Abstract
Human rights and sovereignty are generally construed as disputatious, if not entirely incompatible; the liability of the former constrains the license of the latter. This article challenges the certitude of that notion and argues that democratic, isocratic, and humanistic elements, or what may be thought of as precursors of human rights, are actually embedded in early theories of sovereignty, including what I call Bodin’s hierarchical, Althusius’ confederative, Hobbes’ singular, and Hegel’s progressive/constitutional sovereignty. Despite the differences in governmental structure to which each attaches sovereignty, each disassociates sovereignty from its agents (who does the work of supreme authority) and aligns it to its end (the good of citizens). From them I derive eight theses to ground a democratic, human rights friendly conception of sovereignty, which aids in bridging the divide between human rights advocacy and sovereign defenders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Althusius, Johannes. 1964.The Politics of Johannes Althusius: An Abridged Translation of the Third Edition [1614] of Politica Methodice Digesta, Atque Exemplis Sacris et Profanis Illustrata. trans. and intro. Frederick Carney. Boston: Beacon Press.
Barkin, J. Samuel. 1998. “The Evolution and the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms.”Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27(2): 229–252.
Biersteker, Thomas and Cynthia Weber (eds). 1996. “The Social Construction of State Sovereignty.” in T. Biersteker and C. Weber (eds.)State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–21.
Bodin, Jean. [1576] 1955.Six Books of the Commonwealth. ed. and trans. M.J. Tooley. New York: MacMillan.
_____ 1992.On Sovereignty: Four Chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth. ed. and trans. Julian Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, Hedley. [1977] 1995.The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
Camilleri, Joseph. 1990. “Rethinking Sovereignty in a Shrinking, Fragmented World.” inContending Sovereignties: Redefining Political Community. R.B.J. Walker and Saul Mendlovitz (eds.). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers: 13–44.
Chayes, Abram and Antonia Handler Chayes. 1995.The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Creppell, Ingrid. 2003.Toleration and Identity: Foundations in Early Modern Thought. New York: Routledge.
Cronin, Bruce. 1999.Community under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Columbia.
Donnelly, Jack. 2004. “State Sovereignty and Human Rights.”Human Rights & Human Welfare. www.du.edu/gsis/hrhw/working/2004/21-donnelly-2204.pdf.
Engster, Daniel. 2001.Divine Sovereignty: The Origins of Modern State Power. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
Fox, Gregory. 1997. “New Approaches to International Human Rights: The Sovereign State Revisited.” inState Sovereignty: Change and Persistence in International Relations. Sohail H. Hashmi (ed.). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press: 105–130.
Garner, James. 1925. “Limitations on National Sovereignty in International Relations.”The American Political Science Review 19(1): 709–744.
Gilbert, Alan. 1999.Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy? Great-Power Realism, Democratic Peace, and Democratic Internationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gross, Leo. 1948. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948,”The American Journal of International Law 42(1): 20–41.
Hampton, Jean. 1994. “Democracy and the Rule of Law.” inNOMOS XXXVI: The Rule of Law. ed. Ian Shapiro. New York: New York University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. [1821] 1952.The Philosophy of Right. trans. T.M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____ 1964. “The English Reform Bill.” inHegel’s Political Writings. trans. T.M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
_____ [1830] 1971.Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind: Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences. trans. William Wallace, foreword J.N. Findlay. Oxford: Clarendon.
Held, David. 1995.Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hinsley, F.N. 1986.Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1990.Behemoth or The Long Parliament. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
_____. 1994.Leviathan. ed. Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). 2001.The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Keohane, Robert. 1995. “Hobbes’s Dilemma and Institutional Change in World Politics: Sovereignty in International Society.” inWhose World Order? Uneven Globalization and the End of the Cold War. Hans-Henrik Holm and Georg Sorensen (eds.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
King, Preston. 1974.The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Krasner, Stephen. 1999.Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Linklater, Andrew. 1998.The Transformation of Political Community. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Loewenstein, Karl. 1954. “Sovereignty and International Co-operation.”The American Journal of International Law 48(2): 222–244.
Maine, Sir Henry. [1887] 1915.International Law: A Series of Lectures Delivered before the University of Cambridge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Onuf, Nicholas. 1998.The Republican Legacy in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Painter, Joe. 2002. “Multi-level Citizenship, Identity and Regions in Contemporary Europe.” inTransnational Democracy: Political Spaces and Border Crossings. James Anderson (ed.). New York: Routledge: 93–110.
Philpott, Daniel. 2001.Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rawls, John. 1999.The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999.The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schmidt, Brian. 1998.The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Shklar, Judith. 1984.Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stewart, Jon (ed). 1996.The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Walker, R.B.J. 1993.Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, Cynthia. 1995.Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, Max. 1946. “Politics as a Vocation.” inFrom Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press: 77–128.
Weil, Eric. 1998.Hegel and the State. trans. Mark Cohen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Weinert, Matthew. 2004. “Negotiating Toleration: Engagement, Enforcement, and the Politics of Recognition.”Human Rights & Human Welfare 4: 101–113.
Williams, Michael. 1996. “Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration.”International Organization 50(1996): 213–236.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinert, M.S. Bridging the human rights—Sovereignty divide: Theoretical foundations of a democratic sovereignty. Hum Rights Rev 8, 5–32 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02881664
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02881664