Interpretations of ambiguous social situations and cardiovascular responses in adolescents


Background: Previous research has documented effects of ambiguous outcome social situations on individual differences in cardiovascular reactivity in laboratory contexts.Purpose: This study tested whether interpretations of ambiguous social situations are associated with daily life cardiovascular responses using ambulatory approaches.Methods: There were 206 high school adolescents assessed on interpretations of ambiguous social situations in the laboratory who then completed ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) for 2 days.Results: Adolescents who perceived threat during ambiguous situations exhibited higher systolicBP when talking to others compared to occasions of not talking with anyone, whereas the opposite was true for those with low threat perception. For high-threat adolescents, higher systolicBP was found when interacting with friends, whereas for low threat adolescents, lower systolicBP was found when interacting with parents. Greater threat interpretations were also associated with elevatedHR at night.Conclusions: Understanding how adolescents perceive social interactions may help in gauging their daily cardiovascular responses.


  1. (1).
    Berkman LF, Syme SL: Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1979,109:186-04.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Rabin BS, Gwaltney JM Jr.: Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997,277:1940-944.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Kamarck TW, Manuck SB, Jennings JR: Social support reduces cardiovascular reactivity to psychological challenge -A laboratory model.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1990,52:42-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Hawkley LC, Burleson MH, Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT: Loneliness in everyday life: Cardiovascular activity, psychosocial context, and health behaviors.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003,85:105-20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Lazarus RS, Folkman S:Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Smith CA, Lazarus RS: Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions.Cognition and Emotion. 1993,7:233-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Roseman IJ: Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions.Cognition and Emotion. 1991,5:161-00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Frijda NH: The place of appraisal in emotion.Cognition and Emotion. 1993,7:357-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Frijda NH, Kuipers P, ter Schure E: Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989,57:212-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Parkinson B: Untangling the appraisal-emotion connection.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1997,1:62-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Schneider TR: The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2004,40:795-04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Dickerson SS, Kemeny ME: Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research.Psychological Bulletin. 2004,130:355-91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Krantz DS, Manuck SB: Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: A review and methodological critique.Psychological Bulletin. 1984,96:435-64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Manuck SB: Cardiovascular reactivity in cardiovascular disease: “Once more unto the breach.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,1:4-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Segerstrom SC, Miller GE: Psychological stress and the human immune system: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry.Psychological Bulletin. 2004,130:601-30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Herbert TB, Cohen S: Stress and immunity in humans: A meta-analytic review.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1993,55:364-79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Smith CA: Dimensions of appraisal and physiological response in emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989,56:339-53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kibler J, Ernst JM: Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997,73:63-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey RM, Leitten CL: Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993,65:248-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Maier KJ, Waldstein SR, Synowski SJ: Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003,26:32-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Williams SC, Lochman JE, Phillips NC, Barry TD: Aggressive and nonaggressive boys-physiological and cognitive processes in response to peer provocations.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2003,32:568-76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Clark R: Perceptions of interethnic group racism predict increased vascular reactivity to a laboratory challenge in college women.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2000,22:214-22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Clark R: Perceived racism and vascular reactivity in Black college women: Moderating effects of seeking social support.Health Psychology. 2006,25:20-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Merritt MM, Bennett GG, Williams RB, Edwards CL, Sollers JJ: Perceived racism and cardiovascular reactivity and recovery to personally relevant stress.Health Psychology. 2006,25:364-69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Lepore SJ, Revenson TA, Weinberger SL, et al.: Effects of social stressors on cardiovascular reactivity in Black and White women.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006,31:120-27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Brondolo E, Rieppi R, Erickson SA, et al.: Hostility, interpersonal interactions, and ambulatory blood pressure.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003,65:1003-011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Downey G, Mougios V, Ayduk O, London BE, Shoda Y: Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues.Psychological Science. 2004,15:668-73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Chen E, Matthews KA: Cognitive appraisal biases: An approach to understanding the relation between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular reactivity in children.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2001,23:101-11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Chen E, Langer DA, Raphaelson YE, Matthews KA: Socioeconomic status and health in adolescents: The role of stress interpretations.Child Development. 2004,75:1039-052.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Smith TW: Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis.Health Psychology. 1992,11:139-50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Chen E, Matthews KA: Development of the Cognitive Appraisal and Understanding of Social Events (CAUSE) Videos.Health Psychology. 2003,22:106-10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA, Warren K, Pickering TG: A longitudinal study of job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: Results from a three-year follow-up.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1998,60:697-06.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Linden W, Chambers L, Maurice J, Lenz JW: Sex differences in social support, self-deception, hostility, and ambulatory cardiovascular activity.Health Psychology. 1993,12:376-80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Goldstein IB, Shapiro D, Chicz-DeMet A, Guthrie D: Ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and neuroendocrine responses in women nurses during work and off work days.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1999,61:387-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Steptoe A: Stress, social support and cardiovascular activity over the working day.International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2000,37:299-08.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Brondolo E, Karlin W, Alexander K, Bobrow A, Schwartz J: Workday communication and ambulatory blood pressure: Implications for the reactivity hypothesis.Psychophysiology. 1999,36:86-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Karlin WA, Brondolo E, Schwartz J: Workplace social support and ambulatory cardiovascular activity in New York City traffic agents.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003,65:167-76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Wilson DK, Kliewer W, Plybon L, et al.: Violence exposure and ambulatory blood pressure in African-American adolescents.International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health. 1998,4:223-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. (39).
    Rau R, Georgiades A, Fredrikson M, Lemne C, de Faire U: Psychosocial work characteristics and perceived control in relation to cardiovascular rewind at night.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2001,6:171-81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Wilson DK, Kliewer W, Teasley N, Plybon L, Sica DA: Violence exposure, catecholamine excretion, and blood pressure nondipping status in African American male versus female adolescents.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2002,64:906-15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Theorell T, Defaire U, Johnson J, et al.: Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure profiles.Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health. 1991,17:380-85.Google Scholar
  42. (42).
    Cohen S, Kessler RC, Underwood LG:Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  43. (43).
    Matthews KA, Salomon K, Kenyon K, Zhou F: Unfair treatment, discrimination, and ambulatory blood pressure in black and white adolescents.Health Psychology. 2005,24:258-65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Barefoot JC, Dodge KA, Peterson BL, Dahlstrom WG, Williams RB: The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survival.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1989,51:46-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Woodall KL, Matthews KA: Changes in and stability of hostile characteristics: Results from a 4-year longitudinal study of children.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993,64:491-99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. (46).
    Masten AS, Neemann J, Andenas S: Life events and adjustment in adolescents: The significance of event independence, desirability, and chronicity.Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1994,4:71-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. (47).
    Garmezy N, Tellegen A: Studies of stress-resistant children: Methods, variables and preliminary findings. In Morrison F, Lord C, Keating D (eds),Advances in Applied Developmental Psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1984, 231-87.Google Scholar
  48. (48).
    Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Boldrini F, Zampi I, Porcellati C: Variability between current definitions of normal ambulatory blood pressure: Implications in the assessment of white coat hypertension.Hypertension. 1992,20:555-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. (49).
    Cohen J:Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.Google Scholar
  50. (50).
    Gump BB, Matthews KA: Vigilance and cardiovascular reactivity to subsequent stressors in men: A preliminary study.Health Psychology. 1998,17:93-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. (51).
    Ewart CK, Jorgensen RS: Agonistic interpersonal striving: Social-cognitive mechanism of cardiovascular risk in youth?Health Psychology. 2004,23:75-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. (52).
    Lepore SJ, Allen KA, Evans GW: Social support lowers cardiovascular reactivity to an acute stressor.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1993,55:518-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. (53).
    Steffen PR, McNeilly M, Anderson N, Sherwood A: Effects of perceived racism and anger inhibition on ambulatory blood pressure in African Americans.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003,65:746-50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. (54).
    Feldman PJ, Cohen S, Lepore SJ, et al.: Negative emotions and acute physiological responses to stress.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:216-22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. (55).
    Unden AL, Orthgomer K, Elofsson S: Cardiovascular effects of social support in the work place: 24-hour ECG monitoring of men and women.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1991,53:50-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. (56).
    Gerin W, Pickering TG: Association between delayed recovery of blood pressure after acute mental stress and parental history of hypertension.Journal of Hypertension. 1995,13:603-10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. (57).
    Schuler JLH, O’Brien WH: Cardiovascular recovery from stress and hypertension risk factors: A meta-analytic review.Psychophysiology. 1997,34:649-59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. (58).
    Parker FC, Croft JB, Cresanta JL, et al.: The association between cardiovascular response tasks and future blood pressure levels in children: Bogalusa Heart Study.American Heart Journal. 1987,113:1174-179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. (59).
    Matthews KA, Woodall KL, Allen MT: Cardiovascular reactivity to stress predicts future blood pressure status.Hypertension. 1993,22:479-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. (60).
    Matthews KA, Salomon K, Brady SS, Allen MT: Cardiovascular reactivity to stress predicts future blood pressure in adolescence.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003,65:410-15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. (61).
    Newman JD, McGarvey ST, Steele MS: Longitudinal association of cardiovascular reactivity and blood pressure in Samoan adolescents.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1999,61:243-49.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaBritish ColumbiaCanada
  2. 2.University of PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations