Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 251–261 | Cite as

Guide to health: Nutrition and physical activity outcomes of a group-randomized trial of an internet-based intervention in churches

  • Richard A. Winett
  • Eileen S. Anderson
  • Janet R. Wojcik
  • Sheila G. Winett
  • Todd Bowden
Article

Abstract

Background: Theory-based interventions accessible to large groups of people are needed to induce favorable shifts in health behaviors and body weight.Purpose: The aim was to assess nutrition; physical activity; and, secondarily, body weight in the tailored, social cognitive Guide to Health (GTH) Internet intervention delivered in churches.Methods: Participants (N=1,071; 33% male, 23% African American, 57% with body mass index ≥25, 60% sedentary, Mdn age=53 years) within 14 Baptist or United Methodist churches were randomized to the GTH intervention only (GTH-Only; 5 churches), with church-based supports (GTH-Plus; 5 churches), or to a waitlist (control; 4 churches). Verified pedometer step counts, measured body weight, fat, fiber, and fruit and vegetable (F&V) servings from food frequency and supermarket receipts were collected at pretest, posttest (7 months after pretest), and follow-up (16 months after pretest).Results: Participants in GTH-Only increased F&V at post (∼1.50 servings) compared to control (∼0.50 servings; p=.005) and at follow-up (∼1.20 vs. ∼0.50 servings; p=.038) and increased fiber at post (∼3.00 g) compared to control (∼1.5 g; p=.006) and follow-up (∼3.00 g vs. ∼2.00 g; p=.040). GTH-Plus participants compared to control increased steps at post (∼1,500 steps/day vs. ∼400 steps/day; p=.050) and follow-up (∼1,000 steps/day vs. ∼−50 steps/day; p=.010), increased F&V at post (∼1.5 servings; p=.007) and follow-up (∼1.3 servings; p=.014), increased fiber at post (∼3.00 g; p=.013), and follow-up (∼3.00; p=.050) and decreased weight at post (∼−0.30 kg vs. ∼+0.60 kg; p=.030).Conclusions: Compared to control, both GTH treatments improved nutrition at posttest, but church supports improved physical activity and nutrition at posttest and follow-up, suggesting environmental supports may improve Internet-based interventions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Roberts CK, Barnard RJ: Effects of exercise and diet on chronic disease.Journal of Applied Physiology. 2005,98:3–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Reeves MJ, Rafferty AP: Healthy lifestyle characteristics among adults in the United States, 2000.Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005,165:854–857.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Finkelstein EA, Ruhm CJ, Kosa KM: Economic causes and consequences of obesity.Annual Review of Public Health. 2005,26:239–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Block G: Food contributing to energy intake in the US: Data from NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2000.Journal of Food Consumption and Analysis. 2004,17:439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Katz DL: Competing dietary claims for weight loss.Annual Review of Public Health. 2005,26:61–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Jeffery RW, Drewnowski A, Epstein LH, et al.: Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status.Health Psychology. 2000,19:5–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Jeffery RW: How can behavior theory be made more useful for intervention research?International Journal of Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2004,1:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Perri MG, Corisca JA: Improving the maintenance of weight lost in behavioral treatment of obesity. In Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ (eds),Handbook of Obesity Treatment. New York: Guilford, 2002, 357–375.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, et al.: Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999,281:327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Writing Group for the Activity Counseling Trial Research Group: Effects of physical activity counseling in primary care: The activity counseling trial.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001,286:677–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Duncan GE, Anton SD, Sydeman SJ, et al.: Prescribing exercise at varied levels of intensity and frequency.Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005,165:2362–2369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Winett RA, Tate DT, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett SG: Weight gain prevention: A theoretically-based, long-term Internet approach.Preventive Medicine. 2005,41:629–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Hill JO, Sallis JF, Peters JC: Economic analysis of eating and physical activity: A next step for research and policy changes.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004,27:111–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Reid E: Can the physical environment determine physical activity levels?Exercise and Sports Science Review. 2005,33:69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, et al.: An ecological approach to creating living environments.Annual Review of Public Health. 2006,27:297–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Reger B, Cooper L, Booth-Butterfield S, et al.: Wheeling walks: A community campaign using paid media to encourage walking among sedentary older adults.Preventive Medicine. 2002,35:285–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Bandura A:Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Bandura A: Health promotion by social cognitive means.Health Education and Behavior. 2004,31:143–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Eng E, Hatch J, Callan A: Institutionalizing social support through the church and into the community.Health Education Quarterly. 1985,12:81–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Hatch J, Derthick S: Empowering Black churches for health promotion.Health Values. 199,16:3–11.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Lasater TM, Carleton RS, Wells BL: Religious organizations and large-scale health-related lifestyle change programs.Journal of Health Education. 1991,22:233–239.Google Scholar
  23. (23).
    Winett RA, Anderson ES, Whiteley JA, et al.: Church-based health behavior programs: using social cognitive theory to formulate interventions for at-risk populations.Applied and Preventive Psychology. 1999,8:124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Campbell MK, Demark-Wahnefried W, Symons M, et al.: Improving fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention in communities: The Black Churches United for Better Health Project.American Journal of Public Health. 1999,89:1390–1396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Resnicow K, Jackson A, Wang T, et al.: A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through Black churches: Results of the Eat for Life Trial.American Journal of Public Health. 2001,91:1686–1693.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Campbell MK, James A, Hudson MA, et al.: Improving multiple behaviors for colorectal cancer prevention among African American church members.Health Psychology. 2004,23:492–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Resnicow K, Jackson A, Bissett D: Results of the healthy body, healthy spirit trial.Health Psychology. 2005,24:339–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Resnicow K, Campbell MK, Carr C, et al.: Body and soul: A dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004,27:97–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Rose G:The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  30. (30).
    Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR, Winett SG, Bowden T: A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: Direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancies among food shoppers.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2001,23:88–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Walberg-Rankin J, Anderson ES, Winett RA: Food purchase patterns at the grocery store and their relationship to family characteristics.Journal of Nutrition Education. 1998,30:81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Anderson ES, Winett RA, Bickley PG, et al.: The effects of a multimedia system in supermarkets to alter shoppers’ food purchases.Journal of Health Psychology. 1997,2:209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett RA, Williams DA: Social cognitive determinants of physical activity: The influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome-expectations, and self-regulation.Health Psychology. 2006,25:510–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    American College of Sports Medicine:ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (7th Ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2005.Google Scholar
  35. (35).
    Meyers J, Do D, Herbert WG, Ribisl P, Froelicher VF: A nonogram to predict exercise capacity from a specific activity questionnaire and clinical data.American Journal of Cardiology. 1999,73:591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG: CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomized trials.British Medical Journal. 2004,328:702–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Kazdin AE:Behavior Modification in Applied Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2001.Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ: Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q).Canadian Journal of Sport Science. 1992,17:338–345.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Berkeley Nutrition Services:Block 98 Food Frequency Questionnaire. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Nutrition Services, 1998.Google Scholar
  40. (40).
    Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR: Social cognitive determinants of nutrition behavior among supermarket shoppers: A structural equation analysis.Health Psychology. 2000,19:479–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Murray DM:Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  42. (42).
    Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL: Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: A review of recent methodological developments.American Journal of Public Health. 2004,94:423–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Houck PA, Mazumdar S, Koru-Sengul T, et al.: Estimating treatment effects from longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values: Comparative analyses using different methods.Psychiatric Research. 2004,129:209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Hedges LV: Effect sizes in cluster randomized designs.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. (in press).Google Scholar
  45. (45).
    Lewis CE, Jacobs DR, Jr., McCreath H, et al.: Weight gain continues in the 90’s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from the CARDIA Study.American Journal of Epidemiology. 2000,151:1172–1181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. (46).
    Dzewaltowski DA, Galsgow RE, Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Brock E: RE-AIM: Evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004,28:75–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. (47).
    Rothman AJ, Baldwin AS, Hertel AW: Self-regulation and behavior change: Disentangling behavioral initiation and behavioral maintenance. In Vohs K, Baumeister R (eds),The Handbook of Self-Regulation. New York: Guilford, 2004, 130–149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Winett
    • 1
  • Eileen S. Anderson
    • 1
  • Janet R. Wojcik
    • 1
  • Sheila G. Winett
    • 2
  • Todd Bowden
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPolytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg
  2. 2.PCR, Inc.Blacksburg

Personalised recommendations