 28, 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J., & McConnell, E. (1999). Are conjugal and familial visitations effective rehabilitative concepts?The Prison Journal, 79, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, C., Rutland, S., & Gray-Ray, P. (2000). The effects of the conjugal visitation program on Mississippi inmates.Corrections Compendium, 26(4), 1–3, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, C., Rutland, S., Gray-Ray, P., & Durant, L. (in press). Conjugal visitations in Mississippi.The Researcher.

  • Holt, N. & Miller, D. (1972).Explorations in inmate-family relations. Sacramento, CA: Department of Corrections Research Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, C. (1969).Sex in prison. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, C. (1989). The evolution of conjugal visiting in Mississippi.The Prison Journal, 69, 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, D. R. (1971). Alternatives to conjugal visiting.Federal Probation, 35(3), 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutland, S. (1995).Examining the effects of conjugal visitations within the Mississippi department of corrections: Family stability, violence, and homosexuality. Unpublished master’s thesis, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.

  • Sullivan, R. (1970). The pros and cons of conjugal visits in prison institutions.Journal of Family Law, 9, 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. B. (1993).Brokered justice: Race, politics, and the Mississippi prisons, 1798–1992. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Cases Cited

  • Gates v. Collier, 349 F. Supp. 881 (N.D.Miss., 1971).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Hensley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hensley, C., Rutland, S. & Gray-Ray, P. Inmate attitudes toward the conjugal visitation program in Mississippi prisons: An exploratory study. Am J Crim Just 25, 137–145 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886816

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886816

Keywords

Navigation