Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of pressure on intracardiac backscatter from microbubbles

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The backscatter from sonicated albumin microbubbles (Albunex) was analyzed using acoustic densitometry in anin vitro pulsatile heart model to evaluate the effects of pressure on the backscatter from Albunex, and the cardiac cyclic changes of intracardiac backscatter from sonicated albumin microbubbles in 16 healthy persons were analyzed. It was found that the Albunex microbubbles were compressed in systole and decompressed in diastole, causing corresponding changes of backscatter in cardiac cycle. Although the intensities of backscatter in diastole and systole were related to the concentration of microbubbles, the concentration of microbubbles had no effect on the difference of end-diastolic and end-systolic backscatter. The difference of the backscatter was highly correlated with end-systolic pressure (r=0.96,P = 0.001). In human studies, we also observed same intracardiac cyclic changes of backscatter from sonicated albumin microbubbles. Our study indicates that it is possible to evaluate the intracardiac pressure non-invasively by analyzing the intracardiac backscatter from the microbubbles with acoustic densitometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shapiro J R, Rrisner S A. Lichtenberg G Set al. Intravenous contrast echocardiography with use of sonicated albumin in humans: systolic disappearance of left ventricular contrast after transpulmonary transmission. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990,16:1603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brayman A A, Azadniv M, Miller M Wet al. Effect of static pressure on acoustic transmittance of Albunex microbubbles suspensions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1996, 99:2403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gottlieb S, Ernst A, Meltzer R S. Effect of pressure on echocardiographic videodensity from sonicated albumin: Anin vitro model. J Ultrasound Med. 1995,14:109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vuille C, Nidorf M, Morrisey RLet al. Effect of static pressure on the disappearance rate of specific echocardiographic contrast agents. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1994,7:347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mor-Avi V, Shorff S G, Robinson K Aet al. Effect of left ventricular pressure on sonicated albumin microbubbles: Evaluation using an isolated rabbit heart model. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994,24:1779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ismail S, Anderson T A. Integrated backscatter and digital acquisition during myocardial contrast echocardiography: Is there an advantage over conventional echocardiography for intracoronary injections? J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1995,8:453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Waltman T, Undesser K, Kwan O Let al. Variables capable of influencing videointensity measurements from left ventricular contrast opacification. Circulation, 1993, 88(4, part 2):1–162

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morse P M, Ingard K U. Theoretical Acoustics. New York, McGrawHill. 1968, 400

    Google Scholar 

  9. Powsner S M, Marcus R S. Quantitation of echo contrast effects. Am J Physiol Imaging, 1986,1:124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This Project was supported by a grant from the National Sciences Foundtion of China (No. 39970308).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Youbin, D., Chunlei, L. & Qing, C. Effect of pressure on intracardiac backscatter from microbubbles. Current Medical Science 21, 246–248 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886444

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886444

Key words

Navigation