Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metabolic phenomena associated with virus infection in plants

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

There are two major physiological effects of virus infection in plants which may be summarized as follows:

Respiratory activities are markedly increased very early during the course of the infection which corresponds to the period of arrival of virus particles from points of infection. The plant recovers from this initial shock, although the quantity of virus protein continues to increase.

The permeability of cytoplasm or its membranes is greatly altered in respect to soluble substances. This accounts for the accumulation of carbohydrate in the leaves, and the accumulation of nutrient ions in the roots at the expense of tops. Since the changes in permeability vary for different ions, the nutritional state of the plant is more significantly disturbed than the general reduction of the total ash would suggest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Allard, H. A. Some properties of the virus of the mosaic disease of tobacco. Jour. Agr. Res.6: 649–674. 1916.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Artschwager, E. F. Histological studies on potato leaf-roll. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 559–570. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asuncion, S. Mosaic disease and its effect on the sugar industry in the Philippine Islands. Philippine Agr. Rev.18: 33–38. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bachmann, W. andWohlfeil, T. Stoffwechselversuche mit einen Coli-Bacteriophagen. Zentr. Bakt. Parasitenk., Abt. 1. Orig.104: 256–261. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey, E. M. Report on commercial insecticides and fungicides. Part II. Examination of insecticides, fungicides,etc. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 258: 368–377. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balls, A. K. andMartin, L. F. Amylase activity of mosaic tobacco. Enzymologia5: 233–238. 1938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baur, E. Weitere Mitteilungen über die infektiöse Chlorose der Malvaceen und über einige analoge Erscheinungen beiLigustrum undLaburnum. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.24: 416–428. 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bawden, F. C. andPirie, N. W. The isolation and some properties of liquid crystalline substances from solanaceous plants infected with three strains of tobacco mosaic virus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B.123: 274–320. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bechhold, H. Ferment oder Lebewesen? Koll-Zeit.66: 329–341. 1934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. —————. Ferment oder Lebewesen? Koll-Zeit.67: 66–79. 1934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beijerinck, M. W. Über ein Kontagium vivum fluidum als Ursache der Flechenkrankheit der Tabaksblätter. Centralb. Bact. II.5: 27–33. 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bennett, C. W. The relation of viruses to plant tissue. Bot. Rev.6: 427–473. 1940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boas, F. Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Kartoffelabbaues. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.29: 171–176. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bolas, B. D. andBewley, W. F. Aucuba or yellow mosaic of the tomato: a note on metabolism. Nature (Lond.)126: 471. 1930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boncquet, P. A. Presence of nitrites and ammonia in diseased plants. Its significance with regard to crop rotation and soil depletion. Jour. Am. Chem. Soc.38: 2572–2576. 1916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Böning, K. Die Mosaikkrankheit der Ackerbohne (Viccia faba L.). Ein Beitrage zu dem Mosaik der Papilionaceen. Forsch. Gebiet Pflanzenkr. Immun. Pflanzenreich4: 43–111. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  17. —————. Die Mosaikkrankheit der Rübe. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.37: 19–25. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ————— Die Mosaikkrankheit der Rübe. Forsch. Gebiet Pflanzenkr. Immun. Pflanzenreich3: 81–128. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bordet, J. Concerning the theories of the so-called “bacteriophage”. Brit. Med. Jour.1922 (2): 296. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brewer, P. A., Kendrick, J. B. andGardner, M. W. Effect of mosaic on the carbohydrate and nitrogen content of the tomato plant. Phytopath.16: 843–851. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bronfenbrenner, J. J. Further studies on so-called bacteriophage. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.22: 81–82. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  22. —————. Does bacteriophage respire? Science63: 51–52. 1926.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. ————— Studies on the bacteriophage of d’Herelle. VIII. The mechanism of lysis of dead bacteria in the presence of bacteriophage. Jour. Exp. Med.45: 887–909. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ————— Respiration of so-called filterable viruses. Proc. Exp. Biol. Med.24: 176–177. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bunzell, H. H. Biochemical study of the curly-top disease of sugar beets. Science35: 389. 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  26. —————. The measurement of the oxidase content of plant juices. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Bul. 238: 1–40. 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —————. A biochemical study of the curly-top sugar beet. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Bul. 277: 1–28. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  28. —————. Die Rolle der Oxydasen in der Blattrollkrankheit der Zuckerrübe. Biochem. Zeit.50: 185–208. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  29. —————. Oxidases in healthy and in curly-dwarf potatoes. Jour. Agr. Res.2: 373–404. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  30. —————. Oxidase reaction in healthy and in blighted spinach. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 377–384. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Caldwell, J. The physiology of virus diseases in plants. VI. Some effects of mosaic on the metabolism of the tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol.21: 206–224. 1934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Campbell, E. G. Potato leaf-roll as affects the carbohydrate content and nitrogen content of the host. Phytopath.15: 427–430. 1925.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Carsner, E. andStahl, C. I. Studies on curly-top diseases of the sugar beet. Jour. Agr. Res.28: 297–320. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chapman, G. H. “Mosaic” and allied diseases, with especial reference to tobacco and tomato. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta., 25th Ann. Rep., Publ. Doc.31: 41–57. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  35. —————. Mosaic disease of tobacco. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 125: 73–117. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chrzaszcz, T. andGoralowna, C. Über die Diastasemenge der Kuhmilch unter pathologischen Bedingungen. Biochem. Zeit.180: 263–271. 1927.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Coleman, L. C. Spike disease of sandal. Mysore Dept. Agr., Mycol. Ser., Bul.3: 1–52. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Crafts, A. S. Movement of viruses, auxins and chemical indicators in plants. Bot. Rev.5: 471–504. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dickson, B. T. Studies concerning mosaic diseases. MacDonald College, Quebec, Tech. Bul.2: 1–125. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Doby, G. Biochemische Untersuchungen über die Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel. I. Die Oxydasen der ruhenden Knollen. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.21: 10–17. 1911.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. —————. Biochemische Untersuchungen über die Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel. II. Die Oxydasen der ruhenden und angetriebenen Knollen. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.21: 321–336. 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  42. —————. Biochemische Untersuchungen über die Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel. III. Chemische Beschaffenheit kranker und gesunder Pflanzenteile. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.22: 204–211. 1912.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Domínguez, F. A. Lopez. Has “yellow-stripe” or “mottling” disease any effect on the sugar content of cane juice. Jour. Dept. Agr., Porto Rico3: 47–64. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dunlap, A. A. Effects of mosaic upon the chlorophyll content of tobacco. Phytopath.18: 697–700. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  45. —————. Changes in total nitrogen, total carbohydrate, and carbon dioxide production in leaf tissues caused by virus diseases. Am. Jour. Bot.16: 844–845. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  46. —————. The total nitrogen and carbohydrates, and the relative rates of respiration in virus infected plants. Am. Jour. Bot.17: 348–357. 1930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. —————. Carbohydrate variations accompanying the mosaic disease of tobacco. Am. Jour. Bot.18: 328–336. 1931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Eaton, M. D. A quantitative study of the respiration ofStaphylococcus cultures lysed by bacteriophage. Jour. Bact.21: 143–156. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Elmer, O. H. Transmissibility and pathological effects of the mosaic disease. Iowa State Coll. Agr., Res. Bul.82: 37–91. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Esmarch, F. Zur Kenntnis des Stoffwechsels in blattrollkranken Kartoffeln. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.29: 1–20. 1919.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Fejgen, B. andSupniewski, J. Sur la nature du phénomène de d’Herelle. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol.89: 1385–1386. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Franke, H. M. Untersuchungen über die Physiologie der pflanzlichen Virose. Biochem. Zeit.293: 39–63. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Freiberg, G. W. Studies in the mosaic diseases of plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.4: 175–226. 1917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gortner, R. A. Viruses—living or nonliving? Science87: 529–530. 1938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gratia, A. andFredericz, P. Comparaison entre la reproduction en série des bactériophages et virus des plantes et l’activation en série du fibrin-ferment. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol.126: 906–908. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Grüss, J. Abhandlungen über Enzymwirkungen. I. Enzymwirkungen am Wundrand der Kartoffelknolle. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.17: 65–79. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Harvey, R. B. Hydrogen ion changes in the mosaic disease of tobacco plants and their relation to catalase. Jour. Biol. Chem.42: 397–400. 1920.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hasselbring, H. andAlsberg, C. L. Studies upon oxidases. Science31: 637. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Heintzel, K. Contagiöse Pflanzenkrankheiten ohne Microben unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Mosaikkrankheit des Tabaksblätter. Inaug. Diss., Univ. Erlangen 1–46. 1900.

  60. Hetler, D. M. andBronfenbrenner, J. J. Studies on the bacteriophage of d’Herelle. IX. Evidence of the hydrolysis of bacterial protein during lysis. Jour. Exp. Med.48: 269. 1928.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hiltner, L. Versuche über die Ursachen der Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel. II. Weitere Beobachtungen über die “Starkeschoppung” in blattrollkranken Kartoffelstauden. Prakt. Blätt. Pflanzenbau. Pflanzenschutz17: 15–19. 1919.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. ————— Über den Zusummenhang der Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel mit der Stärkeanhäufung in ihren Blättern. Prakt. Blätt. Pflanzenbau u. Pflanzenschutz16: 138–141. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Holmes, Francis O. Local and systemic increase of tobacco mosaic virus. Am. Jour. Bot.17: 789–805. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. —————. Local lesions of mosaic inNicotiana tabacum L. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst.3: 163–172. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  65. —————. Symptoms of tobacco mosaic disease. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst.4: 321–357. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hunger, F. W. T. Bemerkung zur Woods’schen Theorie über die Mosaikkrankheit des Tabaks. Bul. de l’Institut Botanique de Buitenzorg.17: 1–9. 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  67. —————. Untersuchungen und Betrachtungen über die Mosaikkrankheit der Tabakspflanze. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.15: 257–311. 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Iyengar, A. V. Varadaraja. Contributions to the study of Spike disease of Sandal (Santalum album Linn.). Part II. Analysis of leaves from healthy and spiked trees. Jour. Indian Inst. Sci., Bangalore11A: 97–102. 1928.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. —————. Contributions to the study of Spike disease of Sandal (Santalum album Linn.). Part III. Physico-chemical study of the leaf-sap. Jour. Indian Inst. Sci., Bangalore11A: 103–109. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Jodidi, S. L., Kellogg, E. H. andTrue, Rodney, H. Nitrogen metabolism in normal and in blighted spinach. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 385–408. 1918.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. ————— The mosaic disease of spinach as characterized by its nitrogen constituents. Jour. Am. Chem. Soc.42: 1061–1070. 1920.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. —————. A mosaic disease of cabbage as revealed by its nitrogen constituents. Jour. Am. Chem. Soc.42: 1883–1892. 1920.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Köck, G. andKornauth, K. Mitteilungen des Komitees zum Studium der Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel. Nr. 2. Studien über die Ursache der Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel und über die Möglichkeit der Uebertragung dieser Krankheit durch das Saatgut und den Boden. Zeit. f.d. landw. Versuchswes. in Öst.14: 759–805. 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Laubert, R. Über die Blattrollkrankheit der Syringen und die dabie auftretende abnorme Stärkeanhaufung in den Blättern der kranken Pflanzen. Gartenflora, Zeit. Garten. Blumenkunde63: 9–11. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lemmon, Paul. Comparative studies on metabolism of healthy and mosaic-infected tobacco leaves. Respiration Studies, Am. Jour. Bot.22: 962. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Lind, Jens. Runkeroernes mosaikysge. Tidsskr. Planteavl.22: 444–457. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Lindemuth, Hugo. Studien über die sogenannte Panaschüre und übereinige begleitende Erscheinungen. Landw. Jahr.36: 807–862. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lominski, Iwo. Recherches sur la teneur en catalase des filtrats de cultures et des cultures microbiennes lysées par le bacteriophage. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol.116: 839–841. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Lüdtke, Max. Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Stoffwechsels mosaikkranker und gesunder Tabakpflanzen. Phytopath. Zeit.2: 341–359. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Lynen, Feodor. Das Virusproblem von chemischen Gesichtspunkt aus. Koll. Zeit.85: 222–234. 1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Lyon, H. L. Lahaina cane injured by Yellow-stripe disease. Hawaiian Planters’ Record10: 320–322. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Magee, C. J. P. Investigation on the bunchy-top disease of the banana. Aust. Council Sci. Ind. Res. Bul.30. 1927.

  83. McKinley, Earl B. andCoulter, C. B. A simple respirometer for microbal respiration. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.24: 685–688. 1927.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Murphy, Paul A. On the cause of rolling in potato foliage; and on some further insect carriers of the leaf-roll disease. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc.17: 163–184. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Neger, F. W. Die Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel. Deut. Landwirt. Presse45: 469–470. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  86. —————. Die Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel. Ein Beitrage zur Aetiologie der Krankheit und der Physiologie der Kartoffelstaude überhaupt. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.29: 27–48. 1919.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Northrop, John M. Chemical nature and mode of formation of pepsin, trypsin, and bacteriophage. Science86: 479–483. 1937.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Ortwijn Botjes, J. G. De bladrolziekte von de aardappelplant. Diss. Wageningen (Veenman, Wageningen).

  89. Pantanelli, E. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Rometkrankheit oder Krautern der Rebe. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.22: 1–38. 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Parker, R. F. andSmythe, C. V. Immunological and chemical investigation of vaccine virus. V. Metabolic studies of elementary bodies of vaccinia. Jour. Exp. Med.65: 109–120. 1937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Peterson, P. D. Plastid pigments and chlorophyllase contents of tobacco as influenced by three types of mosaic. Phytopath.21: 119. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Pirie, Antoinette andHolmes, Barbara Elizabeth. A study of the enzymes of the Agalactia virus. Brit. Jour. Exp. Path.14: 290–296. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Poppe, K. andBusch, G. Fermenstudien am Virus der Maul- und Klauenseuche. Centralbl. Bakt., Parasitenk., Infekt.119: 398–406. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Pyl, Gottfried. Fermenstudien am Virus der Maul- und Klauenseuche. Centralbl. Bakt., Parasitenk., Infekt.121: 299–301. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Quanjer, H. M. Die Nekrose des Phloems der Kartoffelpflanze, die Ursache der Blattrollkrankheit. Meded. Rijks Hoogere Land.—Tuin- en Boschbouwschool (Wageningen), deel6, afl.2: 41–80. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  96. —————. On the nature, mode of dissemination and control of phloemnecrosis (leaf-roll) and related diseases. Meded. Rijks Hoogere Land.—Tuin- en Baschbouwschool (Wageningen), deel10, 91–138. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  97. —————. Sur la fonction du tissu cribble. Med. v.d. Landbouwhoogeschool, Wageningen16: 95–104. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  98. —————. The mosaic disease of the Solanaceae, its relation to the phloem-necrosis, and its effect upon potato culture. Phytopath.10: 35–47. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  99. —————. The methods of classification of plant viruses, and an attempt to classify the name potato viruses. Phytopath.21: 577–613. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  100. ————— De mozaiekziekte van de Solanaceeën, hare verwantschop mit de phloemnekrose en hare beteekenis voor de aardappelcultuur. Med. Landbouwhoogeschool, Wageningen17: 1. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  101. ————— Aard. verspreidingswijze en bestrijding van phloemnecrose (bladrol) en verwante verschijnselen o.a. sereh. Med. Rijks Hoogere Land.—Tuin—en Boschbouwschool (Wageningen)10: 1. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Rankin, W. H. andHockey, J. F. Mosaic and leaf curl (yellows) of the cultivated red raspberry. Phytopath.12: 253–264. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Rao, D. A. Rama andSreenivasaya, M. Contributions to the study of Spike-disease of Sandal (Santalum album Linn.). Part IV. Chemical composition of healthy and spiked Sandal stems. Jour. Indian Inst. Sci., Bangalore11A: 241–243. 1928.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Rawlins, R. E. andTakahashi, Wm. N. The nature of viruses. Science87: 255–256. 1938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Reed, H. S. The enzyme activities involved in certain fruit diseases. Va. Exp. Sta. Rep. 51–77. 1911/12.

  106. Rischkov, V. L. andSoukhov, K. S. Virus of tobacco-mosaic tested for its power of fermentative activity. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.21: 265–268. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Robbins, W. W. Mosaic disease of sugar beets. Phytopath.11: 349–365. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Rosa, J. T. Chemical changes accompanying the western yellow blight of tomato. Plant Physiol.2: 163–169. 1927.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Rose, D. H. Oxidation in healthy and diseased apple bark. Bot. Gaz.60: 55–65. 1915.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Rusinov, P. G. Einige Daten zur Physiologie des Zusammenrollen der Kartoffelblätter. Morbi Plantarum, Leningrad19: 148–159. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Samuel, Geoffrey. The movement of tobacco mosaic virus within the plant. Ann. Appl. Biol.21: 90–111. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Schaffnit, E. andLüdtke, Max. Untersuchungen über Viruskrankheiten. (9. Mitt.). Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Stoffwechsels mosaikkranker und gesunder Tabakpflanzen. Phytopath. Zeit.2: 341–359. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Schander, R. andTiesenhausen, M. V. Kann man die phloemnekrose als Ursache oder Symptom der Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel ansehen? Kaiser Wilhelms Int. Landw. Bromberg Bd.2, Heft 2: 115–124. 1914. (Abstract in Zeit. f. Pflanzenkr. Bd.25, Heft 1: 16–18. 1915.)

    Google Scholar 

  114. Schmidt, E. W. Zur Mosaikkrankheit der Zuckerrübe. Ber. deut. bot. Gesell.45: 598–601. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Schüller, H. Stoffwechsel und Fermentuntersuchungen an Bacteriophagen. Biochem. Zeit.276: 254–261. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Shibata, K. Die Enzymbildung in schrumpfkranken Maulbeerbäumen (Vorlaufige Mitteilung). Bot. Mag.17: 157. 1903. (Abstract in Bot. Centralbl.98: 17. 1905.)

    Google Scholar 

  117. Smith, E. F. Additional evidence of the communicability of peach yellows and peach rosette. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Path. Bul.1: 1–65. 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Smith, Ralph E. andBoncquet, P. A. New light on curly-top of sugar beets. Phytopath.5: 103–107. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  119. —————. Connection of a bacterial organism with curly-leaf of the sugar beet. Phytopath.5: 335–342. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Sorauer, Paul. Die angeblicke Kartoffelepidemie, genannt die “Blattrollkrankheit”. Intern. phytopath. Dienst. Jahrg.1: 33–59. (Beigabe zu Zeit. f. Pflanzenkr.18: 1908.)

  121. Spieckermann, A. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Bakterienring- und Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffelpflanze. Jahrsbr. Vereinig. f. angew. Bot.8: 1–19. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  122. —————. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Bakterienring- und Blattrollkrankheiten der Kartoffelpflanze. Nachtrag. Jahrsbr. Vereinig. f. angew. Bot.8: 173–177. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Sreenivasaya, M. andSastri, B. N. Contributions to the study of Spike-disease of Sandal (Santalum album Linn.). Part I. Diastatic activity of the leaves. Jour. Indian Inst. Sci., Bangalore11A: 23–29. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Stahel, Gerold. De zeefvatenziekte (phloëmnecrose) van de Liberiakoffie in Suriname (koffiewortelziekte). Meded. Dept. Land. Suriname. No.12. 1917.

  125. -----. De zeefvatenziekte (Phlöemnecrose) van de Liberiakoffie in Suriname. Dept. Landw. in Suriname. Bul.40: 1920.

  126. Stevenson, John A. The mottling or Yellow-stripe disease of sugar cane. Jour. Dept. Agr., Porto Rico3: 1–76. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Suzuki, U. Investigations on the Mulberry Dwarf troubles, a disease widely spread in Japan. Bull. Coll. Agr., Imp. Univ. Tokyo, Japan4: 267–288. 1900/02.

    Google Scholar 

  128. —————. Observations on the Mulberry Dwarf troubles (Schrumpfkrankheit), a disease widely spread in Japan. Bull. Coll. Agr., Imp. Univ., Tokyo, Japan4: 359–360. 1900/02.

    Google Scholar 

  129. —————. Chemische und physiologische Studien über die Schrumpfkrankheit des Maulbeerbaumes; eine in Japan sehr weit verbreitete Krankheit. II. Über Oxydasen in Maulbeerbaum und ihre Beziehungen zur der Krankheit. Zeit. Pflanzenkr.12: 203–278. 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Thung, T. H. Physiologisch onderzoek met betrekking tot het virus der bladrolziekte van de aardappelplant,Solanum tuberosum L. Tijdschr. over Plantenziekten34: 1–74. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Tollenaar, Dirk. Omzettsingen koolhydraten in het blad vanNicotiana tabacum L. Land. Landouw.—Scheikunde, Wageningen Lab., Plantenphysiol. Onderzoek.12: 1–142. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  132. True, Rodnay H., Black, Otis F. andKelly, James W. Ash content in normal and in blighted spinach. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 371–375. 1918.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. ————— Physiological studies of normal and blighted spinach. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 369–370. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  134. ————— Carbohydrate production in healthy and in blighted spinach. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 381–384. 1918.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Vollrath C. Untersuchungen über den Einfluss aüsserer und innerer Krankheiten auf den Enzymgehalt der Kuhmilch. Inaug. Diss. Stuttgart. 1912.

  136. Went, F. A. F. C. De serehziekte. In Wakker, J. H. and F. A. F. C. Went. De ziekten van het suikerriet op Java, die niet door dieren veroorzaakt worden. 76–97, E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1898.

  137. Whitehead, T. Respiration of healthy and leaf-roll potatoes. Nature128: 967. 1931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Wohlfeil, Traugott. Experimentelle Beiträge zur Theorie de bacteriophagen lyse. Zeit. Hyg. Infektionskrankh.108: 733–745. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Woods, Albert, F. The destruction of chlorophyll by oxidizing enzymes. Centralbl. f. Bakt., Parasitenk., Infekt., Zweite Abteilung5: 745–754. 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  140. —————. Inhibiting action of oxidase upon diastase. Science, N.S.11: 17–19. 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  141. —————. Observations on the mosaic disease of tobacco. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Bul.18: 1–24. 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Woods, Mark W. Reversible inhibition of tobacco mosaic virus in living cells with 0.0002 molar sodium cyanide. Science91: 295–296. 1940.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Wynd, F. Lyle. The respiration of mosaic infected tobacco plants. Plant Physiol.18: 90–98. 1943.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. —————. Certain enzymatic activities of normal and mosaic infected tobacco plants. Jour. Gen. Physiol.25: 649–661. 1942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. —————. Physiological disturbances in tobacco plants accompanying mosaic infection. Ill. Acad. Sci.34: 92–93. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  146. ————— The nature of the catalase reaction in the residue ofStaphylococcus aureus lysed by bacteriophage. Jour. Bact.38: 659–675. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois, USA

    F. Lyle Wynd

Authors
  1. F. Lyle Wynd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wynd, F.L. Metabolic phenomena associated with virus infection in plants. Bot. Rev 9, 395–465 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872485

Keywords

Search

Navigation