Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response expectancies, treatment credibility, and hypnotic suggestibility: Mediator and moderator effects in hypnotic and cognitive-behavioral pain interventions

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown that response expectancies are an important mechanism of popular psychological interventions for pain. However, there has been no research on whether response expectancies and treatment credibility independently mediate hypnotic and cognitive-behavioral pain interventions and whether the pattern of mediation is affected by experience with the interventions. Also, past research has indicated that hypnotic pain interventions may be moderated by hypnotic suggestibility. However, these studies have typically failed to measure the full range of suggestibility and have assessed pain reduction and suggestibility in the same experimental context, possibly inflating the association between these variables.Purpose: To clarify the mediator role of response expectancies and treatment credibility, and the moderator role of hypnotic suggestibility in the hypnotic and cognitive-behavioral reduction of pain.Methods: Approximately 300 participants were assessed for suggestibility. Then, as part of an apparently unrelated experiment, 124 of these individuals received analogue cognitive-behavioral, hypnotic, or placebo control pain interventions.Results: Response expectancies and credibility independently mediated treatment. The extent of mediation increased as participants gained more experience with the interventions. Suggestibility moderated treatment and was associated with relief only from the hypnotic intervention.Conclusions: Response expectancies and treatment credibility are unique mechanisms of hypnotic and cognitive-behavioral pain interventions. Hypnotic suggestibility predicts relief from hypnotic pain interventions and this association is not simply an artifact of measuring suggestibility and pain reduction in the same experimental context. The relationship between suggestibility and hypnotic pain reduction appears to be linear in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okifuji A, Turk DC, Kalauokalani D: Clinical outcome and economic evaluation of multidisciplinary pain centers. In Block AR, Kremer EF, Fernandez E (eds),Handbook of Pain Syndromes: Biopsychosocial Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1998, 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Center for Health Statistics: National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 1999 summary.Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics (No. 322). Hyattsville, MD: 2001.

  3. National Center for Health Statistics: National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2000 emergency department summary.Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics (No. 326). Hyattsville, MD: 2002.

  4. Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL: Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002.Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics (No. 343). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Montgomery GH, DuHamel KN, Redd WH: A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: How effective is hypnosis?International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 2000,48:138–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patterson DR, Jensen MP: Hypnosis and clinical pain.Psychological Bulletin. 2003,129:495–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen MP, Patterson DR: Hypnotic treatment of chronic pain.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2006,29:95–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache.Pain. 1999,80:1–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Turk DC, Gatchel RJ:Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: A Practitioner Handbook (2nd Ed.). Guilford: New York, 2002.

  10. Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986,51:1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirsch I:Changing Expectations: A Key to Effective Psychotherapy. Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Milling LS, Reardon JM, Carosella GM: Mediation and moderation of psychological pain treatments: Response expectancies and hypnotic suggestibility.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2006,74:253–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker SL, Kirsch I: Hypnotic and placebo analgesia: Order effects and the placebo label.Contemporary Hypnosis. 1993,10:117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery GH, Kirsch I: Classical conditioning and the placebo effect.Pain. 1997,72:107–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirsch I: Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior.American Psychologist. 1985,40:1189–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rotter JB:Social Learning Theory and Clinical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Montgomery GH, Weltz CH, Seltz M, Bovbjerg, DH: Brief presurgery hypnosis reduces distress and pain in excisional breast biopsy patients.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 2002,50:17–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD: Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy Questionnaire.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2000,31:73–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Borkovec TD, Nau SD: Credibility of analogue therapy rationales.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 1972,3:257–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hellström K, Öst L: Prediction of outcome in the treatment of specific phobia. A cross validation study.Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1996,34:403–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirsch I, Henry D: Extinction versus credibility in the desensitization of speech anxiety.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1977,45:1052–1059.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirsch I, Henry D: Self-desentization and meditation in the reduction of public speaking anxiety.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1979,47:536–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Öst L, Stridh B, Wolf M: A clinical study of spider phobia: Prediction of outcome after self-help and therapist-directed treatments.Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1998,36:17–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gur RC: Measuring hypnotic susceptibility: A guest editorial.American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis. 1978/1979,21:64–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harmon TM, Hynan MT, Tyre TE: Improved obstetric outcomes using hypnotic analgesia and skill mastery combined with childbirth education.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1990,58:525–530.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liossi C, Hatira P: Clinical hypnosis versus cognitive behavioral training for pain management with pediatric cancer patients undergoing bone marrow aspirations.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 1999,47:104–116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Andreychuk T, Skriver C: Hypnosis and biofeedback in the treatment of migraine headache.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 1975,23:172–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedman H, Taub HA: Brief psychological training procedures in migraine treatment.American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis. 1984,26:187–200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gay M, Philipport P, Luminet O: Differential effectiveness of psychological interventions for reducing osteoarthritis pain: A comparison of Erikson hypnosis and Jacobson relaxation.European Journal of Pain. 2002,6:1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. ter Kuile MM, Spinhoven P, Linssen AC, et al.: Autogenic training and cognitive selfhypnosis for the treatment of recurrent headaches in three different subject groups.Pain. 1994,58:331–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins DC, Stam HJ, Bertrand LD: The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties.Psychological Reports. 1983,53:523–535.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Council JR, Kirsch I, Grant DL: Imagination, expectancy and hypnotic responding. In Kunzendorf RG, Spanos NP, Wallace B (eds.),Hypnosis and Imagination. Amityville, NY: Baywood, 1996, 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Spanos NP: Hypnotic behavior: A social-psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and “trance logic.”Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 1986,9:449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Forgione AG, Barber TX: A strain-gauge pain stimulator.Psychophysiology. 1971,8:102–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins, DC, et al.: The Carleton University responsiveness to suggestion scale: Stability, reliability, and relationships with expectancy, and ‘hypnotic experiences.’Psychological Reports. 1983,53:555–563.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins DC, et al.: The Carleton University responsiveness to suggestion scale: Relationships with other measures of susceptibility, expectancies and absorption.Psychological Reports. 1983,53:723–734.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Comey G, Kirsch I: Intentional and spontaneous imagery in hypnosis: The phenomenology of hypnotic responding.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 1999,47:65–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kirsch I, Lynn SJ, Rhue JW: Introduction to clinical hypnosis. In Rhue JW, Lynn SJ, Kirsch I (eds),Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1993, 3–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Spanos NP, Perlini AH, Robertson LA: Hypnosis, suggestion, and placebo in the reduction of experimental pain.Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1989,98:285–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M:Pain and Behavioral Medicine: A Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective. New York: Guilford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Melzack R, Wall PD: Pain mechanisms: A new theory.Science. 1965,150:971–979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zamansky HS, Scharf B, Brightbill R: The effect of expectancy for hypnosis on prehypnotic performance.Journal of Personality. 1964,32:236–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Price DD, Barrell JJ: Expectation and desire in pain and pain reduction. In Kirsch I (ed),How Expectancies Shape Experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999, 145–171.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Vase L, Robinson ME, Verne NG, Price D: The contributions of suggestion, desire, and expectation to placebo effects in irritable bowel syndrome patients: An empirical investigation.Pain. 2003,105:17–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Aiken LS, West SG:Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Frank JD: Therapeutic factors in psychotherapy.American Journal of Psychotherapy. 1971,25:350–361.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Grencavage LM, Norcross JC: Where are the commonalities among therapeutic common factors?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1990,21:372–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tourangeau R, Rasinski KA: Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement.Psychological Bulletin. 1988,103:299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Spanos NP, Kennedy SK, Gwynn MI: Moderating effects of contextual variables on the relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and suggested analgesia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1984,93:285–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Spanos NP, Ollerhead VG, Gwynn MI: The effects of three instructional treatments on pain magnitude and pain tolerance: Implications for theories of hypnotic analgesia.Imagination, Cognition, and Personality. 1985,5:321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Price DD, Harkins SW, Baker C: Sensory-affective relationships among different types of clinical and experimental pain.Pain. 1987,28:297–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Hartford, 200 Bloomfield Avenue, 06117, West Hartford, CT

    Leonard S. Milling Ph.D., Jessica S. Shores M.A., Elizabeth L. Coursen M.A., Deanna J. Menario M.S. & Catherine D. Farris M.S.

Authors
  1. Leonard S. Milling Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica S. Shores M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elizabeth L. Coursen M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deanna J. Menario M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Catherine D. Farris M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard S. Milling Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Milling, L.S., Shores, J.S., Coursen, E.L. et al. Response expectancies, treatment credibility, and hypnotic suggestibility: Mediator and moderator effects in hypnotic and cognitive-behavioral pain interventions. ann. behav. med. 33, 167–178 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879898

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879898

Keywords

Search

Navigation