Skip to main content
Log in

Separating brown and black bears in northeast China using tooth measurements

  • Published:
Journal of Northeast Forestry University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An expeditious method for ascertaining species between black bear (Seienarctos thibetanus G. cuiver) and brown bear (Ursus arctos Linnaeus) was developed using tooth measurements from previously identified specimens. The measurement and analysis on 18 tooth measurement indexes (i.e. T1. Length of Pm1-Pm4, T2. L. of M1-M3, T3. M1L., T4. M1 width, T5. M2L., T6. M2W., T7. M3L., T8. M3W., T9. L. of C1 alveolus, T10. W. of C1 alveolus, T11. L. of C1-M2, T12. L. of Pm 4M2, T13.M1L., T14. M1W., T15. M2L., T16. M2W., T17.L. of C1 alveolus, T18. W. of C1 alveolus) of 59 skulls (black bears 25, brown bears 34) indicates that there are significant or the most significant difference between two species in every indexes, however T1, T9, T10, T17 and T18 are not suitable for species discriminator because of their high percent of overlap. The efficient species discriminators and standards (mm) are as follows T2(63.0), T3(22.0), T4(10.2), T5(23.8), T6(13.6), T7(18.0), T8(13.5), T11(110.0), T12(66.0), T13(20.1), T14(15.8), T15(33.0) and T16(17.3). Those who are less than or equal to standard are classified to black bear, the others are brown bear. The method is very convenient and useful with high reliability. Their lowest accuracy percent are 95.0%, most of them over 97%. Different indexes will be chosen refer to the degree of specimen destroyed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gorton, Kenneth R., G. Victor Morejohn. 1975. Sexing black bear skulls using lower canine and lower molar measurements. J. Wildl. Manage. 39(1): 40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurten, B. 1955. Sex dimorphism and size trends in the cave bear,Ursus spelaeus Rosenmuller and Heinroth. Acta Zoologica Fennica 90: 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kurten. 1964. The evolution of the polar bear,Ursus maritimus Phipps. Acta Zoologica Fennica 108: 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kurten, B. 1964. The evolution of the polar bear,Ursus maritimus Phipps. Acta Zoologica Fennica 108:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Larsen, Thor 1971. Sexual dimorphism in the molar rows of the polar bear. J. Wildl. Manage. 35(2):374–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Xiangwen, Xiao Qianzhu 1986. Age composition, sex ratio and reproduction of bears in Heilongjiang province, China. Acta Theriologica Sinica 6(3): 161–170

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pei Jiaqi, Wu Yuqi 1990. Sexual dimorphism in the mandible of the Taiwan Reeves’ muntjac. Acta Theriologica Sinica 10(4): 248–254

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rausch, R. L. 1961. Notes on the black bear,Ursus americanus Pallas, in Alaska, with particular reference to dentition and growth. Zeitschrift fir Saugetierkunde 26(2): 77–107

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rausch. 1969. Morphogenesis and age-related structure of permanent canine teeth in the brown bear,Ursus arctos L., in Arctic Alaska. Zeitschrift fur Morphologie der Tiere 66(2): 167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sauer, Peggy R. 1966. Determining sex of black bears from the size of the lower canine tooth. New York Fish and Game J. 13(2): 140–145

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhaowen, J., Hong, Z., Yuxi, W. et al. Separating brown and black bears in northeast China using tooth measurements. J. Northeast For. Univ. 6, 58–60 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02875278

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02875278

Key words

Navigation