Quantitative variation in the chemical constituents of marihuana from stands of naturalizedCannabis sativa L. in East-Central Illinois

Conclusions

Data from 101 naturalized stands ofCannabis in east-central Illinois indicate that production of Δ1(6)-THC, Δ1-THC, cannabinol and cannabidiol was determined, to a large extent, by environmental conditions of the site where plants are grown. It is assumed that these stands represented a relatively homogeneous genetic population. Δ1-THC was under the strongest environmental control. In general, content of these compounds was higher in marihuana from stands where plants were stressed. Two types of stress were suggested by the data: nutrient deficiency and inadequate moisture. Competition from other plants enhanced the content of the drug compounds, and this relationship strengthens the stress hypothesis. Work is underway to confirm this relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.

    Adams, Roger 1940. Marihuana. Science92(2380): 115–119.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Agurell, Stig 1970. Constituents of male and femaleCannabis.In: The Botany and Chemistry of Cannabis, J. & A Churchill, London, pp. 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Boyce, S. S. 1900. Hemp. Orang Judd Co. New York. 112 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bouyoucos, G. J. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analyses of soils. Agron Jour.43: 434–438.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brown, I. C. 1943. A rapid method of determining exchangeable bases of soils, Soil Sci.56: 353–357.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    de Schweinitz, Lewis D. 1836. Remarks on the plants of Europe which have become naturalized in a more or less degree, in the United States. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. N.Y.3: 148–155.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dewey, Lyster H. 1913. Hemp.In: Yearbook, U.S. Dept. Agric. pp. 283–346.

  8. 8.

    - 1931. Hemp fiber losing ground despite its valuable qualities.In: Yearbook, U.S. Dept. Agric. pp. 285–287.

  9. 9.

    Gaoni, Y. & R. Mechoulam 1964. Isolation, structure, and partial synthesis of an active constituent of hashish. Jour. Amer. Chem. Soc.86: 1646–1647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Greweling, Thomas & Michael Peech 1965. Chemical Soil Tests. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 960.

  11. 11.

    Grinspoon, Lester 1969. Marihuana. Scientific American.221 (6): 17–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Haney, Alan & Fakhri A. Bazzaz 1970. Some ecological implications of the distribution of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in the United States of America.In: The Botany and Chemistry of Cannabis, J. & A. Churchill, London. pp. 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Harmon, Harry 1960. Modern Factor Analysis. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 154–191.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Krejci, Zdenek 1970. Changes with maturation in the amounts of biologically interesting substances ofCannabis.In: The Botany and Chemistry ofCannabis, J. & A. Churchill London. pp. 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mechoulam, Raphael 1970. Marihuana chemistry. Science168(3936): 1159–1166.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Richards, L. A. (Ed.) 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. U.S. Dept. Agric. Handbook 60. 160 pp.

  17. 17.

    Schultes, Richard E. 1970. Random thoughts and queries on the botany ofCannabis.In: The Botany and Chemistry ofCannabis. J. & A. Churchill, London, pp. 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Walton, R. P. 1938. Marihuana-America’s New Drug Problem. J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Chemical analyses of marihuana samples were provided by the National Institute of Mental Health

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haney, A., Kutscheid, B.B. Quantitative variation in the chemical constituents of marihuana from stands of naturalizedCannabis sativa L. in East-Central Illinois. Econ Bot 27, 193–203 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872989

Download citation

Keywords

  • Economic Botany
  • Hemp
  • Female Plant
  • Cannabidiol
  • Cannabis Sativa