Summary
The backscatter from sonicated albumin microbubbles (Albunex) was analyzed using acoustic densitometry in anin vitro pulsatile heart model to evaluate the effects of pressure on the backscatter from Albunex, and the cardiac cyclic changes of intracardiac backscatter from sonicated albumin microbubbles in 16 healthy persons were analyzed. It was found that the Albunex microbubbles were compressed in systole and decompressed in diastole, causing corresponding changes of backscatter in cardiac cycle. Although the intensities of backscatter in diastole and systole were related to the concentration of microbubbles, the concentration of microbubbles had no effect on the difference of end-diastolic and end-systolic backscatter. The difference of the backscatter was highly correlated with end-systolic pressure (r=0.96,P = 0.001). In human studies, we also observed same intracardiac cyclic changes of backscatter from sonicated albumin microbubbles. Our study indicates that it is possible to evaluate the intracardiac pressure non-invasively by analyzing the intracardiac backscatter from the microbubbles with acoustic densitometry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shapiro J R, Rrisner S A. Lichtenberg G Set al. Intravenous contrast echocardiography with use of sonicated albumin in humans: systolic disappearance of left ventricular contrast after transpulmonary transmission. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990,16:1603
Brayman A A, Azadniv M, Miller M Wet al. Effect of static pressure on acoustic transmittance of Albunex microbubbles suspensions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1996, 99:2403
Gottlieb S, Ernst A, Meltzer R S. Effect of pressure on echocardiographic videodensity from sonicated albumin: Anin vitro model. J Ultrasound Med. 1995,14:109
Vuille C, Nidorf M, Morrisey RLet al. Effect of static pressure on the disappearance rate of specific echocardiographic contrast agents. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1994,7:347
Mor-Avi V, Shorff S G, Robinson K Aet al. Effect of left ventricular pressure on sonicated albumin microbubbles: Evaluation using an isolated rabbit heart model. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994,24:1779
Ismail S, Anderson T A. Integrated backscatter and digital acquisition during myocardial contrast echocardiography: Is there an advantage over conventional echocardiography for intracoronary injections? J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1995,8:453
Waltman T, Undesser K, Kwan O Let al. Variables capable of influencing videointensity measurements from left ventricular contrast opacification. Circulation, 1993, 88(4, part 2):1–162
Morse P M, Ingard K U. Theoretical Acoustics. New York, McGrawHill. 1968, 400
Powsner S M, Marcus R S. Quantitation of echo contrast effects. Am J Physiol Imaging, 1986,1:124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This Project was supported by a grant from the National Sciences Foundtion of China (No. 39970308).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Youbin, D., Chunlei, L. & Qing, C. Effect of pressure on intracardiac backscatter from microbubbles. Current Medical Science 21, 246–248 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886444
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886444