Advertisement

American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 161–184 | Cite as

The effect of race and gender on bail outcomes: A test of an interactive model

  • Charles M. Katz
  • Cassia C. Spohn
Article

Abstract

This paper responds to suggestions that researchers interested in the relationship between defendant race, defendant gender, and criminal justice outcomes broaden their focus to include pretrial decision making. We used data on defendants charged with violent felonies in Detroit Recorder’s Court to analyze the effect of race and gender on the amount of bail imposed by the judge and on the defendant’s pretrial status. We found that judges take gender, but not race, into account in determining the amount of bail for certain types of cases; more specifically, Black females faced lower bail than Black males in less serious cases. In contrast, we found that both race and gender affected the likelihood of pretrial release. White defendants were more likely than black defendants to be released pending trial and females were more likely than males to be released prior to trial. In fact, white females, white males, and black females all were more likely than black males to be released.

Keywords

Criminal Justice Black Male Black Female Pretrial Detention Female Defendant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albonetti, C.A. (1989). Bail and judicial discretion in the District of Columbia.Sociology and Social Research, 74, 40–47.Google Scholar
  2. Albonetti, C.A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion.Social Problems, 38, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albonetti, C.A., Hauser, R.M., Hagan, J., & Nagel, I.H. (1989). Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification resources in pretrial release.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldus, D.C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. (1985). Monitoring and evaluating contemporary death sentencing systems: Lessons from Georgia.U.C. Davis Law Review, 18, 1375–1407.Google Scholar
  5. Bamett, A. (1985). Some distribution patterns for the Georgia death sentence.U.C. Davis Law Review, 18, 1327–1374.Google Scholar
  6. Bases, N. G., & McDonald, W.F. (1972).Preventive detention in the District of Columbia: The first ten months. Washington, DC: Georgetown Institute on Criminal Law and Procedure.Google Scholar
  7. Black, D. (1976).The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1988).Pretrial release and detention: The Bail Reform Act of 1984. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  9. Bynum, T. (1982). Release on recognizance: Substantive or superficial reform?Criminology, 20, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, S.H., & Koch, G.G. (1976). The Influence of income and other factors on whether criminal defendants go to prison.Law and Society Review, 11, 57–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daly, K. (1987). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender and the problem of equal treatment.Social Forces, 66, 152–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly, K. (1989). Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions.Crime & Delinquency, 35, 136–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farnworth, M., & Horan, P. (1980). Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes.Social Science Research, 9, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrell, R.A., & Swigert, V.L. (1978). Prior offense record as a self-fulfilling prophecy.Law and Society Review, 12, 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feeley, M.M. (1983).Court reform on trial: Why simple solutions fail. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Foote, C. (1954). Compelling appearance in court: Administration of bail in Philadelphia.University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 102, 1031–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frazier, C.E., Bock, E.W., & Henretta, J.C. (1980). Pretrial release and bail decisions: The effects of legal, community, and personal variables.Criminology, 18, 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldkamp, J. S. (1985). Danger and detention: A second generation of bail reform.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldkamp, J.S., & Gottfredson, M. (1979). Bail decision making and pretrial detention: Surfacing judicial policy.Law and Human Behavior, 3, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawkins, D. (1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and criminal punishment.Social Forces, 65, 719–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heumann, M., & Loftin, C. (1979). Mandatory sentencing and the abolition of plea bargaining.Law and Society Review, 13, 393–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966).The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  23. Kruttschnitt, C. (1984). Sex and criminal court dispositions: The unresolved controversy.Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kruttschnitt, G., & McCarthy, D. (1985). Familial social control and pretrial sanctions: Does sex really matter?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. LaFree, G.D. (1985). Official reactions to Hispanic defendants in the Southwest.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loftin, C., Heumann, M., & McDowall, D. (1983). Mandatory sentencing and firearm violence: Evaluating an alternative to gun control.Law and Society Review, 17, 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mann, C.R. (1993).Unequal justice: A question of color. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Miethe, T.D., & Moore, C.A. (1986). Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about different treatment.The Sociological Quarterly, 27, 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagel, I. H. (1983). The legal/extra-legal controversy: Judicial decisions in pretrial release.Law and Society Review, 17, 481–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagel, S. (1969).The legal process from a behavioral perspective. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  31. National Minority Advisory Council on Criminal Justice. (1980).The inequality of justice. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  32. Patterson, E.B., & Lynch, M.J. (1991). Biases in formalized bail procedures. In M.J. Lynch & E.B. Paterson (Eds.),Race and criminal justice (pp. 36–53). New York: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
  33. Petersilia, J. (1983).Racial disparities in the criminal justice system. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  34. Reskin, B.F., & Visher, C.A. (1986). The impacts of evidence and extralegal factors in jurors’ decisions.Law and Society Review, 20, 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, T.E. (1989). Pretrial detention under the Bail Reform Act of 1984: An empirical analysis.American Criminal Law Review, 27, 1–51.Google Scholar
  36. Spohn, C. (1992). An analysis of the ‘jury trial penalty’ and its effect on Black and White defendants.The Justice Professional, 7, 93–112.Google Scholar
  37. Spohn, C. (1994). Crime and the social control of Blacks: The effect of offender/ victim race on sentences for violent felonies. In G. Bridges & M. Myers (Eds.),Inequality, crime and social control. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  38. Spohn, C. (1990). The sentencing decisions of Black and White judges: Expected and unexpected similarities.Law and Society Review, 24, 1197–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spohn, C., & Cederblom, J. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis.Justice Quarterly, 8, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spohn, C., Welch, S., & Gruhl, J. (1985). Women defendants in court: The interaction between sex and race in convicting and sentencing.Social Science Quarterly, 66, 176–185.Google Scholar
  41. Stryker, R., Nagel, I., & Hagan, J. (1983). Methodology issues in court research: Pretrial release decisions for federal defendants.Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 469–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomson, R.J., & Zingraff, M.T. (1981). Detecting sentencing disparity: Some problems and evidence.American Journal of Sociology, 86, 869–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Unnever, J.D. (1982). Direct and organizational discrimination in the sentencing of drug offenders.Social Problems, 30, 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walker, S. (1993).Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Walsh, A. (1987). The sexual stratification hypothesis and sexual assault in light of the changing conceptions of race.Criminology, 22, 147–171.Google Scholar
  46. Wheeler, G.R., & Wheeler, C.L. (1980). Reflections on legal representation of the economically disadvantage: Beyond assembly line justice.Crime & Delinquency, 26, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zatz, M.S. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles M. Katz
    • 1
  • Cassia C. Spohn
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Nebraska at OmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations