Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 167–176 | Cite as

A review of soil erodibility in water and wind erosion research

  • Song Yang 
  • Liu Lianyou 
  • Yan Ping 
  • Cao Tong 
Ecological Environment


Soil erodibility is an important index to evaluate the soil sensitivity to erosion. The research on soil erodibility is a crucial tache in understanding the mechanism of soil erosion. Soil erodibility can be evaluated by measuring soil physiochemical properties, scouring experiment, simulated rainfall experiment, plot experiment and wind tunnel experiment. We can use soil erosion model and nomogram to calculate soil erodibility. Many soil erodibility indices and formulae have been put forward. Soil erodibility is a complex concept, it is influenced by many factors, such as soil properties and human activities. Several obstacles restrict the research of soil erodibility. Firstly, the research on soil erodibility is mainly focused on farmland; Secondly, soil erodibility in different areas cannot be compared sufficiently; and thirdly, the research on soil erodibility in water-wind erosion is very scarce. In the prospective research, we should improve method to measure and calculate soil erodibility, strengthen the research on the mechanism of soil erodibility, and conduct research on soil erodibility by both water and wind agents.

Key words

soil erosion soil erodibility measurement calculation mechanism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amezketa E, Singer M J, 1996. Testing a new procedure for measuring water-stable aggregation.Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 60: 888–894.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson H W, 1954. Suspended sediment discharge as related to stream flow, topography, soil and land used.American Geophysical Union, 35: 268–281.Google Scholar
  3. Bajracharya R M, R Lal, 1992. Seasonal soil loss and erodibility variation on A miamian silt loam soil.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56: 1560–1565.Google Scholar
  4. Baver L D, 1933. Some factors effecting erosion.Agri. Eng., 14: 51–52.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett H H, 1926. Some comparisons of the properties of humid tropical and humid temperate American soils: with special reference to indicated relationships between chemical composition and physical properties.Soil Sci., 21: 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouyoucos G J, 1935. The clay ratio as a criterion of the susceptibility of soils to erosion.J. Am. Soc. Agron., 27: 738–741.Google Scholar
  7. Bu Zhaohong, Li Quanying, 1994. Preliminary study on the method of soil erodibility mapping.Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 9(4): 22–27. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Cai Chongfa, Ding Shuwen, 2000. Study of applying USLE and Geographical Information System IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 14(2): 19–24. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Chen Hongsong, Shao Mingan, 2000. Application of fine sediment flocculation and deflocculation in soil and water conservation.Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 19(4): 13–16. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Chen Minghua, Zhou Fujian, Lin Fuxing, 1995. Study on the soil erodibility factor.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 9(1): 19–24. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Chepil W S, 1942. Relation of wind erosion to water stable and dry clod structure of soil.Soil Sci., 55: 275–287.Google Scholar
  12. Chepil W S, 1950. Properties of soil which influence wind erosion: II. dry aggregate structure as an index of erodibility.Soil Science, 69: 403–414.Google Scholar
  13. Chepil W S, 1951a. Properties of soil which influence wind erosion: V. mechanical stability of structure.Soil Science, 72: 465–478.Google Scholar
  14. Chepil W S, 1951b. Properties of soil which influence wind erosion: III. the effect of apparent density and erodibility.Soil Science, 71: 141–153.Google Scholar
  15. Chepil W S, 1952. Factors that influence clod structure and erodibility of soil by wind: I. soil structure.Soil Science, 75: 473–483.Google Scholar
  16. Chepil W S, 1954. Factors that influence clod structure and erodibility of soil by wind: III. calcium carbonate and decomposed organic material.Soil Science, 77: 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chepil W S, 1955. Factors that influence clod structure and erodibility of soil by wind: IV. sand, silt and clay.Soil Science, 80: 155–162.Google Scholar
  18. Chepil W S, Woodruff N P, 1963. The physics of wind erosion and its control.Adv. Agron., 15: 211–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. David D Breshears, Jeffrey J Whicker, Mathew P Johansenet al., 2003. Wind and water erosion and transport in semi-arid shrubland, grassland and forest ecosystems: quantifying dominance of horizontal wind-driven transport.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28: 1189–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Leenheer L, De Boodt M, 1954. Determination of aggregate stability by the change in weight-diameter.Mededelingen Ran de Land-bouwhoge School, 24: 290–351.Google Scholar
  21. Dong Zhibao, Li Zhenshan, 1998. Wind erodibility of aeolian sand as influenced by grain-size parameters.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 4(4): 1–12. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Dusan Zachar, 1982. Soil Erosion. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co., 164–166.Google Scholar
  23. El-Swaify S A, Dangler E W, 1976. Erodibilities of selected tropical soils in relation to structural and hydrologic parameters. In: Foster G R (ed.), Soil Erosion Prediction and Control. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA, USA, 105–114.Google Scholar
  24. Ellison W D, 1947. Soil erosion studies: Part I.Agricultural Engineering, 28: 145–146.Google Scholar
  25. Ekwue E I, 1992. Effect of organic and fertilizer treatments on soil physical properties and erodibility.Soil and Tillage Research, 22(3–4): 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farres P J, Cousen S M, 1985. An improved method of aggregate stability measurement.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 10: 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fryrear D W, Krammes C A, 1994. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soil.Soil and Water Conservation, 49(2): 183–188.Google Scholar
  28. Fryrear D W, A Saleh, Bilbro J D,et al., 1998a. Revised Wind Erosion Equation (RWEQ). Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research Unit. USDA-ARS, Southern Plains Area Cropping Systems Research Laboratory. Technical Bulletin No.1.Google Scholar
  29. Giovannini G, Vallejo R, Lucchesi S, 2001. Effects of land use and eventual fire on soil erodibility in dry Mediterranean conditions.Forest Ecology and Management, 147(1): 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gussak V B, 1946. A device for the rapid determination of erodibility of soils and some results of its application.Abstract in Soil and Fertilizers, 10.Google Scholar
  31. Hagen L J, Wagner L E, Tatarko Jet al., 1995. Wind Erosion Prediction System: technical description. In: Proceedings of WEPP/WEPS Symposium, August 9–11, Des Moines, IA, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA.Google Scholar
  32. Jiang Dingsheng, Li Xinhua, Fan Xingkeet al., 1995. Discussion on soil anti-scouring properties and arrangement of soil and water conservation measure system in the contiguous areas of Shanxi, Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 9(1): 1–7. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Juergen Bohnera, Schafer W, Conrad O, 2003. The WEELS model: methods, results and limitations.Catena, 52: 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lal R, 1990. Soil Erosion in the Tropics: Principles and Management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 23.Google Scholar
  35. Lal R, 2001. Soil degradation by erosion.Land Degradation & Development, 16: 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu Baoyuan, Zhang Keli, Jiao Juying, 1999. Soil erodibility and its use in soil erosion prediction model.Journal of Natural Resources, 14(4): 345–350. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Liu Lianyou, Wang Jianhua, Li Xiaoyanet al., 1998. Determination of the erodible particles on cultivated soils by wind tunnel simulation.Chinese Science Bulletin, 43(15): 1663–1666. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Middleton H E, 1930. Properties of soils which influence soil erosion.U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech., 178.Google Scholar
  39. Morgan R P C, 1995. Soil Erosion and Conservation. Essex, England: Longman, 3.Google Scholar
  40. Nearing M A, Foster G R, Lane L Jet al., 1989. A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project Technology.Transactions of the ASAE, 32(5): 1587–1593.Google Scholar
  41. Nikolaus J Kuhn, Rorke B Bryan, 2004. Drying, soil surface condition and interrill erosion on two Ontario soils.Catena, 57(2): 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olson T C, Wischmeier W H, 1963. Soil erodibility evaluations for soils on the runoff and erosion stations.Soil Science, 27: 590–592.Google Scholar
  43. Peel T C, 1937. The relation of certain physical characteristics to the erodibility of soils.Soil Science Society Proceedings, 2: 79–84.Google Scholar
  44. Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G Aet al., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Handbook No.703. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  45. Roose E J, 1977. Application of the universal soil loss equation of Wischmeier and Smith in West Africa. In: Greenland J, Lal R (eds.), Conservation and Soil Management in the Humid Tropics. Chichester, England, Wiley: 177–187.Google Scholar
  46. Rorke B Bryan, 2000. Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope.Geomorphology, 32: 385–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shiriza M A, 1984. A unifying quantitative analysis of soil texture.Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48: 142–147.Google Scholar
  48. Skidmore E L, Powers D H, 1982. Dry soil-aggregate stability: energy-based index.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46: 1274–1279.Google Scholar
  49. Skidmore E L, 1994. Wind erosion. In: Lal R (ed.), Soil Erosion Research Methods. Del Ray Beach, FL: St. Lccie Press, 265–293.Google Scholar
  50. Subhash Chandler S K De, 1978. A simple laboratory apparatus to measure relative erodibility of soil.Soil Science, 125(2): 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tan Guoxin, Ryosuke Shibasaki, 2003. Global estimation of crop productivity and the impacts of global warming by GIS and EPIC integration.Ecological Modelling, 168: 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tang Keli, 1964. Erodibility of chemozem and spodosols and its improvement. In: Symposium of Student Abroad. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  53. Tian Jiaying, Huang Yiduan, 1964. Investigation on physical resistance of soil in relation to the index of soil resistance to erosion in the region of Ziwuling, Gansu.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 12(3): 286–296. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  54. USDA-Agricultural Research Service, 1961. A universal equation for measuring wind erosion. USDA-ARS, 22–69.Google Scholar
  55. Van Pelt R S, Ted M Zobeck, 2004. Validation of the wind erosion stochastic simulator (WESS) and the revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ) for single events.Environmental Modelling & Software, 19: 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Pelt R S, Ted M Zobeck, 2004. Validation of the Wind Erosion Equation (WEQ) for discrete periods.Environmental Modelling & Software, 19: 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang Xiaodan, Zhong Xianghao, Wang Jianping, 2004. Preliminary study on the soil erodibility and its spatial distribution on the Tibetan Plateau.Arid Land Geography, 27(3): 343–346. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  58. Williams J R, Jones C A, Dyke P T, 1984. A modeling approach to determine the relationship between erosion and soil productivity.Transactions of the ASAE, 27(1): 129–144.Google Scholar
  59. Wischmeier W H, Smith D D, 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses. Agricultural Handbook 537. USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  60. Woodburn R, Kozachyn J, 1956. A study of relative erodibility of a group of Mississippi gully soils.Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 37: 749–753.Google Scholar
  61. Woodruff N P, Siddoway F H, 1965. A wind erosion equation.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 29(5): 602–608.Google Scholar
  62. Xing Tingyan, Shi Xuezheng, Yu Dongsheng, 1998. Comparison of soil erodibility factor K measured by field plots under rainfall simulator and natural rainfall.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 35(3): 296–302. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  63. Yakupof T, 1955. Wind Erosion and Its Prevention. Beijing: China Financial and Economic Publishing House, 15–16. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  64. Yang Yusheng, 1992. A study on the erodibility of purplish soil under different land use forms.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 6(3): 52–58. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  65. Young R A, Mutchler C K, 1977. Erodibility of some Minnesota soil.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 32: 180–182.Google Scholar
  66. Yu Dongsheng, Shi Xuezheng, 2000. Quantificational relationship between soil permeability of upland and soil erodibility in hilly red soil region.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 37(3): 316–322. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  67. Zhang Aiguo, Li Rui, Yang Qinke, 2002. The mathematical models on soil factor of water and soil loss in China.Journal of Mountain Science, 20(3): 284–289. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  68. Zhang Keli, Cai Yongming, Liu Baoyuanet al., 2001. Evaluation of soil erodibility on the Loess Plateau.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(10): 1687–1695. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  69. Zhou Peihua, Wu Chunlong, 1993. The research method of soil anti-scourability experiment on the Loess Plateau.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 7(1): 29–34. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  70. Zhu Xianmo, 1954. Soil erosion and its evolution in Jinghe watershed.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2(4): 209–222. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  71. Zhu Xianmo, 1956. Classification on the soil erosion in the loess region.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 4(2): 99–115. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  72. Zhu Xianmo, 1960. Impact of vegetation on water and soil loss in loess area.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 8(2): 110–121. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  73. Zobeck T M, 1991. Soil properties affecting wind erosion.J. Soil Water Conserv., 46: 112–118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Song Yang 
    • 1
  • Liu Lianyou 
    • 1
  • Yan Ping 
    • 1
  • Cao Tong 
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Resources Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, the Ministry of Education of ChinaBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations