Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of perceived hypertension status on anxiety and the white coat effect

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: The white coat effect can lead to overdiagnosis of hypertension and unnecessary pharmacologic treatment. Mechanisms underlying the white coat effect remain poorly understood but are critical to improving the accuracy of clinic blood pressure measurement.Purpose: This study investigated whether perceived hypertension status was associated with state anxiety levels during a clinic visit and the magnitude of the white coat effect, independent of true blood pressure status.Methods: This observational study included 214 normotensive and mildly hypertensive participants who were 18 to 80 years old, had no cardiac history, and were willing to discontinue antihypertensive medications for 8 weeks. Participants underwent 36 hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and physician blood pressure measurement. Outcome measures were state anxiety reported during the clinic visit and the white coat effect.Results: An analysis of covariance indicated that participants who perceived themselves as hypertensive reported greater state anxiety (p<.001) and showed larger white coat effects (ps<.01) compared with those who perceived themselves as normotensive. True hypertension status based on ambulatory blood pressure was not related to either outcome. Anxiety accounted for approximately 19% of the association between perceived hypertension status and the white coat effect.Conclusions: These findings suggest that the perception of being hypertensive is associated with greater anxiety during clinic blood pressure measurement and a larger white coat effect, independent of the true blood pressure level. Anxiety appears to be a mechanism by which perceived hypertension status contributes to the white coat effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Brien EO, Asmar R, Beilin L, et al.: European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement.Journal of Hypertension. 2003,21:821-48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al.: Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 1: Blood pressure measurement in humans.Hypertension. 2005,45:142-61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pickering T: Recommendations for the use of home (self) and ambulatory blood presure monitoring. American Society of Hypertension Ad Hoc Panel.American Journal of Hypertension. 1996,9:1-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen TW, Jeppesen J, Rasmussen S, Ibsen H, Torp-Pedersen C: Ambulatory blood pressure and mortality: A population-based study.Hypertension. 2005,45:499-04.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mancia G, Zanchetti A: Editors-corner: White-coat hypertension: Misnomers, misconceptions and misunderstandings. What should we do next?Journal of Hypertension. 1996,14:1049-052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiner H:Perturbing the Organism: The Biology of Stressful Experience. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herd JA: Cardiovascular response to stress.Physiological Reviews. 1991,71:305-30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU:Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Donner-Banzhoff N, Chan Y, Szalai JP, Hilditch JR: Is the “clinic-home blood pressure difference-associated with psychological distress? A primary care-based study.Journal of Hypertension. 1997,15:585-90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Siegel WC, Blumenthal JA, Divine GW: Physiological, psychological, and behavioral factors and white coat hypertension.Hypertension. 1990,16:140-46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jhalani J, Goyal T, Clemow L, et al.: Anxiety and outcome expectations predict the white coat effect.Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2005,10:317-19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeter CR, Bush JP, Porter JH: Situational anxiety and blood pressure lability in the physician’s office.Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. 1988,10:169-85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rostrup M, Ekeberg O: Awareness of high blood pressure influences on psychological and sympathetic responses.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1992,36:117-23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rostrup M, Mundal HH, Westheim A, Eide I: awareness of high blood pressure increases arterial plasma catecholamines, platelet noradrenaline and adrenergic responses to mental stress.Journal of Hypertension. 1991,19:159-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Taylor DW, Gibson ES, Johnson AL: Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients.New England Journal of Medicine. 1978,299:741-44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mena-Martin FJ, Martin-Escudero JC, Simal-Blanco F, et al.: Health-related quality of life of subjects with known and unknown hypertension: results from the population-based Hortega study.Journal of Hypertension. 2003,21:1283-289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zonderman AB, Leu VL, Costa PT: Effects of age, hypertension history, and neuroticism on health perceptions.Experimental Gerontology. 1986,21:449-58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soghikian K, Fallick-Hunkeler EM, Ury HK, Fisher AA: The effect of high blood pressure awareness and treatment on emotional well-being.Clinical and Investigative Medicine. 1981,4:191-96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bloom JR, Monterossa S: Hypertension labeling and sense of well-being.American Journal of Public Health. 1981,71:1228-232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart JC, France CR, Sheffield D: Hypertension awareness and pain reports: Data from the NHANES III.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003,26:8-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, et al.: The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices.Journal of Hypertension. 1993,11(Suppl. 2):S43-S62.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gerin W, Ogedegbe G, Schwartz JE, et al.: Assessment of the white coat effect.Journal of Hypertension. 2006,24:67-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986,51:1173-182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N: The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report.Psychological Medicine. 1983,13:595-05.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spielberger CD:Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor JA: A personality scale of manifest anxiety.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1953,48:285-90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V: A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.Psychological Methods. 2002,7:83-04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baumann LJ, Cameron LD, Zimmerman RS, Leventhal H: Illness representations and matching labels with symptoms.Health Psychology. 1989,8:449-69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Melamed S, Froom P, Green MS: Hypertension and sickness absence: The role of perceived symptoms.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1997,20:473-87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leventhal H, Safer MA, Panagis DM: The impact of communications on the self-regulation of health beliefs, decisions, and behavior.Health Education Quarterly. 1983,10:3-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gerend MA, Aiken LS, West SG, Erchull MJ: Beyond medical risk: investigating psychological factors underlying women’s perceptions of susceptibility to breast cancer, heart disease, and osteoporosis.Health Psychology. 2004,23:247-58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Frijling BD, Lobo DM, Keus IM, et al.: Perception of cardiovascular risk among patients with hypertension or diabetes.Patient Education & Counseling. 2004,52:47-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al.: The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 Report.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003,289:2560-572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Greenlund KJ, Croft JB, Mensah GA: Prevalence of heart disease and stroke risk factors in persons with prehypertension in the United States, 1999-000.Archives of Internal Medicine. 2004,164:2113-118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Kannel WB, Levy D: Assessment of frequency of progression to hypertension in non-hypertensive participants in the Framingham Heart Study: A cohort study.Lancet. 2001,358:1682-686.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Wang QJ: The prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension among US adults according to the new Joint National Committee Guidelines.Archives of Internal Medicine. 2004,164:2126-134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaw C, Abrams K, Marteau TM: Psychological impact of predicting individuals-risks of illness: A systematic review.Social Science & Medicine. 1999,49:1571-598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, et al.: Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991,114:657-61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Barton MB, Moore S, Polk S, et al.: Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: Clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001,16:150-56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Emmelin M, Weinehall L, Stegmayr B, et al.: Self-rated ill-health strengthens the effect of biomedical risk factors in predicting stroke, especially for men: An incident case referent study.Journal of Hypertension. 2003,21:887-96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Weinehall L, Johnson O, Jansson JH, et al.: Perceived health modifies the effect of biomedical risk factors in the prediction of acute myocardial infarction: An incident case-control study from northern Sweden.Journal of Internal Medicine. 1998,243:99-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Idler EL, Benyamini Y: Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1997,38:21-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Benyamini Y, Idler EL: Community studies reporting association between self-rated health and mortality - Additional studies, 1995-998.Research on Aging. 1999,21:392-01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bull SA, Hu XH, Hunkeler EM, et al.: Discontinuation of use and switching of antidepressants: Influence of patientphysician communication.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002,288:1403-409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stewart MA: Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: A review.Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1995,15:1423-433.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanya M. Spruill Ph.D..

Additional information

Preparation of this article was supported in part by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Grants HL47540 and HL76857, T. G. Pickering, Principal Investigator. The sponsors had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of this article; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

About this article

Cite this article

Spruill, T.M., Pickering, T.G., Schwartz, J.E. et al. The impact of perceived hypertension status on anxiety and the white coat effect. ann. behav. med. 34, 1–9 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879915

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879915

Keywords

Navigation