Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 386–394 | Cite as

The economics of a good party: Social mechanics and the legitimization of art/culture

Arts and Culture Symposium

Abstract

Putting value on cultural goods is a messy business. Cultural value is not just an economic act but instead part of an intense social process of valorization and legitimization. Art/culture is socially consumed and socially aware. Economic value is determined by intangible (and ephemeral) social value formed from and within specific contexts by particular people, the “scene”, so to speak. What are the mechanisms by which the social dynamics of art/culture impact its economic legitimacy? This article looks at how art/culture attains market value, focusing on the social contexts by which culture is produced, evaluated and distributed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, H. 1982.Art Worlds. Berkeley/ Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blau, J. 1989.The Shape of Culture: A Study of Contemporary Cultural Patterns in the United States. American Sociological Association Rose Monograph Series. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blumer, H. 1969. “Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection.”Sociological Quarterly 10: 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. 1993.The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Caves, R. 2000.Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  6. Christopherson, S. and M. Storper. 1986. “The City as Studio: The World as Back Lot: The Impact of Vertical Disintegration on the Location of the Modern Picture Industry.”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4: 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coe, N., and J. Johns. 2004. “Beyond Production Clusters: Towards a Critical Political Economy of Networks in the Film Industry and Television Industries” inCultural Industries and the Production of Culture edited by D. Power and A. J. Scott. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cowen, T. 1998.In Praise of Commercial Culture. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cowen, T. and A. Tabarrok. 2000. “An Economic Theory of Avant-Garde and Popular Art, or High and Low Culture.”Southern Economic Journal 67: 232–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowen, T. 2002.Creative Destruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crane, D. 1989.The Transformation of the Avant-Garde: The New York Art World, 1940–1985. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Currid, E. 2007.The Warhol Economy: How Fashion, Art and Music Drive New York City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Currid, E and J. Connolly. 2008. “Patterns of Knowledge: The Geography of Advanced Services and the Case of Art and Culture.”Annals of the Association of American Geography. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  14. DiMaggio, P. 1987. “Classification in Art.”American Sociological Review 52: 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Entwistle, J. 2006. “The Cultural Economy of Fashion Buying.” Sage:Current Sociology 54: 704–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank, T. 1998.The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counter Culture and the Rise of Hip Consumerism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Granovetter, M. 1972. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”The American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.”The American Journal of Sociology 81: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hebdidge, R. 1979.Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  20. Hirsch, P. 1972. Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems.The American Journal of Sociology 77: 639–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leibenstein, H. 1950. “Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 64: 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lloyd, R. 2006.Neo-Bohemia: Art and Commerce in the Postindustrial City. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Markusen, A. and D. Schrock. 2006. “The Artistic Dividend: Urban Artistic Specialisation and Economic Development Implications.”Urban Studies 43: 1661–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Molotch, H. 1996. “L.A. as Design Product: How Art Works in a Regional Economy” inThe City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century edited by A. J. Scott and E. W. Soja. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Molotch, H. 2002. “Place in Product.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26: 665–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Molotch, H. 2003.Where Stuff Comes From. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Power, D. and A. Scott. 2004. “A Prelude to Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture” inCultural Industries and the Production of Culture, edited by D. Power and A. J. Scott. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rantisi, N. 2004 “The Ascendance of New York Fashion.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28: 86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ridgeway, S. 1989. “Artists Groups: Patrons and Gate-keepers” inArt and Society: Readings in the Sociology of the Arts edited by A. W. Foster and J. R. Blau. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, D. 1961. “The Economics of Fashion Demand.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 376–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salganik, M., P. Dodds, and D. Watts. 2006. “Experimental Study of In-equality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market.”Science 311: 854–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scott, A. 2000.The Cultural Economy of Cities. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Scott, A. 2005.On Hollywood: The Place, The Industry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Simmel, G. (Originally 1904) 1957. “Fashion.”The American Journal of Sociology 52: 541–548.Google Scholar
  35. Veblen, T. (Originally 1899). 1994.The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  36. Velthuis, O. 2004. “Symbolic Meanings of Prices: Constructing the Value of Contemporary Art in Amsterdam and New York Galleries.”Theory and Society 32: 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walker, R. (2004). The Corporate Manufacture of Word of Mouth.New York Times Magazine. December 5th: 70.Google Scholar
  38. Wolff, J. 1993.The Social Production of Art. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Policy, Planning, and DevelopmentUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations