Skip to main content
Log in

Health effects of caregiving: The caregiver health effects study: An ancillary study of the cardiovascular health study

  • Mini-Series
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

We propose that two related sources of variability in studies of caregiving health effects contribute to an inconsistent pattern of findings: the sampling strategy used, and the definition of what constitutes caregiving. Samples are often recruited through selfreferral and are typically comprised of caregivers experiencing considerable distress. In this study, we examine the health effects of caregiving in large population-based samples of spousal caregivers and controls using a wide array of objective and self-report physical and mental health outcome measures. By applying different definitions of caregiving, we show that the magnitude of health effects attributable to caregiving can vary substantially, with the largest negative health effects observed among caregivers who characterize themselves as being strained. From an epidemiological perspective, our data show that approximately 80% of persons living with a spouse with a disability provide care to their spouse, but only half of care providers report mental or physical strain associated with caregiving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biegel DE, Sales E, Schulz R:Family Caregiving in Chronic Illness: Alzheimer’s Disease, Cancer, Heart Disease, Mental Illness, and Stroke. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schulz R, Visintainer P, Williamson GM: Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of caregiving.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences. 1990,45: P181-P191.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulz R, O’Brien AT, Bookwala J, Fleissner K: Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of Alzheimer’s disease caregiving: Prevalence, correlates, and causes.Gerontologist. 1995,35: 771–791.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moritz DJ, Kasl SV, Ostfeld AM: The health impact of living with a cognitively impaired elderly spouse.Journal of Aging and Health. 1992,4: 244–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grafstrom M, Fratiglioni L, Sandman P-O, Winblad B: Health and social consequences for relatives of demented and non-demented elderly. A population-based study.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1992,45: 861–870.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Uchino BN, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Cacioppo JT: Age-related changes in cardiovascular response as a function of a chronic stressor and social support.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992,63: 839–846.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Bailey SL, Young HM, McCann BS: Psychosocial factors associated with cardiovascular reactivity in older adults.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1993,55: 164–177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vitaliano PP, Russo J, Niaura R: Plasma lipids and their relationships with psychosocial factors in older adults.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences. 1995,50B: P18-P24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, et al.: The Cardiovascular Health Study: Design and rationale.Annals of Epidemiology. 1991,1:263–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tell GS, Fried LP, Hermanson B, et al.: Recruitment of adults 65 years and older as participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study.Annals of Epidemiology. 1993,3: 358–366.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schulz R, Mittelmark M, Kronmal R, et al.: Predictors of perceived health status in elderly men and women: The Cardiovascular Health Study.Journal of Aging and Health. 1994,6: 419–447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fulton JP, Katz S, Jack SS, Hendershot GE:Physical Functioning of the Aged: United States, 1984. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics, Series 10, No. 167. DHHS (PHS) Publication No. 89-1595. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cornoni-Huntley J, Brock DB, Ostfeld AM, et al. (eds):Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly: Resource Data Book, NIH Publication No. 90-495. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Radloff L: The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population.Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977,1: 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shrout PE, Yager TJ: Reliability and validity of screening scales: Effect of reducing scale length.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1989,42: 69–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Nardo PA, O’Brien GT, Barlow DH, Waddell MT, Blanchard EB: Reliability of DSM-III anxiety disorder categories using a new structured interview.Archives of General Psychiatry. 1983,40: 1070–1074.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ettinger WH, Wahl PW, Kuller LH, et al.: Liporotein lipids in older people: Results from the Cardiovascular Health Study.Circulation. 1992,86: 858–869.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Teng EL, Chui HC: The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination.Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1987,48: 314–318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Teng EL, Chui HC, Gong A: Comparisons between the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and its modified version—The 3MS test. InPsychogeriatrics: Biomedical and Social Advances. Tokyo, Japan: Excerpta Medica, 1990, 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wechsler D:Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Masur DM, Sliwinski M, Lipton RB, Blau AD, Crystal HA: Neuropsychological prediction of dementia and the absence of dementia in healthy elderly persons,Neurology, 1994,44: 1427–1432.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alder NE, Boyce T, Chesney MS, et al.: Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.American Psychologist. 1994.49: 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH46015, MH52247), contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC85079-85086), and grants from the National Institute on Aging (AG09292, AG13305).

About this article

Cite this article

Schulz, R., Newsom, J., Mittelmark, M. et al. Health effects of caregiving: The caregiver health effects study: An ancillary study of the cardiovascular health study. ann. behav. med. 19, 110–116 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02883327

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02883327

Keywords

Navigation