Skip to main content

Prophylaxis with lactoferrin, a novel antimicrobial agent, in a neonatal rat model of coinfection

Abstract

Lactoferrin has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and the authors hypothesized that recombinant human lactoferrin (Talactoferrin alfa [TLF]) would reduce mortality and morbidity in a coinfection model. The MIC50 (minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of organisms) of TLF againstCandida albicans andStaphylococcus epidermidis was determined. Neonatal Wistar rats were infected withCalbicans orS epidermidis or both, at doses of 2 × 108 colony-forming units (CFUs) given subcutaneously. Rat pups in each group were randomly given TLF intraperitoneally at 40 mg/kg/dose or 300 mg/kg/dose, or saline in 0.2 mL, once a day for 4 d and were monitored for mortality, weight gain, and blood culture positivity. Trough serum levels of TLF were measured at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 144 h. MIC50 of TLF was 30 μg/mL and 500 μg/mL forC albicans and Sepidermidis, respectively. TLF prophylaxis significantly improved survival in the coinfection group at 40 mg/kg/dose (by 16.1%; P=.019) and at 300 mg/kg/dose (by 15.1%; P=.027) and in the Sepidermidis group at a dose of 40 mg/kg/dose (by 1 8.6%; P=.04). Weight gain was not affected by TLF prophylaxis. Serum trough levels of TLF were 1000-fold lower than in vitro MIC50. The authors conclude that lactoferrin prophylaxis significantly enhanced survival in coinfection and in the subgroupof S epidermidis infection (40 mg/kg/dose) through indirect mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Kaufman D, Fairchild KD. Clinical microbiology of bacterial and fungal sepsis in very-low-birthweight infants.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:638–680, Table of Contents.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network.Pediatrics. 2002;110:285–291.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, et al. A controlled trial of intravenous immune globulin to reduce nosocomial infections in very-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1107–1113.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Faix RG, Kovarik SM. Polymicrobial sepsis among intensive care nursery infants.J Perinatol. 1989;9:131–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection.JAMA. 2004;292:2357–2365.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Venkatesh MP, Pham D, Fein M, et al. Neonatal coinfection model of coagulase-negative staphylococcus (Staphylococcus epidermidis) andCandida albicans: fluconazole prophylaxis enhances survival and growth.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1240–1245.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hennart PF, Brasseur DJ, Delogne-Desnoeck JB, et al. Lysozyme, lactoferrin, and secretory immunoglobulin A content in breast milk: influence of duration of lactation, nutrition status, prolactin status, and parity of mother.Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53:32–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Masson PL, Heremans JF. Lactoferrin in milk from different species.Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1971;39:119–129.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Masson P, Heremans J, Dive C. An iron-binding protein common to many external secretions.Clin Chim Acta. 1966;14:735–739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Masson P, Heremans JF, Schonne E. Lactoferrin, an iron-binding protein in neutrophilic leukocytes.J Exp Med. 1969;130:643–658.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennett RM, Kokocinski T. Lactoferrin content of peripheral blood cells.Br J Haematol. 1978; 39:509–521.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leitch EC, Willcox MD. Lactoferrin increases the susceptibility ofS. epidermidis biofilms to lysozyme and vancomycin.Curr Eye Res. 1999;19:12–19.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu YY, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP, et al. In vitro susceptibility ofCandida species to lactoferrin.Med Mycol. 1999;37:35–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ward PP, Piddington CS, Cunningham GA, et al. A system for production of commercial quantities of human lactoferrin: a broad spectrum natural antibiotic.Biotechnology (NY). 1995;13:498–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Approved Standard. 2nd ed. Wayne, Pa: NCCLS; 2002. NCCLS Document M27-A2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hawser SP, Norris H, Jessup CJ, Ghannoum MA. Comparison of a 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) colorimetric method with the standardized National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards method of testing clinical yeast isolates for susceptibility to antifungal agents.J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1450–1452.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cerca N, Martins S, Cerca F, et al. Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:331–336.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).Methods for Dilution in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard. 6th ed. Wayne, Pa: NCCLS; 2003. NCCLS Document M7-A6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carlson E, Johnson G. Protection byCandida albicans ofStaphylococcus aureus in the establishment of dual infection in mice.Infect Immun. 1985;50:655–659.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carlson E. Effect of strain ofStaphylococcus aureus on synergism withCandida albicans resulting in mouse mortality and morbidity.Infect Immun. 1983;42:285–292.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carlson E. Synergistic effect ofCandida albicans andStaphylococcus aureus on mouse mortality.Infect Immun. 1982;38:921–924.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adam B, Baillie GS, Douglas LJ. Mixed species biofilms ofCandida albicans andStaphylococcus epidermidis.J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:344–349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayala A, Chaudry IH. Immune dysfunction in murine polymicrobial sepsis: mediators, macrophages, lymphocytes and apoptosis.Shock. 1996;6(suppl 1):S27-S38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siddiqui AM, Cui X, Wu R, et al. The anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin in an experimental model of sepsis is mediated by up-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorgamma.Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1874–1882.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moreno SE, Alves-Filho JC, Rios-Santos F, et al. Signaling via platelet-activating factor receptors accounts for the impairment of neutrophil migration in polymicrobial sepsis.J Immunol. 2006; 177:1264–1271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Maier S, Emmanuilidis K, Entleutner M, et al. Massive chemokine transcription in acute renal failure due to polymicrobial sepsis.Shock. 2000;14:187–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Flohe SB, Agrawal H, Schmitz D, et al. Dendritic cells during polymicrobial sepsis rapidly mature but fail to initiate a protective Th1-type immune response.J Leukoc Biol. 2006;79:473–481.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Franklin GA, Turina M, Kuhn JF, et al. Organ specific apoptosis following polymicrobial intraperitoneal infection.Inflamm Res. 2006;55:36–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ayala A, Chung CS, Xu YX, et al. Increased inducible apoptosis in CD4+ T lymphocytes during polymicrobial sepsis is mediated by Fas ligand and not endotoxin.Immunology. 1999;97:45–55.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Farnaud S, Evans RW Lactoferrin—a multifunctional protein with antimicrobial properties.Mol Immunol. 2003;40:395–405.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Orsi N. The antimicrobial activity of lactoferrin: current status and perspectives.Biometals. 2004; 17:189–196.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Legrand D, Elass E, Pierce A, et al. Lactoferrin and host defense: an overview of its immunomodulating and anti-inflammatory properties.Biometals. 2004;17:225–229.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kruzel ML, Harari Y, Mailman D, et al. Differential effects of prophylactic, concurrent and therapeutic lactoferrin treatment on LPS-induced inflammatory responses in mice.Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;130:25–31.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Leitch EC, Willcox MD. Elucidation of the antistaphylococcal action of lactoferrin and lysozyme.J Med Microbiol. 1999;48:867–871.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wakabayashi H, Abe S, Okutomi T, et al. Cooperativeanti-Candida effects of lactoferrin or its peptides in combination with azole antifungal agents.Microbiol Immunol. 1996;40:821–825.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wakabayashi H, Okutomi T, Abe S, et al. Enhancedanti-Candida activity of neutrophils and azole antifungal agents in the presence of lactoferrin-related compounds.Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;443:229–237.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Peen E, Johansson A, Engquist M, et al. Hepatic and extrahepatic clearance of circulating human lactoferrin: an experimental study in rat.Eur J Haematol. 1998;61:151–159.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wakabayashi H, Kuwata H, Yamauchi K, et al. No detectable transfer of dietary lactoferrin or its functional fragments to portal blood in healthy adult rats.Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2004; 68:853–860.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Harris MC, D’Angio CT, Gallagher PR, et al. Cytokine elaboration in critically ill infants with bacterial sepsis, necrotizing entercolitis, or sepsis syndrome: correlation with clinical parameters of inflammation and mortality.J Pediatr. 2005;147:462–468.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shapiro N, Howell MD, Bates DW, et al. The association of sepsis syndrome and organ dysfunction with mortality in emergency department patients with suspected infection.Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:583–590.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sprung CL, Sakr Y, Vincent JL, et al. An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely ill Patients (SOAP) study.Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:421–427.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Edde L, Hipolito RB, Hwang FF, et al. Lactoferrin protects neonatal rats from gut-related systemic infection.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281:GU40-G1150.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gomez HF, Ochoa TJ, Herrera-Insua I, et al. Lactoferrin protects rabbits fromShigella flexneri-induced inflammatory enteritis.Infect Immun. 2002;70:7050–7053.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tran TV, Weisman LE. Dexamethasone effects on group B streptococcal infection in newborn rats.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23:47–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohan Pammi Venkatesh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venkatesh, M.P., Pham, D., Kong, L. et al. Prophylaxis with lactoferrin, a novel antimicrobial agent, in a neonatal rat model of coinfection. Adv Therapy 24, 941–954 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02877698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02877698

Keywords

  • lactoferrin
  • coinfection
  • Staphylococcus
  • Candida
  • neonate