Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plant indicators—concept and status

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Aldous, A. E. Effect of burning on Kansas blue stem pastures. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul.38: 1–65. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antevs, E. Rainfall and tree growth in the Great Basin. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. 469: 1–97. (Amer. Geo. Soc. N. Y. Pub. 21.) 1938.

  3. Baker, F. S. Character of the soil in relation to the reproduction of western yellow pine. Jour. For. 23: 630–634. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  4. -. Theory and practice of silviculture. 502 p. 1934.

  5. — andKorstian, C. F. Suitability of brush lands in the intermountain region for the growth of natural or planted western yellow pine forests. U. S. D. A. Bul. 256: 1–83. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balandin, V. N. K. Postanooke Voprosa O Rasteniiakh Indicatorkh (Plant Indicators). U. S. F. S. Division of Silvios Translation 304: 1–10. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barrington, A. H. M. Forest soil and vegetation in the Hlaing Forest Circle Burma. Burma For. Bul. 25 (Ecol. Ser. 1) 1–95. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beath, O. A., Draize, J. H., andGilbert, C. S. Plants poisonous to livestock. Wyoming Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 200: 1–84. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braun-Blanquet, J. Plant sociology. 438 p. 1932.

  10. Briggs, L. J., andShantz, H. L. The water requirement of plants. I. Investigations in the Great Plains in 1910 and 1911. U. S. D. A. Bur. Pl. Ind. Bul. 284: 1–49. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ——. Relative water requirement of plants. Jour. Agr. Res. 3: 1–63. 1914.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ——. Daily transpiration during the normal growth period and its correlation with the weather. Jour. Agr. Res. 7: 155–212. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brunkman, A. H. Mosses in relation to Cajander theory of forest types. Forestry Chron. 12: 300–314. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cajander, A. K. Theory of forest types. Acta Forestalia Fennica 29: 1–108. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell, R. S. andBomberger, E. H. Occurrence ofGutierrezia sarothrae onBouteloua eriopoda ranges in southern New Mexico. Ecology 15: 49–61. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. —, andCrafts, E. C. Tentative range utilization standards. Southwestern Forest and Range Exp. Sta. Res. Note 26: 1–4. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chamberlin, T. C. Native vegetation. Geology of Wisconsin. Survey of 1873–1877, vol. II: 176–188. 1877.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke, S. E. Pasture investigations of the short grass plains of Saskatchewan and Alberta. Sci. Agr. 10: 732–749. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Clements, F. E. Plant succession and indicators. 453 p. 1928.

  20. —. Experimental ecology in public service. Ecology 16: 342–363. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Comber, N. M. An introduction to the scientific study of the soil. 208 p. 1932.

  22. Cooper, W. S. Ancient dunes of the upper Mississippi Valley as possible climatic indicators. Amer. Meteor. Soc. Bul. 19: 193–204. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cooperrider, C. K. andHendricks, B. A. Soil erosion and stream flow on range and forest lands of the upper Rio Grande watershed in relation to land resources and human welfare. U. S. D. A. Tech. Bul. 567:1–88. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Craddock, G. W. andForsling, C. L. The influence of climate and grazing on spring-fall sheep range in southern Idaho. U. S. D. A. Tech. Bul. 600: 1–42. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Crafts, E. C. Height-volume distribution in range grasses. Jour. For. 36:1182–1185. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  26. —, andWall, L. A. Tentative range utilization standards. Southwestern Forest and Range Exp. Sta. Res. Note 25: 1–3. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davis, T. A. W. andRichards, P. W. The vegetation of Moraballi Creek, British Guiana: an ecological study of a limited area of tropical rain forest. Part II. Jour. Ecol. 22: 106–155. 1934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Davis, W. E. and Sampson, A. W. Experiment in correlation of tree growth rings and precipitation cycles. Amer. Geophysical Union Trans. 17th Ann. Meeting. 493–496. 1936.

  29. Davy, J. B. Alkali and the alkali indicators of the Glenn county “Gooselands.” California Agr. Exp. Sta. Rpt. 1898–1901: 29–33. 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  30. DeCandolle, A. P. Géographie botanique raisonée. 1365 p. 1855.

  31. Douglass, A. E. Climatic cycles and tree-growth. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. 289: 1–127. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  32. —. Tree rings and chronology. Univ. Ariz. Bul. (Phy. Sci. Bul. 1) 8(4): 1–36. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Duley, F. L. andMiller, M. F. Erosion and surface runoff under different conditions. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 63: 1–50. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dunnewald, T. J. Vegetation as an indicator of the fertility of sandy pine plain soils in northern Wisconsin. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 10: 19–23. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dunning, D. A tree classification for the selection forests of the Sierra Nevada. Jour. Agr. Res.36: 755–771. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eliason, E. J. Buckwheat as an indicator of the relative nitrogen requirement of conifers. Jour. For. 33: 628–629. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Forsling, C. L. A study of the influence of herbaceous plant cover on surface run-off and soil erosion in relation to grazing on the Wasatch Plateau in Utah. U. S. D. A. Tech. Bul. 220: 1–72. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gano, L. A study in physiographic ecology in northern Florida. Bot. Gaz.63: 337–372. 1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Glendening, G. E. Litter aids germination of grass seeds and establishment of seedlings. Southwestern Forest and Range Exp. Sta. Res. Note7: 1–2. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  40. —. A method of revegetating small key plots on eroded areas. Southwestern Forest and Range Exp. Sta. Res. Note8: 1–2. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Glock, W. S. Principles and methods of tree-ring analysis. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. 486: 1–100. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gordon, A. and Sampson, A. W. Composition of common California foothill plants as a factor in range management. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1938. (In press.)

  43. Greene, E. L. Landmarks of botanical history. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 54: 1–329. 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Griggs, R. F. The vegetation of the Katmai district. Ecology 17: 380–417. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Haig, I. T. Colloidal content and related soil factors as indicators of site quality. Yale Univ. School For. Bul. 24: 1–29. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Halden, B. E. Marktorkan o sandoch grusmarker [soil dryness on sand gravel soils] (with German summary) Skogsvårdsfor. Tidskr. 30: 37–131. 1932. (Abstracted from Biological Abstracts.)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hall, H. M. andGrinnell, J. Life zone indicators in California. Proc. California Acad. Sci. Ser. 4(9): 37–67. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hanson, H. C. Revegetation of waste range land. Col. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 332: 1–9. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  49. —. Characteristics of major grassland types in western North Dakota. Ecol. Mon. 8: 57–114. 1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Harper, R. M. The limestone prairies of Wilcox, Alabama. Ecology 1: 198–203. 1920.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Harris, J. A., Gortner, R. A., Hoffman, W. F., Lawrence, J. V. andValentine, A. T. The osmotic concentration, specific electrical conductivity, and chlorid content of the tissue fluids of the indicator plants of Tooele Valley, Utah. Jour. Agr. Res.27: 893–924. 1924.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hatton, J. H. Livestock grazing as a factor in fire protection on the national forests. U. S. D. A. Dept. Cir.134: 1–11. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hazard, H. E. Plant indicators of pure white pine sites in southern New Hampshire. Jour. For.35: 477–486. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Heimburger, C. The soil question in Canadian forestry. For. Chron.9(4): 66–73. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  55. —. Forest type studies in the Adirondack region. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Mem. 165: 1–122. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hicock, H. W., Morgan, M. F., Lutz, H. J., Bull, H. andLunt, H. A. The relation of forest composition and rate of growth to certain soil characters. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 330: 677–750. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hilgard, E. W. Report on the geology and agriculture of the state of Mississippi. 391 p. 1860.

  58. —. The effects of lime in soils on the development of plants. Soc. Prom. Agr. Sci. Proc.7: 32–37. 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  59. -. Soils. 593 p. 1912.

  60. Hole, R. S. andSingh, P. Oecology of sal (Shorea robusta). Part II. Seedling reproduction in natural forests and its improvement. Indian For. Rec.5: 241–283. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hopkins, A. D. andMurray, M. A. Natural guides to the beginning, length, and progress of the seasons. Acta Phaenologica2: 33–44. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ingram, D. C. Vegetative changes and grazing use on Douglas fir cutover land. Jour. Agr. Res.43: 387–418. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Jardine, J. T. andAnderson, M. Range management on the national forests. U. S. D. A. Bul. 790: 1–98. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kearney, T. H., Briggs, L. J., Shantz, H. L., McLane, J. W. andPiemeisel, R. L. Indicator significance of vegetation in Tooele Valley, Utah. Jour. Agr. Res.1: 365–417. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Keen, F. P. Climatic cycles in eastern Oregon as indicated by tree rings. Monthly Weather Rev.65: 175–188. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kelley, A. P. Plant indicators of soil types. Soil Sci.13: 411–423. 1922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. King, W. On the bogs and sloughs of Ireland. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London15: 948. 1685.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kivinen, E. Ahosuolaheinan (Rumex acetosella) Kasvupaikkojen reaktiosta. Maataloustieteellinen Aikakauskirja (Helsinki) 3: 10–16. 1931. (Abstracted from Biological Abstracts.)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Korstian, C. F. Indicator significance of native vegetation in the determination of forest sites. Plant World 20: 267–287. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  70. —. Native vegetation as a criterion of site. Plant World22: 253–261. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kraebel, C. J. Erosion control on mountain roads. U. S. D. A. Cir. 380: 1–45. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kramer, J. andWeaver, J. E. Relative efficiency of roots and tops of plants in protecting the soil from erosion. Univ. Neb. Con. Dept. Bul. 12: 1–94. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lazenby, W. R. The absence of certain native plants in soils containing a large percentage of lime. Soc. Prom. Agr. Sci. Proc.8: 63–65. 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lister, P. B. Seasonal utilization of forage plants. The Cattleman25: 29–30. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Livingston, B. E. The relation of soils to natural vegetation. Geol. Surv. Mich. Ann. Rep. 9–30. 1903.

  76. Lowdermilk, W. C. Influence of forest litter on runoff, percolation, and erosion. Jour. For.28: 474–491. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  77. -. Managing brush and forest lands primarily for the yield of irrigation water. Cal. Forest and Range Exp. Sta. 1931. (Mimeographed report.)

  78. —. Certain aspects of the role of vegetation in erosion control. Iowa St. Col. Jour. Sci.9: 123–132. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Macdonald, W. A. Testing soils by the colors of the plant foliage. Amer. Agr.53: 61–62. 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Markley, M. C. Archeology as a tool for use in predicting the permanency of agriculture. Science86: 492–493. 1937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. McDougall, W. B. Plant ecology. 338 p. 1931.

  82. Merriam, C. H. Life zones and crop zones of the United States. U. S. D. A. Biol. Surv. Bul. 10: 1–79. 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Morgan, M. F. Land cover studies as a basis for a more accurate interpretation of the soil survey. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.16: 452–458. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Muller, C. H. Plants as indicators of climate in northeast Mexico. Amer. Mid. Nat.18: 986–1000. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Nelson, E. W. The influence of precipitation and grazing upon black grama grass range. U. S. D. A. Tech. Bul. 409: 1–32. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Nordenskiold, E. The history of biology. 629 p. 1935.

  87. Owe, J. L. The effect of nitrification upon the vegetation and forest reproduction in some of the California pine forests. 37 p. Univ. Cal. Master’s thesis. 1930.

  88. Parker, K. W. andSampson, A. W. Growth and yield of certain Gramineae as influenced by reduction of photosynthetic tissue. Hilgardia 5: 361–381. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Pearson, G. A. What is the proper basis for the classification of forest land into types? Proc. Soc. Amer. For.8: 79–84. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  90. —. Natural reproduction of western yellow pine in the Southwest. U. S. D. A. Bul. 1105. 1–144. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  91. —. Forest types in the Southwest as determined by climate and soil. U. S. D. A. Tech. Bul. 247: 1–144. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Petersen, Asmus.. Taxation von Ackerlanderein auf Grund des Naturlichen Pflanzenbestandes von Ackerland und Ackerrand. 1–129. Reinhold Ruhn. Berlin. (Abstracted from Biological Abstracts.) 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Pinckney, R. M. Sorghum as an indicator of available soil-nitrogen. Soil Sci.17: 315–321. 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Ramann, E. Forstliche Bodenkunde und Standortslehre. 479 p. 1893.

  95. Ratzeburg, J. T. C. Die Standortsgewachse und Unkrauter Deutschlands und der Schweiz in Ihren Beziehungen zu Forst-, Garten-, und Landwirthschaft und zu anderen Fachern. 487 p. 1859.

  96. Raunkiaer, C. The life forms of plants. 632 p. 1934.

  97. Renner, F. G. Conditions influencing erosion on the Boise River watershed. U. S. D. A. Tech. Bul. 528: 1–32. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Roe, E. I. Forest soils the basis of forest management. 9 p. Lake States For. Exp. Sta. 1935.

  99. Romell, L. G. andHeiberg, S. O. Types of humus layer in the forests of northeastern United States. Ecology12: 567–608. 1931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Sampson, A. W. The relation of soil acidity to plant societies. Proc. Soc. Amer. For.7: 51–57. 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  101. —. The reseeding of depleted grazing lands to cultivated forage plants. U. S. D. A. Bul. 4: 1–34. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  102. —. Plant succession in relation to range management. U. S. D. A. Bul. 791: 1–76. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  103. -. Range and pasture management. 421 p. 1923.

  104. —, andMalmsten, H. E. Grazing periods and forage production on the national forests. U. S. D. A. Bul. 1405: 1–54. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  105. —, andMcCarty, E. C. The carbohydrate metabolism ofStipa pulchra. Hilgardia5: 61–100. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. —, andWeyl, L. H. Range preservation and its relation to erosion control on western grazing lands. U. S. D. A. Bul. 675: 1–35. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Sarvis, J. T. Composition and density of the native vegetation in the vicinity of the Northern Great Plains Field Station. Jour. Agr. Res.19: 63–72. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  108. —. Effects of different systems and intensities of grazing upon the native vegetation at the Northern Great Plains Field Station. U. S. D. A. Bul. 1170: 1–45. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Scofield, C. S. andWilcox, L. V. Boron in irrigation waters. U. S. D. A. Tech. Bul. 264: 1–66. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Shantz, H. L. Natural vegetation as an indicator of the capabilities of land for crop production in the Great Plains area. U. S. D. A. Bur. Pl. Ind. Bul. 201: 1–100. 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  111. —, andPiemeisel, R. L. Indicator significance of the natural vegetation of the southwestern desert region. Jour. Agr. Res.28: 721–802. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  112. -,and Zon, R. Atlas of American agriculture—natural vegetation. 29 p. 1924.

  113. Show, S. B. andKotok, E. I. Cover type and fire control in the national forests of northern California. U. S. D. A. Bul. 1495: 1–36. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Sinclair, J. D. andSampson, A. W. Establishment and succession of vegetation on different soil horizons. Hilgardia 5: 155–174. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Smith, J. G. Grazing problems in the Southwest and how to meet them. U. S. D. A. Div. Agrost. Bul. 16: 1–46. 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Spaulding, P. Estimating the length of time that trees have been dead in northern New England. Jour. For.35: 393–395. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Spence, L. E. Root studies of important range plants of the Boise River watershed. Jour. For.35: 747–754. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Sprague, R. The association ofCercosporella herpotrichoides with theFestuca consociation. Phytopath.24: 669–676. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Stanley, O. B. Indicator significance of lesser vegetation in the Yale Forest near Keene, New Hampshire. Ecology 19: 188–207. 1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Sweet, A. T. Soil profile and root penetration as indicators of apple production in the lake shore district of western New York. U. S. D. A. Cir. 303: 1–30. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Talbot, M. W. Indicators of southwestern range conditions. U. S. D. A. Farmers’ Bul. 1782: 1–35. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Tansley, A. G. and Chipp, T. F. Aims and methods in the study of vegetation. 383 p. 1926.

  123. Thurmann, J. Essai de phytostatique appliquée á la chaine du Jura et aux contrées viosines. 2 V. in 1. Berne, Jent et Gessmann. 1849.

  124. Tihomirov, I. K. The complex geographic method for the study of climate. 13 p. Translation from the original unpublished Russian manuscript. 1938.

  125. Trelease, S. F. andTrelease, H. M. Selenium as a stimulating and possibly essential element for indicator plants. Amer. Jour. Bot.25: 372–380. 1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Trenk, F. B. The occurrence of hickories in Iowa in relation to soil types. Proc. 1st. Int. Cong. Soil Sci. Comm. V: 318–322. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Turesson, G. Die Pflanzenart als Klimatindikator. Kungl. Fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund. Förhandl.2: 1–35. (Abstracted from Biological Abstracts.) 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Turner, L. M. Some soil characteristics influencing the distribution of forest types and rate of growth in Arkansas. Jour. For.35: 5–11. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. —. Some profile characteristics of the pine-growing soils of the coastal-plain region of Arkansas. Ark. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 361: 1–52. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Unger, F. Ueber den Einfluss des Bodens auf die Verteilung der Gewächse, nachgeweisen in der Vegetation des nordostlichen Tirol’s. 367 p. 1836.

  131. U. S. Forest Service. Range plant handbook. U. S. Gov’t Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Upson, A. and Cribbs, W. V. Occurrence of shrubs on range areas in southeastern Arizona. Ariz. Agr. Exp. Sta. Rpt. 30 p. 1937. Mimeographed.

  133. Voorhies, E. C., andKoughan, A. B. Economic aspects of the beef cattle industry. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 461: 1–128. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Wahlenberg, W. G. Effect of ceanothus brush on western yellow pine plantations in the northern Rocky Mountains. Jour. Agr. Res. 41: 601–612. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Warner, S. R. Distribution of native plants and weeds on certain soil types in eastern Texas. Bot. Gaz.82: 345–372. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Weaver, J. E. and Clements, F. E. Plant ecology. 520 p. 1929.

  137. Wedell, W. R. Dust bowls of the past. Science86: 2232. Supplement 8–9. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Westveld, R. H. The relation of certain soil characteristics to forest growth and composition in the northern hardwood forest of northern Michigan. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 135: 1–52. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Wherry, E. T. Soil test of Ericaceae and other reaction-sensitive families in northern Vermont and New Hampshire. Rhodora22: 33–49. 1920.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. —. Observations on the soil acidity of Ericaceae and associated plants in the middle Atlantic states. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 72: 84–111. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  141. —. Plant distribution around salt marshes in relation to soil acidity. Ecology 1: 42–48. 1920.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. —. Correlation between vegetation and soil acidity in southern New Jersey. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.72: 113–119. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Forestry, University of California, USA

    Arthur W. Sampson

Authors
  1. Arthur W. Sampson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sampson, A.W. Plant indicators—concept and status. Bot. Rev 5, 155–206 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02878423

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02878423

Keywords

Search

Navigation