Skip to main content
Log in

Microscopic views of simple macroscopic quantum behaviour

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)

Summary

For simple-model microscopic systems, we discuss whether (or not) potentially observable macroscopic quantum behaviour can arise, making explicit two criteria which must be satisfied for this to be possible. We also consider the relevance of this for macroscopic quantum behaviour in real systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. P. Feynman:Prog. Low Temp. Phys.,1, 17 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. E. Peierls:Surprises in Theoretical Physics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1979), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Carruthers andM. M. Nieto:Rev. Mod. Phys.,40, 411 (1968).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. B. D. Josephson:Phys. Lett,1, 251 (1962).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. For current reviews of superconducting weak-link phenomena see ref. [6-8].

  6. A.Widom, Y. Srivastava:Phys. Rep.,148, 1 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. T. D. Clark:Macroscopic quantum objects, inQuantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm edited byB. J. Hiley andF. D. Peat (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. P. Spiller, T. D. Clark, R. J. Prance andA. Widom:Quantum Phenomena in Circuits at Low Temperatures, inProg. Low Temp. Phys., edited byD. F. Brewer, vol.13 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.g., ref.[6] contains examples ofΦ(h/2e) periodic external-flux bands obtained from solving the analogous problem for a superconducting weak-link ring.

  10. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley:Comments on Quantum Interference in Macroscopic Systems, Birkbeck College Preprint.

  11. E.g., R. P. Feynman:Statistical Mechanics: A set of Lectures (Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1972), p. 330.

  12. E.g.,D. R. Tilley andJ. Tilley:Superfluidity and Superconductivity, 2nd edition (Adam Hilger, Bristol and Boston, 1986), Chapt. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Such a Hamiltonian has been proposed directly in a purely macroscopic appraoch to quantum fluid rotation.A. Widom:Phys. Lett. A,127, 102 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. We should point out that a contrasting macroscopic approach to superfluidity exists, in which the quantum analogues of the macroscopic classical hydrodynamic equations are used,L. D. Landau:J. Phys. (Moscow),11, 91 (1941); reprinted in I. M. Khalatnikov:Introduction to the Theory of Superfluidity (Benjamin, New York, N.Y., 1965), p. 185. See ref. [12] for a recent treatment and bibliography.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Such behaviour has long been known. For a different approach see,M. Schick andP. R. Zilsel:J. Low Temp. Phys.,1, 385 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E.g. M. Tinkham:Introduction to Supercoductivity (McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd., 1975). Chapter 2 deals with the BCS theory, and contains references to all the original papers.

  17. We should point out that the equivalence between external rotation and external magnetic flux is not simply a theoretical tool. Mechanical rotation has actually been employed in experiments to effectively flux bias SQUID magnetometers. SeeJ. E. Zimmermann andJ. E. Mercereau:Phys. Rev. Lett.,14, 887 (1965).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Such a Hamiltonian has been used in a purely macroscopic treatment of a superconducting weak-link ring. See, for example, ref. [5,6].

  19. HR eff is the effective Hamiltonian for the circuit viewed in the magnetic picture. For discussion of this in relation to the more familiar electric picture, see ref. [20].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. T. P. Spiller, T. D. Clark, R. J. Prance, H. Prance andD. A. Poulton:Nuovo Cimento B,105, 43 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. T. P. Spiller, T. D. Clark, R. J. Prance, H. Prance andD. A. Poulton:Int. J. Mod. Phys. B,4, 1423 (1990).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Born andV. A. Fock:Z. Phys.,51, 165 (1928).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. E.g.,A. Messiah:Quantum Mechanics, Vol. II (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1961), p. 747.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. O. Caldeira andA. J. Leggett:Phys. Rev. Lett.,46, 211 (1981).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. O. Caldeira andA. J. Leggett:Ann. Phys.,149, 374 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. J. Leggett: inProceedings of the NATO ASI Conference on Percolation, Localization and Superconductivity (Pergamon, Oxford, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. J. Leggett: inProceedings of the International Symposium, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd., Kokubunji, Tokio, Japan, August 29–31, 1983, edited byS. Kamefuchi et al. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1983), pp. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. J. Prance, J. E. Mutton, H. Prance, T. D. Clark, A. Widom andG. Megaloudis:Helv. Phys. Acta,56, 789 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. E. Mutton, R. J. Prance andT. D. Clark:Phys. Lett. A,104, 375 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Prance, T. P. Spiller, J. E. Mutton, R. J. Prance, T. D. Clark andR. Nest:Phys. Lett. A,115, 125 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. R. J. Prance, T. P. Spiller, H. Prance, T. D. Clark, J. F. Ralph, A. J. Clippingdale, Y. Srivastava andA. Widom:Nuovo Cimento B,106, 431 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. C. D. Tesche:Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci,480, 36 (1986).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. C. D. Tesche: inMacroscopic Quantum Phenomena, edited byT. D. Clark, H. Prance, R. J. Prance andT. P. Spiller (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), pp. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  34. E.g. ref.[16], p. 6.

  35. W. A. Little andR. D. Parks:Phys. Rev. Lett.,9, 9 (1962);Phys. Rev. A,133, 97 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. E.g. ref.[16], p. 21.

  37. Y. Aharonov andD. Bohm:Phys. Rev.,115, 485 (1959);123, 1511 (1961);130, 1625 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. W. F. Vinen:Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A,260, 218 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Varoquaux, O. Avenel andM. W. Meisel:Can. J. Phys.,65, 1377 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. O. Avenel andE. Varoquaux:Phys. Rev. Lett.,60, 416 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author of this paper has agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiller, T.P., Clark, T.D., Poulton, D.A. et al. Microscopic views of simple macroscopic quantum behaviour. Nuov Cim B 108, 135–149 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02874406

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02874406

PACS

Navigation