Advertisement

Advances in Therapy

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1192–1201 | Cite as

Relationship between thigh skinfold measurement, hand grip strength, and trunk muscle endurance: Differences between the sexes

  • Fadime DoymazEmail author
  • Ugur Cavlak
Article

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the relationship between thigh skinfold measurement, hand grip strength, and trunk muscle endurance and compare this relationship in men and women. The current study included 200 healthy subjects (111 women and 89 men), with a mean age of 31.58±13.78 y. Trunk muscle endurance was evaluated with the use of curl-up, horizontal side bridge, and static back endurance tests. Significant differences were found between women and men in performance of the curl-up and horizontal side bridge tests (P< .05); however, no significant difference was found between the sexes in the static back endurance test scores (P≥.05). The investigators discerned a significant negative correlation between thigh skinfold measurements and all trunk muscle endurance tests in female patients (curl-up,r=−.501; horizontal side bridge,r=−.454; static back,r=−.479;P< .05). A rather weak correlation was found in male patients (curl-up,r=−.348; horizontal side bridge,r=−.182; static back,r=−.330;P< .05). On the other hand, no significant correlation was found between hand grip strength and trunk muscle endurance test scores in female patients (P≥.05), although a significant positive correlation was found in male patients in curl-up and side bridge test results (curl-up,r=.319; horizontal side bridge,r=.307; static back,r=.123;P< .05). The results of this study suggest that women have lower endurance test scores compared with men. The investigators detected the presence of a significant negative correlation between thigh skinfold measurement and trunk muscle endurance tests in both men and women and concluded that there is a positive significant relationship between hand grip strength, curl-up, and horizontal side bridge tests. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between muscle endurance and physical characteristics as they relate to the sex of the individual.

Keywords

trunk muscle endurance skinfold measurements grip strength healthy subjects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Heyward VH.Advanced Fitness and Exercise Prescription. New Mexico: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1997:101–119.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moffroid MT. Endurance of trunk muscles in persons with chronic low back pain: assessment, performance, training.J Rehabil Res Dev. 1997;34:440–447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stevens VK, Bouche KG, Mahieu NN, Coorevits PL, Vanderstraeten GG, Danneels LA. Trunk muscle activity in healthy subjects during bridging stabilization exercises.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wagner H, Anders CH, Puta CH, et al. Musculoskeletal support of lumbar spine stability.Pathophysiology. 2005;12:257–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKeon MD, Albert WJ, Neary JP. Assessment of neuromuscular and haemodynamic activity in individuals with and without chronic low back pain.Dyn Med. 2006;31:5–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ito T, Shirado O, Suzuki H, Takahashi M, Kaneda K, Strax TE. Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: an inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77:75–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alaranta H, Luoto S, Heliovaara M, Hurri H. Static back endurance and the risk of low-back pain.Clin Biomech. 1995;10:323–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh AS, Chin A, Paw MJ, Bosscher RJ, van Mechelen W. Cross-sectional relationship between physical fitness components and functional performance in older persons living in long-term care facilities.BMC Geriatr. 2006;7:4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delmonico MJ, Kostek MC, Doldo NA, et al. Effects of moderate-velocity strength training on peak muscle power and movement velocity: do women respond differently than men?J Appl Physiol. 2005;99:1712–1718.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Biering-Sorensen F. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low back trouble over a one-year period.Spine. 1984;9:106–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lariviere C, Gravel D, Gagnon D, et al. Gender influence on fatigability of back muscles during intermittent isometric contractions: a study of neuromuscular activation patterns.Clin Biomech. 2006;21:893–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodriguez G, Samper MP, Olivares JL, Ventura P, Moreno LA, Perez-Gonzalez JM. Skinfold measurements at birth: sex and anthropometric influence.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:273–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Connor TE, Lamb KL. The effects of Bodymax high-repetition resistance training on measures of body composition and muscular strength in active adult women.J Strength Cond Res. 2003; 17:614–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huttunen NP, Knip M, Paavilainen T. Physical activity and fitness in obese children.Int J Obes. 1986;10:519–525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ward DS, Trost SG, Felton G, et al. Physical activity and physical fitness in African-American girls with and without obesity.Obes Res. 1997;5:572–577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilder RP, Greene JA, Winters KL, Long WB III, Gubler K, Edlich RF. Physical fitness assessment: an update.J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2006;16:193–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pedersen AN, Ovesen L, Schroll M, Avlund K, Era P. Body composition of 80-year-old men and women and its relation to muscle strength, physical activity and functional ability.J Nutr Health Aging. 2002;6:413–420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Szeto GP, Lam P. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in urban bus drivers of Hong Kong.J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:181–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith DA, Ness EM, Herbert R, et al. Abdominal diameter index: a more powerful anthropometric measure for prevalent coronary heart disease risk in adult males.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005;7: 370–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Claessens M, Claessens C, Claessens P, Henderieckx J, Claessens J. Importance of determining the percentage body fat in endurance-trained athletes.Indian Heart J. 2000;52:307–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilmore JH, Despres JP, Stanforth PR, et al. Alterations in body weight and composition consequent to 20 week of endurance training: the Herigate Family Study.Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:346–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hebert R. Isometric grip endurance of healthy elderly men and women.Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1997;24:75–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moreau CE, Green BN, Johnson CD, Moreau SR. Isometric back extension endurance tests: a review of the literature.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:110–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliovaara M, Soukka A, Harju R. Non-dynamometric trunk performance tests: reliability and normative data.Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26:211–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Demoulin C, Vanderthommen M, Duysens C, Crielaard JM. Spinal muscle evaluation using the Sorensen test: a critical appraisal of the literature.Joint Bone Spine. 2006;73:43–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Payne N, Gledhill N, Katzmarzyk PT, Jamnik VK, Keir PJ. Canadian musculoskeletal fitness norms.Can J Appl Physiol. 2000;25:430–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clark BC, Manini TM, The DJ, Doldo NA, Ploutz-Snyder LL. Gender differences in skeletal muscle fatigability are related to contraction type and EMG spectral compression.J Appl Physiol. 2003;94:2263–2272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fink B, Thanzami V, Seydel H, Manning JT. Digit ratio and hand-grip strength in German and Mizos men: cross-cultural evidence for an organizing effect of prenatal testosterone on strength.Am J Hum Biol. 2006;18:776–782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carter SL, Rennie CD, Hamilton SJ, Tarnopolsky MA. Changes in skeletal muscle in males and females following endurance training.Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2001;79:386–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Albert W, Wrigley A, McLean R, Sleivert G. Sex differences in the rate of fatigue development and recovery.Dyn Med. 2006;16:2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Evans K, Refshauge KM, Adams R. Trunk muscle endurance tests: reliability and gender differences in athletes.J Sci Med Sport. 2006 Nov 30; [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eston RG, Rowlands AV, Charlesworth S, Davies A, Hoppitt T. Prediction of DXA-determined whole body fat from skinfolds: importance of including skinfolds from the thigh and calf in young, healthy men and women.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:695–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Raudsepp L, Jurimae T. Physical activity, aerobic fitness and fatness in preadolescent children.Sports Med Training Rehabil. 1998;8:123–131.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bandini LG, Schoeller DA, Dietz WH. Energy expenditure in obese and non-obese adolescents.Pediatr Res. 1990;27:198–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    DeLany JP, Harsha DW, Kime JC, Kumler J, Melancon L, Bray GA. Energy expenditure in lean and obese prepubertal children.Obes Res. 1995;3:67–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Deforche B, Lefevre J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Hills AP, Duquet W, Bouckaert J. Physical fitness and physical activity in obese and nonobese Flemish youth.Obes Res. 2003;11:434–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nader GA. Concurrent strength and endurance training: from molecules to man.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1965–1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ravisankar P, Madanmohan, Udupa K, Prakash ES. Correlation between body mass index and blood pressure indices, handgrip strength and handgrip endurance in underweight, normal weight and overweight adolescents.Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;49:455–461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Eliakim A, Burke GS, Cooper DM. Fitness, fatness, and the effect of training assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and skinf old-thickness measurements in healthy adolescent females.Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:223–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Health Communications Inc 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Denizli Medical Center Physical Therapy DepartmentTurkish Red Crescent SocietyDenizliTurkey
  2. 2.School of Physical Therapy and RehabilitationPamukkale UniversityDenizliTurkey

Personalised recommendations