Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent advances in the study of chromosome structure

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abraham, A. 1939. Chromosome structure and the mechanics of mitosis and meiosis. Ann. Bot.3: 546–568.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albuquerque, R. A., andJ. A. Serra. 1951. Nucleolar composition and nucleolar zones of the chromosomes. Port. Acta Biol.3: 187–193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alloway, J. L. 1933. Further observations on the use ofPneumococcus extracts in effecting transformation of typein vitro. Jour. Exp. Med.75: 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amano, S., S. Dohy, H. Tanaka, F. Uchino, andM. Hanaoka. 1956. The structure of the nucleus studied by electron microscopy in ultra thin section with special reference to chromonema. Cytologia.21: 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrose, E. J. 1955. Bot. Soc. Chim. Biol.37: 1263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. ————— 1956. The structure of chromosomes. Progr. Biophys. & Biophys. Chem.6: 26–65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ————— andA. R. Gopal-Ayyengar. 1952. Molecular orientation and chromosome breakage. Heredity.6 (Suppl.): 277–291.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Astbury, W. T. 1951. X-ray studies of nucleic acids. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., Vol.1 (Nucleic acid): 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ————— andF. O. Bell. 1938. Some recent developments in the X-ray study of proteins and related structures. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.6: 109–121.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Avery, O. T., C. M. Macleod andM. McCarty. 1944. Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal types. Jour. Exp. Med.79: 137–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barigozzi, C. 1954. The structure of the resting nucleus. Symp. fine structure of cells. VIII Congr. Cell Biol. 110–120.

  12. Belling, J. 1928. The ultimate chromomeres ofLilium andAloe with regard to the number of genes. Univ. Calif., Publ. Bot.14: 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berger, C. A. 1944. The cytological effects of benzene vapour. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club.71: 620–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernstein, H. H., andD. Mazia. 1953a. Biochem. et. Biophys. Acta.10: 600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. ————— and —————. 1953b. The desoxyribonucleoprotein of sea urchin sperm. Biochem. etc. Biophys. Acta.11: 59–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhaduri, P. N. 1942. Cytological analysis of structural hybridity inRhoeo discolor. Hance Jour. Genet.44: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ————— andA. K. Kar. 1948. Study of chromosome-nucleolus relationship and its bearing on the interpretation ofOenothera cytogenetics. Bull. Bot. Soc. Beng.2: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ————— andP. N. Ghosh. 1954. Chromosomal biotypes in emmer wheat. Nature.174: 934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhattacharjee, D., andA. K. Sharma. 1951. Phosphatase in mitotic and meiotic cycle of plant chromosomes. Sci. & Cult.17: 268–269.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boivin, A., R. Vendrely andC. Vendrely. 1948. L’acide désoxyribonucléique du noyan cellulaire dépositaire des caracteres héréditaires arguments d’ordre analytique. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]226: 1061–1063.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bose, S. 1956. Aberrations in the nucleolar chromosome of inbred rye. Hereditas.42: 263–292.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brachet, J. 1940. La localisation de l’acidethymonucleique pendent l’oogénèse et la maturation chez les amphibiens. Arch. Biol.51: 151–165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. ————— andJ. R. Shaver. 1948. The effect of nucleases on cytochemical reactions for aminoacids and staining with acid dyes. Stain Tech.23: 177–189.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bussi, L. 1953. Alcuni problemi di struttura del nucleo di cellule ematiche. Relax. XI Congr. Naz Soc. Ital. Ematol. [Maggio].

  25. Camara, A. 1951. Progresses no estude do centromero. Broteria.20: 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Carothers, E. E. 1936. Components of the mitotic spindle with special reference to the chromosomal and interzonal fibers in the Acrididae. Biol. Bull.71: 469–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Caspersson, T. 1940. Methods for the determination of the absorption spectrum of the cell structure. Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc.60: 8–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. ————— 1947. The relations between nucleic acid and protein synthesis. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., Vol.1 (nucleic acid): 127–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Castro, D. de. 1950. Notes on two cytological problems of the genusLuzula D. C. Genet. Iber.2: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. —————,A. Camara andN. Malheiros. 1949. X-rays in the centromere problem ofLuzula purpurea Link. Genet. Iber.1: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chakravorti, A. K. 1951. Origin of cultivated bananas of south-east Asia. Indian Jour. Genet. & Plant Breed.11: 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chargaff, E. 1950. Chemical specificity of nucleic acids and mechanism of their enzymatic degradation. Experientia.6: 201–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cleveland, L. R. 1949. The whole life cycle of chromosomes and their coiling systems. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc.39: 1–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Coleman, L. C. 1940. The structure of homotypic and somatic chromosomes. Amer. Jour. Bot.27: 683–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Colombo, G. 1955. Experientia.11: 333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Daly, M. M., A. E. Mirsky andH. Ris. 1951. [Unpublished observations reported by Mirsky]. Genetics in the 20th Century. [p. 137].

  37. D’Angelo, E.G. 1946. Micrurgical studies onChironomas salivary gland. Biol. Bull.90: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Danielli, J. F. 1953. Cytochemistry—a critical approach.

  39. Darlington, C. D. 1939. Misdivision and the genetics of the centromere. Jour. Genet.37: 341–365.

    Google Scholar 

  40. ————— 1942. Chromosome chemistry and gene action. Nature.149: 66–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. ————— 1947. Nucleic acid and the chromosomes. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., Vol.1 (Nucleic acid): 252–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. -----. 19. Recent advances in cytology.

  43. ————— andL. F. La Cour. 1940. Nucleic acid starvation of chromosomes inTrillium. Jour. Genet.40: 185–215.

    Google Scholar 

  44. ————— and —————. 1946. Nucleic acid and the beginning of meiosis. Nature.157: 875–876.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Davidson, J. N. 1953. The biochemistry of the nucleic acids.

  46. Davies, D. R. 1956. The structure of the centromere in relation to metabolic activity. Chromosoma.8: 221–228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Dawson, M. H., andR. H. P. Sia, 1931. A technique for inducing transformation of pneumococcal typesin vitro. Jour. Exp. Med.54: 681–699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ellerstrom, S., and J. H. Tjio, 1950. Note on the chromosomes ofPhleum echinatum. Bot. Not.4: 443–465.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Erickson, R. O., K. B. Sax andM. Ogur. 1949. Perchloric acid in the cytochemistry of pentose nucleic acid. Science.110: 472–473.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Fernandes, A. 1951. Sur l’heterochromatinisation des chromosomes nucléolaires. Bl. Soc. Brot. II.25: 249–278.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Feulgen, R., andH. Rossenbeck. 1924. Mikrokopischchemischer Nachweis einer Nucleinsaure. Zeits. Phys. Chem.135: 203–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Fraenkel-Conrat, H. 1956. Sci. Amer. 194, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  53. ————— andR. C. Williams. 1955. Reconstitution of active tobacco mosaic virus from its inactive protein and nucleic acid components. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. [U. S.]41: 690–698.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Frey-Wyssling, A. 1948. Sub-microscopic morphology of protoplasm and its derivatives.

  55. Fredrich-Freska, H., andF. Kaudewitz 1953. Letale Spatfolgen nach Einban von P32 inAmoeba proteus und ihre Deutung durch genetische Untereinheiten. Zeits. Naturf.85: 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Furberg, S. 1950. An X-ray study of the stereochemistry of the nucleosides. Acta. Chem. Scand.4: 751–761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gall, J. G. 1954. Lampbrush chromosomes from oocyte nuclei of the newt. Morphologia.94: 283–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. ————— 1956. Biophys. & Biochem. Cytol.2 (Suppl.): 393.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Gates, R. R. 1938. The structure of the chromosome. Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc.58: 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  60. ————— 1942. Nucleoli and related nucleolar structures. Bot. Rev.8: 337–409.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gay, H. 1956. Chromosome-nuclear membrane-cytoplasmic interrelations in Drosophila. Biophys. & Biochem. Cytol.2 (4): 407–414.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Godward, M. B. E. 1950. Somatic chromosomes of Conjugales. Nature.165: 653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Gomori, G. 1939. Microchemical demonstration of phosphatase in tissue section. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Sc. & Med.42: 23–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Griffith, F. 1928. The significance of pneumococcal types. Jour. Hyg.27: 113–159.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Gulick, A. 1941. The chemistry of the chromosomes. Bot. Rev.7: 433–457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Hannah, A. 1951. Localization and function of heterochromatin inDrosophila melanogaster. Adv. Genet.4: 87–125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hart, R. G. 1955. Electron microscopic evidence for the localisation of ribo-nucleic acid in the particles of tobacco mosaic virus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. [U. S.]41: 261–264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Heilborn, O. 1940. Further contributions to a chromomere analysis ofLilium. Hereditas.26: 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Heitz, E. 1931. Die Ursache der gesatzmassigen Zahl, Lage, Form und Grösse pflanzicher Nucleolen. Planta.12: 775–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Henke, K., andH. J. Pohley. 1952. Differentielle Zellteilungen und Polyploidie bei der Schuppenbildung der Mehlmotte,Ephestia Kuhniella. Zeits. Naturf.7b: 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hughes-Schrader, S., andH. Ris. 1941. The diffuse spindle attachment of coccids, verified by the mitotic behaviour of induced chromosome fragments. Jour. Exp. Zool.87: 429–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Huskins, C. L., andS. G. Smith. 1935. Meiotic chromosome structure inTrillium erectum. Ann. Bot.49: 119–150.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Jacobson, W., andM. Webb. 1950. The two types of nucleic acid during mitosis. Jour. Physiol.112.

  74. Katterman, G. 1939. Ein neuer Karyotyp bei Roggen. Chromosoma.1: 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kaufmann, B. P. 1942. Reversion from roughest to wild type inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics.27: 537–549.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. ————— 1948. Chromosome structure in relation to the chromosome cycle. II. Bot. Rev.14: 57–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. ————— 1952a. Cytochemical studies of the action of trypsin. I. Digestion of salivary gland chromosome. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. [Wash.]38: 464–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. ————— 1952b. Cytochemical studies of the action of trypsin. III. The cause of deformation of salivary gland chromosome. Exp. Cell Res.4: 408–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. ————— 1954. Chromosome aberrations induced in animal cells by ionizing radiations. Rad. Biol.1 (2): 627–711.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. ————— 1957. A portrait of the chromosome. Bios.28: (1): 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  81. ----- et al. 1947–52. Organization of the chromosome. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Year Book.

  82. ————— andM. R. McDonald. 1950. Localization of cellular proteins by enzymatic hydrolysis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.14: 85–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. —————, ————— and ————— andM. R. McDonald. 1951. Enzymatic degradaiton of ribonucleoproteins. Amer. Jour. Bot.38: 268–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. ————— andD. De. 1956. Fine structure of the chromosomes. Jour. Biophys. & Biochem. Cytol. (Suppl.)2 (4): 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  85. ----- andM. R. McDonald. 1957. Organization of the chromosome. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.21: [In press].

  86. Keeffe, Mary M. 1948. A reinvestigation of chromosome coiling inTrillium. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 434–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. King, G. C. 1953. Diffuse centromere and other cytological observations on two desmids. Nature.171: 181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Kinosito, R., andS. Ohno. 1956. Chromosomes in interphase nuclei. Cytologia.21: 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Klingstedt, H. 1941. Negative heterochromacy in Orthopteran chromosomes. Mem. Soc. Faun. Flor. Fenn.17: 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Kostoff, D. 1939. Further studies upon the chromosome structure and behaviour. La Cellule.48: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kurnick, N. B. 1950. Methyl green pyronin. I. Basis of selective staining of nucleic acids. Jour. Gen. Physiol.33: 243–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. ————— 1952. Histological staining with methyl green pyronin. Stain Techn.27: 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Kuwada, Y. 1939. Chromosome structure—a critical review. Cytologia.10: 213–256.

    Google Scholar 

  94. La Cour, L. F. 1953. The Luzula system analysed by X-rays. Symposium on chromosome breakage. Heredity.6 (Suppl.): 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  95. LaFontaine, J., andH. Ris. 1955. A study of the lampbrush chromosomes with the electron microscope. Rec. Genet. Soc. Amer.24: 579–580.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Leuchtenberger, C. 1950. A cytochemical study of pycnotic nuclear degeneration. Chromosoma.3: 449–475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Levan, A. 1949. The influence on chromosomes and mitosis of chemicals as studied by theAllium cepa test. Proc. VIII. Int. Congr. Genet. Hereditas, Suppl. Vol: 325–337.

  98. Levene, P. A. andL. W. Bass. 1931. Nucleic acids.

  99. Lima-de Faria, A. 1949. The structure of the centromere of the chromosomes of rye. Hereditas.35: 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  100. ————— 1950. The Feulgen test applied to centromeric chromomeres. Hereditas.36: 60–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. ————— 1952. Chromosome analysis of the chromosome complement of rye. Chromosoma.5: 1–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. ————— 1953. The regions of special cycle of division. Chromosoma.6: 33–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Linnert, G. 1949. Untersuchungen über die Zytologie polyploider Pflanzen. II. Chromosoma.3: 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. ————— 1955. Die Struktur der pachytan Chromosomen in Euchromatin und Heterochromatin und ihre Auswirkung auf die Chiasmalbildung beiSalvia-Arten. Chromosoma.7: 90–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Longley, A. E. 1939. Knob positions on corn chromosomes. Jour. Agr. Res.59: 475–490.

    Google Scholar 

  106. ————— 1941. Knob positions on teosinte chromosomes. Jour. Agr. Res.62: 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Love, R. M. 1943. A cytogenetic study of types in a winter wheat. Canad. Jour. Res.21: 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Lowman, F. G. 1956. Electron microscope studies onDrosophila salivary gland chromosomes. Chromosoma.8: 30–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Makino, S., andE. Momma. 1950. Observations on the structure of grasshopper chromosomes subjected to a new acetocarmine treatment. Jour. Morph.86: 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Malheiros, N. D., D. Castro andA. Camara. 1947. Cromosomas semcentromero localizado o casa deLuzula purpurea Link. Agron. Lusit.9: 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Malheiros-Garde, N., andA. Garde. 1950. Fragmentation as a possible evolutionary process in the genusLuzula D. C. Genet. Iber.2: 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Manton, I. 1942. Demonstration of the telophase split inTodea. Nature.150: 547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. ————— 1945. New evidence of the telophase split inTodea barbara. Amer. Jour. Bot.32: 342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. ————— 1950. The spiral structure of chromosomes. Biol. Rev.25: 486–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Marquardt, H. 1941. Untersuchungen über den Formwechsel der Chromosomen in generativen Kern des Pollens und Pollensschlauchs vonAllium andLilium. Planta31: 670–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Mather, K. 1944. The genetical activity of heterochromatin. Proc. Roy Soc. London. B.132: 308–332.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Matsuura, H. 1941. Chromosome studies inTrillium kamtschaticum. Pall. III. Cytologia.8: 142–177.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Mazia, D. 1941. Enzyme studies on chromosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.9: 40–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. ————— 1949. News and notes (ACS at San Francisco) 115th meeting of the American Chemical Society. Science.109: 387–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. ————— 1950. Fiber protein structure in chromosomes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.50: 954–965.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. ————— 1954. The particulate organization of the chromosome. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. [Wash.]40: 521–527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. ————— andK. Yudowitch. 1947. Fiber structure in chromosome. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.12: 122–130.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. McCarty, M., andO. T. Avery. 1946. Chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pnuemococcal types. Jour. Exp. Med.83: 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  124. McClintock, B. 1934. The relation of a particular chromosomal element to the development of nucleoli inZea mays. Zeits. Zell. Mikr. Anat.21: 294–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. ————— 1944. The relation of homozygous deficiencies to mutations and allelic series in maize. Genetics.29: 478–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Melander, Y. 1950. Studies on the chromosomes ofUlophysema oresundense. Hereditas.36: 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Miescher, F. 1874. Die Spermatozoen einiger Wirbethiere. Vehr. Naturf. Ges. Basal.6: 138–208.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Mirsky, A. E. 1947. Chemical properties of isolated chromosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.12: 143–146.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. -----. 1951. Some chemical aspects of the cell nucleus.In: Genetics in the 20th Century. [p. 127–153].

  130. ————— andA. W. Pollister. 1946. Chromosin, desoxyribonucleoprotein of the cell nucleus. Jour. Gen. Physiol.30: 117–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. ————— andH. Ris. 1947. The chemical composition of isolated chromosomes. Jour. Gen. Physiol.13: 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. ————— and —————. 1949. Variable and constant components of chromosomes. Nature163: 666–667.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. ----- andN. B. Kurnick. 1951. [Unpublished observation reported by Mirsky] Genetics in the 20th Century. [p. 127–153].

  134. Momma, E. 1952. Further observations on the inner structure of the X-chromosome ofPodisma sapporense (Orthoptera). Cytologia17: 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Nebel, B. R. 1939. Chromosome structure. Bot. Rev.5: 563–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Nordenskiold, H. 1951. Cytotaxonomical studies in the genusLuzula. I. Hereditas37: 325–355.

    Google Scholar 

  137. ————— 1957. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genusLuzula. II. Hereditas42: 7–73.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Oksala, T. 1945. Zytologischen Studien on Odonaten. I. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn.4: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Östergren, G. 1947. Proximal heterochromatin structure of the centromere and the mechanism of its misdivision. Bot. Not.2: 176–177.

    Google Scholar 

  140. —————, andR. Prakken, 1946. Behaviour of the spindle of the actively mobile chromosome ends of rye. Hereditas.32: 473–494.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Pfeiffer, H. H. 1940. Mikrurgische Versuche in polarisierten Lichte zur Analyse des Feinbaues der Riesenchromosomen vonChironomus. Chromosoma.1: 526–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Piza, S. de T. 1950. The present status of the question of the kinetochore. Genet. Iber.2: 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Polli, E. E. 1953. New evidence of spiralized structure of resting chromosomes (isolated human chromosomes). Biochem. et Biophys. Acta10: 215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Pollister, A. W., andH. Ris. 1947. Nucleoprotein determination in cytological preparations. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.12: 147–157.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Pontecorvo, G. 1954. Structure of heterochromatin. Nature153: 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Prakken, R., andA. Muntzing. 1942. A meiotic peculiarity in rye, simulating a terminal kinetochore. Hereditas28: 441–482.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Rattenbury, J. A., andJ. A. Serra. 1952. Types of nucleolus reconstitution in telophase and the question of the ‘nucleolar organiser.’ Port. Acta. Biol.3: 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Resende, F. 1939. Structure of chromosomes as observed in root-tips. Nature144: 481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. ————— 1940. Über die Chromosomenstruktur in der Mitose der Wurzelspitzen. II. Sat-differenzierungen Spiralbau und Chromonemata. Chromosoma8: 486–520.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Rhoades, M. M. 1940. Studies of a telocentric chromosome in maize with reference to stability of its centromere. Genetics.25: 483–521.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. ————— andH. Vilkomersen. 1942. On the anaphase movement of chromosomes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. [Wash.]28: 433–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. ————— andW. E. Kerr. 1949. A note on centromere organization. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. [Wash.]35: 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Ris, H. 1942. A cytological and experimental analysis of the meiotic behaviour of the univalent X chromosome in the bearberry aphidTamalia cowenii. Jour. Exp. Zool.90: 267–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. ————— 1945. The structure of meiotic chromosomes in the grasshopper and its bearing on the nature of chromomeres and lampbrush chromosomes. Biol. Bull.89: 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. ————— 1952. The submicroscopic structure of chromosomes. Genetics37: 619.

    Google Scholar 

  156. ————— 1954. Excerpta Medica8: 399.

    Google Scholar 

  157. -----. 1955a. Symposium on the fine structure of cells. 121 pp.

  158. -----. 1955b. Cell-division—an analysis of development.In: B. A. Willier, P. A. Weiss and V. Hamburger [eds.] [p. 91–125].

  159. ————— 1956. A study of chromosomes with the electron microscope. Biophys. & Biochem. Cytol.2 (4): 385–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. -----. 1957. Chromosome structure.In: Symposium on chemical basis of heredity.

  161. ————— andA. E. Mirsky. 1949. Quantitative cytochemical determination of desoxyribonucleic acid with the Feulgen nucleal reaction. Jour. Gen. Physiol.33: 125–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Schneider, W. C. 1945. Extraction and estimation of desoxypentose nucleic acid and pentose nucleic acid. Jour. Biol. Chem.161: 293–303.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Schrader, F. 1939. The structure of the kinetochore at meiosis. Chromosoma1: 230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. ————— 1955. Notes on the mitotic behaviour of long chromosomes. Cytologia6: 422–431.

    Google Scholar 

  165. -----. 1951. A critique of the recent hypotheses of mitosis.In: Symposium on cytology [East Lansing, Michigan].

  166. -----. 1953. Mitosis (sec. ed.)

  167. Schramm, G., G. Schumaker andW. Zillig. 1955. Zeits. Naturf.10b: 481.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. Schultz, J. 1941. The evidence of the nucleoprotein nature of the gene. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.4: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  169. ————— 1944. The gene as a chemical unit.In: Alexander, J. [Ed.] Colloid Chemistry. Vol.5: 819–850.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. ————— 1947. The nature of heterochromatin. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.12: 179–191.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. ————— 1952. Interrelations between nucleous and cytoplasm problems at the biological level. Exp. Cell Res., Suppl.2: 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Serra, J. A. 1946. Histochemical tests for proteins and amino acids; the characterization of basic protein. Stain Techn.21: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  173. -----. 1949. A cytophysiological theory of the gene, gene mutation and position effect. Port. Acta Biol. Goldschmidt Mem. Vol: 401–562.

  174. Seshachar, B. R. 1952. The biological importance of the nucleic acids. Pres. Address. Proc. 39th Indian Sci. Congr. 1–20.

  175. ————— andE. W. Flick. 1949. Application of perchloric acid technique to Protozoa. Science110: 659.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. Sharma, A. K. 1947. A cytological investigation of incompatibility betweenCosmos bipinnatus Cav. andC. sulphureus Cav. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal1: 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  177. ————— 1950. Chromosome chemistry—and the recent techniques for its study. Sci. & Cult.16: 134–142.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. ————— 1951. Trichloracetic acid and Feulgen staining. Nature167: 441–442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. ————— 1952. Desoxyribonucleic acid—the problem of its function, location and reactions. Port. Acta Biol.3: 280–317.

    Google Scholar 

  180. ————— 1956a. A new concept of a means of speciation in plants. Caryologia9: 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  181. ————— 1956b. Fixation of plant chromosomes: its principles, limitations and recent developments. Bot. Rev.22: 665–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. ————— 1957. Chromosome studies in some Indian barley. I. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. & Ind.22: 246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  183. ————— andD. Bhattacharjee. 1952. Effect of trichloracetic acid on nuclear proteins. Nature169: 417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  184. —————, (Miss)A. Mookerjea and (Miss)C. Ghosh. 1953. Alkaline phosphatase technique in plant chromosomes. Port. Acta Biol.3: 341–354.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  185. ————— andA. Bal. 1953. Coumarin in chromosome analysis. Stain Techn.28: 255–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  186. ————— and (Miss)A. Mookerjea. 1955. Paradichlorobenzene and other chemicals in chromosome work. Stain Tech.30: 1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. ————— andR. N. Mukherji. 1956. Chromosome studies in some Indian barley. II. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.43: 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  188. ————— andM. Roy. 1956a. The acid phosphatase test in the analysis of chromosome structure. Φyton7: 23:36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. ————— and —————. 1956b. Irradiation—its effect on young metabolic nuclei and the biochemical changes involved. La Cellule57: 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  190. ————— and —————. 1956. Chemical constitution and enzyme activity of chromosomes and related structures. La Cellule.58: 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  191. Smith, S. G. 1952. The evolution of heterochromatin in the genusTribolium (Tenebrionidae: Coleoptera) Chromosoma.4: 385–610.

    Google Scholar 

  192. Sparrow, A. H. 1942. The structure and development of the chromosome spirals in microspores ofTrillium. Canad. Jour. Res.20: 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Stedman, E. andE. Stedman. 1943. Chromosomin, a protein constituent of chromosomes. Nature.152: 267–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. ————— and —————. 1944. Chromosomin and nucleic acid. Nature153: 500–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. ————— and —————. 1946. The function of desoxyribonucleic acid in the cell nucleus. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. Vol.1 (Nucleic acids): 232–251.

    Google Scholar 

  196. ————— and —————. 1947. The chemical nature and function of the components of cell nuclei. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.12: 224–236.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. ————— and —————. 1950. The cytological interpretations of Feulgen reaction. Biochem. Jour.47: 508–512.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  198. Stowell, R. E. 1946. The specificity of Feulgen reaction for thymonucleic acid. Stain Techn.21: 137–148.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Suomalainen, E. T. 1949. Investigations on secondary constrictions in Polygonatum. Hereditas.35: 86–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  200. Swanson, C. P. 1942. The effects of ultraviolet and X-ray treatment on the pollen tube chromosomes ofTradescantia. Genetics27: 491–503.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  201. ————— 1943. The behaviour of meiotic prophase chromosomes as revealed through the use of high temperatures. Amer. Jour. Bot.30: 422–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. ————— 1944. The effect of ultraviolet (2537 Å) on X-ray-induced chromosomal aberrations. Genetics29: 61–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  203. Swift, H. 1953. Quantitative aspects of nuclear nucleoproteins. Int. Rev. Cytol.2: 1–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  204. Taylor, J. H. 1953. Autoradiographic detection of incorporation of P32 into chromosomes during meiosis and mitosis. Exp. Cell. Res.4: 164–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  205. -----,P. Woods andW. Hughes. 1957. The organisation and duplication of chromosomes as revealed by autoradiographic studies using Tritium-labeled thymidine. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. [U.S.A.]: 122–128.

  206. Thorell, B. 1955.In: Chargaff and Davidson. [Eds.] Nucleic acids. Vol. 2.

  207. Tjio, J. H., andA. Levan. 1950a. Quadruple structure of the centromere. Nature165: 368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. ————— and —————. 1950b. The use of oxyquinoline in chromosome analysis. Ann. Est. Exp. Auladei2: 21–64.

    Google Scholar 

  209. Tomlin, S. G., andH. G. Callan. 1951. Preliminary account of an electron microscope study of chromosomes from newt oocytes. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci.92: 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  210. Vaarama, A. 1954. Cytological observations onPleurozium schreberi with special reference to centromere evolution. Ann. Bot. Soc. Vanamo28: 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  211. Vanderlyn, L. 1949. Heterochromatin problem in cytogenetics as related to other branches of investigation. Bot. Rev.15: 507–582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  212. Vendrely, R., andC. Vendrely. 1948. La teneur du noyan cellulaire en acide désoxyribonucleique à travers les organes, les individus et les especes animales. Techniques et premiers résultats. Experientia4: 434–436.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  213. ————— and —————. 1949. La teneur de noyan cellulaire en acide désoxyribonucleique à travers les organes, les individus et les espèces animales. Etude parliculiere des mammifères. Experientia5: 327–329.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  214. Vilkomerson, H. 1950. The unusual meiotic behaviour ofThymus wiegandii. Exp. Cell. Res.1: 534–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  215. Wahl, H. H. Chromosome numbers and meiosis in the genusCarex. Amer. Jour. Bot.40: 458–470.

  216. Watson, M. J. D. 1954. Symposium on genetic recombination. Jour. Cell. & Comp. Physiol. Suppl.45: 2.

  217. ————— andE. H. C. Crick. 1953. Genetical implications of the structure of desoxyribonucleic acid. Nature171: 964–967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  218. White, M. J. D. 1954. Animal cytology and evolution. Sec. ed.

  219. Wrinch, D. M. 1936. On the molecular structure of the chromosomes. Protoplasma25: 550–569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  220. Wyatt, G. R. 1950. Occurrence of 5-methyl cytosine in nucleic acids. Nature166: 237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  221. Yasuzumi, G., Z. Odate andY. Ota. 1951. The fine structure of salivary chromosomes. Cytologia16: 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  222. —————, andA. Kondo. 1951. The physico-chemical properties of the sex chromosome. Jour. Hered.42: 219–223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  223. —————, andS. Higshizawa. 1955. Submicroscopic structure of the Carp erthrocyte as revealed by electron microscopy. Cytologia20: 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  224. Yasuzumi, G., G. Miyao, Y. Yamamato andY. Yokohama. 1951. The microstructure and origin of threadlike bodies from the metabolic nucleus. Chromosoma4: 359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  225. Zirkle, C. C. 1928. The effect of hydrogen ion concentration upon the fixation image of various compounds of chromium. Protoplasma 201–227.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Calcutta University, India

    Arun Kumar Sharma & Archana Sharma

Authors
  1. Arun Kumar Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Archana Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, A.K., Sharma, A. Recent advances in the study of chromosome structure. Bot. Rev 24, 511–549 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872593

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872593

Keywords

Search

Navigation