Social evaluation influence on cardiovascular response to a fixed behavioral challenge: Effects across a range of difficulty levels

Abstract

Participants performed five memory tasks—ranging in difficulty from very low to very high—under public or private conditions. The publicity and difficulty variables interacted to determine systolic pressure and heart rate responses during performance. Where performance was public, responsiveness on the parameters increased with difficulty to a point and then dropped; where performance was private, responsiveness was relatively low at all difficulty levels. Diastolic pressure responses were configured similarly, although in that case the interaction was not reliable. Findings corroborate and extend results from a previous study, argue against some explanations of those results, and strengthen the case for a recent active coping analysis of cardiovascular audience effects. Findings also strengthen the case for a broader model of effort and cardiovascular response, which has potential for advancing our understanding of a range of phenomena and processes related to behavior and health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. (1)

    Triplett N: The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition.American Journal of Psychology. 1898,9: 507–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. (2)

    Burtt HE: The inspiration-expiration ratio during truth and falsehood.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1921,4: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. (3)

    Zajonc RB: Social facilitation.Science. 1965,149: 269–274.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. (4)

    Bond CF, Titus LJ: Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies.Psychological Bulletin. 1983,94: 264–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. (5)

    Geen RG, Bushman BJ: The arousing effects of social presence. In Wagner H, Manstead A (eds),Handbook of Social Psychophysiology. London: Wiley, 1989, 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  6. (6)

    Moore DL, Baron RS: Social facilitation: A psychophysiological analysis. In Cacioppo J, Petty R (eds),Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. New York: Guilford Press, 1983, 434–466.

    Google Scholar 

  7. (7)

    Allen KM, Blascovich J, Tomaka J, Kelsey RM: Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991,61: 582–589.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. (8)

    Cacioppo JT, Rourke PA, Marshall-Goodell BS, Tassinary LG, Baron RS: Rudimentary physiological effects of mere observation.Psychophysiology. 1990,27: 177–186.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. (9)

    Gerin W, Milner D, Chawla S, Pickering TG: Social support as a moderator of cardiovascular reactivity in women: A test of the direct effects and buffering hypotheses.Psychosomatic Medicine, 1995,57: 16–22.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. (10)

    Kamarck TW, Annunziato B, Amateau LM: Affiliation moderates the effects of social threat on stress-related cardiovascular responses: Boundary conditions for a laboratory model of social support.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,58: 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. (11)

    Brown PC, Smith TW: Social influence, marriage, and the heart: Cardiovascular consequences of interpersonal control in husbands and wives.Health Psychology. 1992,11: 88–96.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. (12)

    Smith TW, Nealey JB, Kircher JC, Limon J: Social determinants of cardiovascular reactivity: Effects of incentive to exert influence and evaluative threat.Psychophysiology. 1997,34: 65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. (13)

    Wright RA, Tunstall AM, Williams BJ, Goodwin JS, Harmon-Jones E: Social evaluation and cardiovascular response: An active coping approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995,69: 530–543.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. (14)

    Wright RA: Brehm's theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. In Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds),The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation and Behavior. New York: Guilford, 1996, 424–453.

    Google Scholar 

  15. (15)

    Wright RA, Dill JC: Blood pressure responses and incentive appraisals as a function of perceived ability and objective task demand.Psychophysiology. 1993,30: 152–160.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. (16)

    Wright RA, Williams BJ, Dill JC: Interactive effects of difficulty and instrumentality of avoidant behavior on cardiovascular reactivity.Psychophysiology. 1992,29: 677–689.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. (17)

    Obrist PA: The cardiovascular-behavioral interaction as it appears today.Psychophysiology. 1976,13: 95–107.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. (18)

    Obrist PA:Cardiovascular Psychophysiology: A Perspective. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. (19)

    Brehm JW Self E: The intensity of motivation. In Rozenweig MR, Porter LW (eds),Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1989,40: 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  20. (20)

    Baumeister RF: A self-presentational view of social phenomena.Psychological Bulletin. 1982,91: 656–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. (21)

    Geen RG: Social motivation. In Rozenweig MR, Porter LW (eds),Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1991,42: 377–399.

    Google Scholar 

  22. (22)

    Seta JJ, Seta CE: The impact of personal equity processes on performance in a group setting. In Paulus PB (ed),Basic Group Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983, 121–147.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. (23)

    Murray JB, Wright RA, Williams BJ: Difficulty as a determinant of cardiovascular response: Moderating effect of instrumentality in an alleviation paradigm.International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1993,15: 135–145.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. (24)

    Storey PL, Wright RA, Williams BJ: Need as a moderator of the difficulty-cardiovascular response relation: The case of fluid deprivation.Journal of Psychophysiology. 1996,10: 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  25. (25)

    Wright RA, Shaw LL, Jones CR: Task demand and cardiovascular response magnitude: Further evidence of the mediating role of success importance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990,59: 1250–1260.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. (26)

    Manuck SB, Harvey SH, Lechleiter SL, Neal KS: Effects of coping on blood pressure responses to threat of aversive stimulation.Psychophysiology. 1978,15: 544–549.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. (27)

    Cottrell NB, Wack DL, Sekerak GJ, Rittle RH: Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1968,9: 245–250.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. (28)

    Bond CF: Social facilitation: A self-presentational view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982,42: 1042–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. (29)

    Paulus PB: Group influence on individual task performance. In Paulus PB (ed),Basic Group Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983, 97–120.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. (30)

    Sanders GS, Baron RS, Moore DL: Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects.Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology. 1978,14: 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. (31)

    Geen RG: Human motivation: A social psychological approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  32. (32)

    Heckhausen H:Motivation and Action. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. (33)

    Heckhausen H, Strang H: Efficiency under record performance demands: Exertion control—An individual difference variable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988,55: 489–498.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. (34)

    Geen RG: The effects of being observed on learning following success and failure experiences.Motivation and Emotion. 1979,3: 355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. (35)

    Wright RA, Dismukes A: Cardiovascular effects of experimentally induced efficacy (ability) appraisals at low and high levels of avoidant task demand.Psychophysiology. 1996,32: 172–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. (36)

    Wright RA: Ability perception and cardiovascular response to behavioral challenge. In Kofta M, Weary G, Sedek G (eds),Personal Control in Action: Cognitive and Motivational Mechanisms. New York: Plenum Press, 1998, 197–232.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. (37)

    Kukla A: Foundations of an attributional theory of performance.Psychological Review. 1972,79: 454–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. (38)

    Locke EA, Kristof AL: Volitional choices in the goal achievement process. In Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds),The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1996, 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  39. (39)

    Smith TW, Christensen AJ: Life-style and hostility. In Friedman HS (ed),Hostility, Coping, and Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992, 33–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. (40)

    Scheier MF, Carver CS: Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Health Psychology. 1985,4: 219–247.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. (41)

    Stoney CM, Davis MC, Matthews KA: Sex differences in physiological responses to stress and in coronary disease: A causal link?Psychophysiology. 1987,24: 127–131.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. (42)

    Anderson NB, McNeilly M, Myers H: A biosocial model of race differences in vascular reactivity. In Blascovich J, Katkin ES (eds),Cardiovascular Reactivity to Psychological Stress and Disease. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1993, 83–108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. (43)

    Brehm JW, Brummett BH: The emotional control of behavior. In Kofta M, Weary G, Sedek G (eds),Personal Control in Action: Cognitive and Motivational Mechanisms. New York: Plenum Press, 1998, 133–154.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. (44)

    Wright RA, Murray JB, Storey PL, Williams BJ: Ability analysis of gender relevance and sex differences in cardiovascular response to behavioral challenge.Journal of Personality and social Psychology. 1997,73: 405–417.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rex A. Wright.

Additional information

We are grateful to Thomas DiLorenzo for providing some of the experimental equipment and to Ken Spencer for preparing the computer software that presented the tasks.

Data from this study were reported previously at the 23rd meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research.

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, R.A., Dill, J.C., Geen, R.G. et al. Social evaluation influence on cardiovascular response to a fixed behavioral challenge: Effects across a range of difficulty levels. ann. behav. med. 20, 277–285 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886377

Download citation

Keywords

  • Difficulty Level
  • Audience Participant
  • Social Facilitation
  • Work Period
  • Potential Motivation