Skip to main content
Log in

Mismatch negativity of ERP in cross-modal attention

  • Published:
Science in China Series C: Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Event-related potentials were measured in 12 healthy youth subjects aged 19–22 using the paradigm “cross-modal and delayed response” which is able to improve unattended purity and to avoid the effect of task target on the deviant components of ERP. The experiment included two conditions: (i) Attend visual modality, ignore auditory modality; (ii) attend auditory modality, ignore visual modality. The stimuli under the two conditions were the same. The difference wave was obtained by subtracting ERPs of the standard stimuli from that of the deviant stimuli. The present results showed that mismatch negativity (MMN), N2b and P3 components can be produced in the auditory and visual modalities under attention condition. However, only MMN was observed in the two modalities under inattention condition. Auditory and visual MMN have some features in common: their largest MMN wave peaks were distributed respectively over their primary sensory projection areas of the scalp under attention condition, but over frontc-central scalp under inattention condition. There was no significant difference between the amplitudes of visual and auditory MMN. Their amplitudes and the scalp distribution were unaffected by attention, thus suggesting that MMN amplitude is an important index reflecting automatic processing in the brain. However, the latency of the auditory and visual MMN were affected by attention, showing that MMN not only reflects automatic processing but also probably relates to control processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Naatanen, R.,Attention and Brain Function, New Jersey: Hillsdale, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woldorff, M, G.. Hackley, S, A., Hillyard, S, A., The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones,Psychophysiology, 1991, 28: 30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Tiitinen, H.et al., Attention and mismatch negativity,Psychophysiology, 1993, 23: 436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciesielski, K, T., Knight, J. E., Prince, R. J.et al., Event-related potentials in cross-modal divided attention in autism,Neuropsychologia, 1995, 33: 225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cammann, R., Is there a mismatch negativity in the visual modality?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1990, 13: 234.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wei, J. H., The paradigm of simultaneous-like stimuli and delayed response, and its role in ERP research,J. of Developments in Psychology (in Chinese), 1995, 3(4): 28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, C. M., Fu, G. L., The recognition of Chinese characters and words under divided visual-field presentation, inLinguistics, Psychology and the Chinese Language (eds. Kao, H. S. R., Hoosain, R.), Hong Kong: Hong Kong University press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Polich, J., Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies,Psychophysiology, 1996, 33: 334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Woods, D. L., Alho, K., Algazi, A., Intermodal selective attention I—Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli,Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 82: 341.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alho, K., Woods, D. L., Algazi, A., Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by eventrelated potentials,Psychophysiology, 1994, 31: 469.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Czigler, I., Csibra, G., Event-related potentials in a visual discrimination task,Psychophysiology, 1990, 27: 669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hackley, S. A., Woldorff, M. G., Hillyard, S. A., Cross-modal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstern, and cerebral evoked potentials,Psychophysiology, 1990, 27: 195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hohnsbein, J., Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J.et al., Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components,Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 78: 438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Winkler, I., Paavilainen, P., Näätänen, R., Can echoic memory store two traces simultaneously? A study of event-related brain potentials,Psychophysiology, 1992, 29: 337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Wei, J. Mismatch negativity of ERP in cross-modal attention. Sci. China Ser. C.-Life Sci. 40, 604–612 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02882690

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02882690

Keywords

Navigation