Abstract
Taking as its starting point the commonly held claim about the obscurity of the concept of sovereignty, the article first identifies a fundamental paradox between the classical Westphalian notion of state sovereignty and human rights. In the rhetoric of international politics, attempts to establish the responsibility of states to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms within their jurisdictions are often countered with claims referring to the “sovereign equality” of all states and the subsequent principle of non-intervention. The article suggests that in a more contemporary understanding of sovereignty the responsibility of a state to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms is seen as a constituent ingredient of the state itself. The chapter continues to elaborate how this change has come about. The classical notion of sovereignty is illustrated through a reading of Bodin’s Six Books of the Commonwealth (1576). In Bodin’s world, sovereignty is a constitutive element of the state, and the possibility of a multitude of sovereign entities in a global world logically denying the possibility of any “supra-national” normative framework is still a minor consideration. This possibility is only worked out with the emergence of international law. In both classics such as Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations (1758) and more contemporary treatises such as Lassa Oppenheim’s International Law (1905), state sovereignty has become conditional to recognition by other sovereign states and a subsequent membership in the “family of nations.” The conditional membership in the “family of nations” involves a contradiction: a sovereign state must act in a “dignified” manner, it must use its sovereignty with “restraint” by respecting the human rights and fundamental freedoms of its citizens, i.e., it must employ its sovereignty in a non-sovereign way. This restriction of sovereignty, addressed as “ethical sovereignty,” becomes a constitutive element in a post-Westphalian state and a central ingredient in the contemporary doctrine of humanitarian intervention. The article further criticizes the various uses (and abuses) of “ethical sovereignty” in the regulation of “failing” and “rogue” states and concludes by identifying its general political dangers. Finally, with reference to Jacques Derrida’s Rogues (2003), the article suggests a more radical reappraisal of the concept of sovereignty.
It is a fact that sovereignty is a term used without any well-recognised meaning except that of supreme authority. Under these circumstances those who do not want to interfere in a mere scholastic controversy must cling to the facts of life and the practical, though abnormal and illogical, condition of affairs.1
—Lassa Oppenheim
But to invoke the concept of national sovereignty as in itself a decisional factor is to fall back on a word which has an emotive quality lacking meaningful specific content. It is to substitute pride for reason.2
—Eli Lauterpacht
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annan, Kofi. “Two concepts of sovereignty,”The Economist, 18 September 1999. p. 82.
Bentham, Jeremy.An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (London: T. Payne & Son, 1789).
Bodin, Jean.Les six livres de la République de J. Bodin Angeuin. A Monseigneur du Faur seigneur de Pibrac, Conseiller du Roy en son privé Conseil (Lyon: Jean de Tournes, 1579).
Cohn-Bendit, Daniel and Zaki Laïdi. “La souveraineté ethique,”Libération, 6 juin 1999.
Derrida, Jacques.Voyous. Deux essais sur la raison (Paris: Galilée, 2003).
Derrida, Jacques and Jürgen Habermas. “Europe — plaidoyer pour une politique extérieure commune,”Libération, 31 mai 2003.
Fauchille, Paul.Traité de droit international public. Tome ler. Première partie. Paix (Paris: Rousseau & Cie, 1923).
Fontaine, Jean de la.Fables I. (Euvres complètes. Tome premier (Paris: Garnier Frères, 1872).
Gross, Leo. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948,”American Journal of International Law, Vol. 42, Nr. 1, 1948), p. 20–41.
Grotius, Hugo.Hugonis Grotii de ivre belli ac pacis libris tres in quibus ius naturae & gentium, item iuris publici praecipua explicantur (Parisiis: apud Nicolaum Buon, 1625).
Grotius, Hugo. “De la liberté des meres,”Annales maritimes et coloniales. 30e année. 3e série (Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1845), p. 654–717.
Hobbes, Thomas.Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill (New York/London: Norton, 1997).
Kelsen, Hans. “The Draft Declaration on Rights and Duties of States,”American Journal of International Law, Vol. 44, Nr. 2, 1950. p. 276–249.
Kelsen, Hans.Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre. 2. Neudruck der 2. Auflage, Tübingen 1928 (Aalen: Scientia, 1981).
Klabbers, Jan. “Clinching the Concept of Sovereignty: Wimbledon Redux,”Austrian Review of International and European Law, Vol. 3, Nr. 3, 1998, 345–367.
Lauterpacht, Eli. “Sovereignty — myth or reality?”International Affairs, Vol. 73, Nr. 1, 1997, p. 137–150.
Leeman, Nicholas. “The Next World Order,”New Yorker, 1 April 2002.
Liszt, Franz von.Das Völkerrecht systematisch dargestellt. 11., umgearbeitete Auflage (Berlin: Julius Springer, 1918).
Loewenstein, Karl. “Sovereignty and International Co-operation,”American Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, Nr. 2, 1954, p. 222–244.
Nancy, Jean-Luc.L’expérience de la liberté (Paris: Galilée, 1988).
Oppenheim, Lassa.International Law. A Treatise. Vol I. Peace (London/New York/Bombay: Longmans, Green & Co., 1905).
Pradier-Fodéré, Paul.Traité de droit international public européen et américain, suivant les progrès de la science et de la pratique contemporaines. Tome premiere (Paris: A. Durand et Pedone-Lauriel, 1885).
Pufendorf, Samuel von.Of the Laws of Nature and Nations: Eight Books (Oxford: L. Lichfield, 1703).
Pufendorf, Samuel von.Les devoirs de l’homme et du citoyen tels qu’ils lui sont prescrits par la loi naturelle. Tome deuxième. Trad. du latin par Jean Barbeyrac (Londres: J. Nourse, 1741).
Schmitt, Carl. “Staatliche Souveränität und freies Meer. Über den Gegensatz von Land und See im Völkerrecht der Neuzeit,” inStaat, Grossraum, Nomos. Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916–1969. Herausgegeben, mit einem Vorwort und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Günter Maschke (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1995), p. 401–430.
Selden, John.Mare clausum seu de Dominio maris. Libri duo (Londinense: Will. Stanesbeii, 1636).
The Responsibility to Protect. Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).
Vattel, Emmerich de.Le droit des gens ou Principes de la loi naturelle appliqués à la conduite et aux affaires des nations et des souverains. Tome I (Londres: [s.n.], 1758).
Wolff, Christian.Institutiones juris naturae et gentiumn in quibus ex ipsa hominis natura continuo nexu omnes obligationes et jura omnia deducuntur (Venetiis: Nicolaum Pezzana, 1761).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minkkinen, P. The ethos of sovereignty: A critical appraisal. Hum Rights Rev 8, 33–51 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02881665
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02881665