Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Breeding for disease resistance in wheat, oats, barley and flax

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliograph

  1. Aamodt, O. S. The inheritance of growth habit and resistance to stem rust in a cross between two varieties of common wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.24: 457–470. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —————. Varietal trials, physiologic specialization, and breeding spring wheats for resistance toTilletia tritici andT. levis. Canad. Jour. Res.5: 501–528. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  3. -----. The relation between physiologic forms of phytopathogenic fungi and the problem of breeding for resistance to disease. Proc. V Pac. Sci. Congr. (1933): 2615–2625. 1934.

  4. ————— Reaction of barley varieties to infection with covered smut (Ustilago hordei). Canad. Jour. Res.12: 590–613. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abbott, E. V. Stem rust of wheat in Peru. Phytopath.19: 1041–1043. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allen, Ruth. A cytological study of infection of Baart and Kanred wheats byPuccinia graminis tritici. Jour. Agr. Res.23: 131–151. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allison, C. C. Studies on the genetics of smuts of barley and oats in relation to pathogenicity. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 119. 1937.

  8. ————— Studies on inheritance of resistance to wilt in flax. [Abst.] Phytopath.28: 1. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Armstrong, S. F. The mendelian inheritance of susceptibility and resistance to yellow rust (Puccinia glumarum E. and H.) in wheat. Jour. Agr. Sci.12: 57–96. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arthur, J. C. Wheat scab. Indiana Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 36. 1891.

  11. Atanasoff, D. Fusarium-blight (scab) of wheat and cereals. Jour. Agr. Res.20: 1–32. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ausemus, E. R. Correlated inheritance of reaction to diseases and of certain botanical characters in triangular wheat crosses. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 31–57. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Austin, W. W. and Robertson, D. W. Inheritance of resistance toUstilago levis (K. and S.) Magn. (covered smut) in a cross between Markton and Colorado 37 oats. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.28: 467–471. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barker, H. D. A study of wilt resistance in flax. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 20. 1923.

  15. Barney, A. F. The inheritance of smut resistance in crosses of certain varieties of oats. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.16: 283–291. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barrus, M. F. An anthracnose-resistant red kidney bean. Phytopath.5: 303–311. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bever, W. M. Reaction of wheat, barley, and rye varieties to stripe rust in the Pacific Northwest. U. S. Dept. Agr., Circ. 501. 1938.

  18. Biffen, R. H. Mendel’s laws of inheritance and wheat breeding. Jour. Agr. Sci.5: 4–48. 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  19. —————. Studies in the inheritance of disease resistance. Jour. Agr. Sci.2: 109–128. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  20. —————. Studies in the inheritance of disease resistance. Jour. Agr. Sci.4: 421–429. 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bolley, H. L. Flax wilt and flax sick soil. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 50: 27–60. 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Borlaug, N. E. andChristensen, J. J. Variations inFusarium lini. [Abst.] Phytopath.31: 4. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brefeld, O. Untersuchungen aus dem Gesammtgebiete der Mykologie. XIII. Die Brandpilze IV. 1905.

  24. Briggs, F. N. Inheritance of resistance to bunt,Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) Winter, in wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.32: 973–990. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  25. —————. Dehulling barley seed with sulphuric acid to induce infection with covered smut. Jour. Agr. Res.35: 907–914. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  26. —————. Breeding wheats resistant to bunt by the backcross method. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 239–244. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —————. Inheritance of the second factor for resistance to bunt,Tilletia tritici, in the Hussar wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.40: 225–232. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  28. —————. Inheritance of resistance to bunt,Tilletia tritici, in White Odessa wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.40: 353–359. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  29. —————. Inheritance of resistance to bunt,Tilletia tritici, in hybrids of White Federation and Banner Berkeley wheats. Jour. Agr. Res.42: 307–313. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  30. —————. Inheritance of resistance to bunt,Tilletia tritici, in crosses of White Federation with Turkey wheats. Jour. Agr. Res.44: 121–126. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  31. —————. A third factor for resistance to bunt,Tilletia tritici, in wheat hybrids. Jour. Genet.27: 435–441. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. —————. Inheritance of resistance to bunt,Tilletia tritici, in Sherman and Oro wheat hybrids. Genetics19: 73–82. 1934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. —————. Inheritance of resistance to bunt,Tilletia tritici, in hybrids of Turkey wheats, C.I. 1558, Band C.I. 2578. Hilgardia10: 19–25. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  34. —————. The use of the backcross in crop improvement. Am. Nat.72: 285–292. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. ————— Linkage of factors for resistance to mildew in barley. Jour. Genet.37: 107–117. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Broadfoot, W. C. Studies on the parasitisms ofFusarium lini Bolley. Phytopath.16: 951–978. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  37. —————. Studies on foot and root rot of wheat. I. Effect of age of the wheat plant upon the development of foot and root rot. Canad. Jour. Res.8: 483–491. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brookins, W. W. Linkage relationship of the genes differentiating stem rust reaction in barley. Thesis, Univ. Minn. 1940.

  39. Burnett, L. C. Iogold oats. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.247: 186–196. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  40. -----et al. Improved oat varieties for the corn belt. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul. 1343. 1925.

  41. Burnham, C. R. The inheritance of Fusarium wilt in flax. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.24: 734–749. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Carleton, M. S. Cereal rusts of the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Physiol. & Path. Bul. 16. 1899.

  43. -----. Lessons from the grain-rust epidemic of 1904. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm. Bul. 219. 1904.

  44. Christensen, J. J. Studies on the parasitism ofHelminthosporium sativum. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 11. 1922.

  45. -----. The origin of parasitic races of pathogenic fungi through mutation. The Genetics of Pathogenic Organisms. Sci. Press. pp. 77–82. 1940.

  46. -----and Graham, T. W. Physiologic specialization and variation inHelminthosporium graminium rab. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 95. 1934.

  47. ————— Physiologic specialization and genetics of the smut fungi. Bot. Rev.6: 389–425. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  48. ————— Susceptibility of wheat varieties and hybrids to wheat scab in Minnesota. [Abst.] Phytopath.17: 40. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  49. -----et al. Susceptibility of wheat varieties and hybrids to fusarial head blight in Minnesota. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 59. 1929.

  50. Churchward, J. G. Studies on physiologic specialization of the organism causing bunt in wheat and the genetics of resistance to this and certain other wheat disease. Part II. Genetical studies. Jour. & Proc. Roy. Soc. New South Wales71: 547–590. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Clark, J. A. Inheritance of stem rust and bunt reactions in spring wheat crosses. Worlds Grain Exhib. & Conf., Regina, Canada. 1933. Proc.2: 37–43. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  52. —————. Registration of improved wheat varieties. VIII. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.27: 71–75. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  53. -----. Improvement in wheat. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1936: 207–302.

  54. —————. Registration of improved wheat varieties. XII. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.30: 1037–1042. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. —————. Registration of improved wheat varieties. XIII. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.32: 72–75. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  56. -----and Ausemus, E. R. Inheritance of immunity from black stem rust, yield, and protein content in Hope wheat crosses with susceptible and resistant varieties. (1928.) [Mim.]

  57. —————. Immunity of Hope wheat from black stem rust inherited as a dominant character. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.20: 152–159. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  58. ————— Inheritance of stem rust reaction in wheat. Part I. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.25: 497–511. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  59. —————et al. Registration of improved wheat varieties. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.20: 1318–1322. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  60. —————et al. Inheritance of bunt reaction and other characters in Hope wheat crosses. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 413–425. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  61. ————— Inheritance of stem rust reaction in wheat. II. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.27: 400–407. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Coffman, F. A. et al. Inheritance of resistance in oats toUstilago levis. Jour. Agr. Res.43: 1085–1099. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cotter, R. U. andLevine, M. N. Experiments in crossing varieties ofPuccinia graminis. [Abst.] Phytopath.28: 6. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Craigie, J. H. Discovery of the function of pycnidia of the rust fungi. Nature120: 765. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. —————. On the occurrence of pycnia and aecia in certain rust fungi. Phytopath.18: 1005. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Davis. R. J. Studies onOphiobolus graminis Sacc. and the take-all disease of wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.31: 801–825. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Davis, W. D. andJones, E. T. Studies in the inheritance of resistance and susceptibility to crown rust (P. coronata Corda) in a cross between selections of Red Rustproof (A. sterilis L.) and Scotch potato (A. sativa L.) Welsh. Jour. Agr.2: 212–221. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Dickson, J. G. Disease of cereal and forage crop plants. 1939.

  69. ————— Disease resistant wheats recently introduced from Russia. Phytopath.23: 8. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dietz, S. M. The inheritance of resistance toPuccinia graminis avenae. [Abst.] Phytopath.15: 54. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  71. —————. Inheritance of resistance in oats toPuccinia graminis avenae. Jour. Agr. Res.37: 1–24. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  72. —————. The varietal responses and inheritance of resistance in barley toE. graminis hordei. P. F. 4. Iowa State Col. Jour. Sci.5: 25–33. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  73. ————— Inheritance of resistance toPuccinia coronata avenae. [Abst.] Phytopath.20: 120. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  74. —————. Inheritance of resistance toErysiphe graminis hordei, p. f. IV. [Abst.] Phytopath.20: 119–120. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Dillman, A. C. Improvement in flax. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1936: 745–785.

  76. Down, E. E. andThayer, J. W. Huron, a new oat variety for Michigan. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta., Quart. Bul.22: 209–212. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Durrell, L. W. and Parker, J. H. Comparative resistance of varieties of oats to crown and stem rust. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 62. 1920.

  78. Edgerton, C. W., andMoreland, C. C. Experiments in varietal resistance to the bean and cotton anthracnoses. La. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 155: 1–24. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Eide, C. J. The pathogenicity and genetics ofGibberella Saubinetii (Mont.) Sacc. F. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 106. 1935.

  80. Eriksson, J. Ueber die Specialisirung des Parasitismus bei den Getreiderostpilzen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.12: 292–331. 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Faris, J. A. Factors influencing the infection of wheat byTilletia tritici andTilletia levis. Mycologia16: 259–282. 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Farrer, W. Results of the Lambrigg bunt experiments of 1900. Agr. Gaz. New South Wales12: 419–430. 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Flor, H. H. Heterothallism and hybridization inTilletia tritici andT. levis. Jour. Agr. Res.44: 49–58. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  84. —————. New physiologic races of flax rust. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 575–592. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Gaines, E. F. The inheritance of resistance to bunt or stinking smut of wheat. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.12: 124–132. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  86. —————. Genetics of bunt resistance in wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.23: 445–480. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  87. —————. The inheritance of disease resistance in wheat and oats. Phytopath.15: 341–349. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  88. —————. The relation of triploid factors and chromosome group in wheat and oats. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.19: 202–205. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  89. ————— Wheat varieties in Washington in 1934. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 338: pp. 24. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  90. —————. Wheat varieties in Washington in 1939. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 398: pp. 22. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Garber, R. J. A preliminary note on the inheritance of rust resistance in oats. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.13: 41–43. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  92. —————et al. Breeding for disease resistance with particular reference to smut of oats. Sci. Agr.9: 103–115. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  93. —————et al. Transgressive segregation for susceptibility to smut in an oat cross. Jour. Agr. Res.39: 953–962. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Gordon, W. L. Effect of temperature on host reactions to physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis avenae Eriks. and Henn. Sci. Agr.11: 95–103. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  95. ————— Oats stem rust investigations in Canada. Sci. Agr.12: 228–235. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Goulden, C. H. Breeding rust resistant varieties of wheat. Fundamental aspects of the problem. Sci. Agr.10: 258–267. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  97. —————et al. The inheritance of resistance toPuccinia graminis tritici in a cross between two varieties ofTriticum vulgare. Anat. Soc.37: 182. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  98. —————et al. The inheritance of resistance toPuccinia graminis tritici in a cross between two varieties ofTriticum vulgare. Phytopath.18: 631–658. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Grevel, F. H. Untersuchung über Vonhandensein biologischer Rassen des Flugbrandes Weizens (Ustilago tritici). Phytopath. Zeits.2: 209–234. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Griffee, F. Correlated inheritance of botanical characters in barley, and manner of relation toHelminthosporium sativum. Jour. Agr. Res.30: 915–935. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  101. —————. Chromosome number in species ofHordeum. Minn. Stud. Pl. Sci. 6: 319–331. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Harrington, J. B. The inheritance of resistance toPuccinia graminis in crosses between varieties of durum wheat. Sci. Agr.5: 265–288. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  103. ————— The inheritance of reaction to black stem rust of wheat in adicoccum × vulgare cross. Canad. Jour. Res.1: 163–188. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Hart, H. Relation of stomatal behavior of stem rust in wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.39: 929–948. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  105. --. Morphologic and physiologic studies on stem rust resistance in cereals. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 266. 1931.

  106. ————— The effect of light intensity and temperature on infection of Hope wheat byPuccinia graminis tritici. Phytopath.25: 1041–1066. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Hayes, H. K. Inheritance of kernel and spike characters in crosses between varieties ofTriticum vulgare. Univ. Minn. Biol. Sci. No. 4: 163–183. 1923.

  108. —————. Breeding for resistance to crown rust, stem rust, smut and desirable agronomic characters in crosses between Bond,Avena byzantina, and cultivated varieties ofAvena sativa. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 164–173. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  109. ————— A study of rust resistance in a cross between Marquis and Kota wheats. Jour. Agr. Res.24: 997–1012. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  110. —————et al. Correlated inheritance in spring wheat crosses of reaction to stem rust, leaf rust, black chaff, and bunt. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 59–66. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  111. --et al. Thatcher wheat. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 325. 1936.

  112. —————et al. Correlated studies in oats of the inheritance of reaction to stem rust and smuts, and of other differential characters. Jour. Agr. Res.36: 437–457. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  113. —————et al. Studies of inheritance in crosses between Bond,Avena byzantina, and varieties ofA. sativa. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 137: 1–38. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  114. —————et al. Genetics of rust resistance in crosses of varieties ofTriticum vulgare with varieties ofT. durum andT. dicoccum. Jour. Agr. Res.19: 523–542. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  115. --et al. Reaction of barley varieties toH. sativum. Part I. Varietal resistance. Part II. Inheritance studies in a cross between Lion and Manchuria. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 21. 1923.

  116. —————et al. Inheritance in wheat of resistance to black stem rust. Phytopath.15: 371–387. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Heald, F. D. and Gaines, E. F. The control of bunt or stinking smut of wheat. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 241. 1930.

  118. Henry, A. W. Root rots of wheat. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 22. 1924.

  119. —————. Flax rust and its control. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 36: pp. 20. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  120. —————. Inheritance of immunity from flax rust. Phytopath.20: 707–721. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Ho, Wen-chun et al. Pythium graminicola Subr. on barley. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 287. 1941.

  122. Holton, C. S. Origin and production of morphologic and pathogenic strains of the oat smut fungi by mutation and hybridization. Jour. Agr. Res.52: 311–317. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  123. —————. A new pathogenically distinct race derived from a cross betweenTilletia tritici andT. levis. Phytopath.28: 371. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  124. ————— New physiologic races ofTilletia tritici andT. levis. Phytopath.32: 117–129. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  125. ————— Varietal reaction to bunt in the Western wheat Region of the United States. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.1: 63–71. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Humphrey, H. B. et al. Revised register of physiologic races of leaf rust of wheat (Puccinia triticina). U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Div. Cer. Crops & Dis. (Unnumb. Pub.). Jan. 1939. [Mim.]

  127. Hurd, Annie May. Hydrogen-ion concentration and varietal resistance of wheat to stem rust and other diseases. Jour. Agr. Res.23: 373–386. 1923.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Hursch, C. R. Morphological and physiological studies on the resistance of wheats toPuccinia graminis tritici Eriks. and Henn. Jour. Agr. Res.27: 381–412. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Johnson, L. P. V. Studies on the inheritance of covered smut reaction, lemma color, awn development, and rachilla pubescence in oats. Canad. Jour. Res.9: 519–541. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Johnson, T. A study of the effect of environmental factors of the variability of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici Eriks. and Henn. Dom. Canada, Dept. Agr., Bul 140: pp. 76. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  131. —————. The effect of high temperatures on uredial development in cereal rusts. Canad. Jour. Res.15: 425–432. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  132. —————. The origin of abnormal rust characteristics through the inbreeding of physiologic races ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Canad. Jour. Res.16: 38. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  133. —————. Crossing and selfing studies with physiologic races of oat stem rust. Canad. Jour. Res.18: 54–67. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  134. —————. Mendelian inheritance of certain pathogenic characters ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Canad. Jour. Res.18: 599–611. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  135. —————. The influence of light and certain other environmental factors on the mature-plant resistance of Hope wheat to stem rust. Canad. Jour. Res.18: 357–371. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  136. ————— Hybridization ofPuccinia graminis tritici withPuccinia graminis secalis andPuccinia graminis agrostides. Sci. Agr.13: 141–153. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  137. —————. Further studies of inheritance of spore color and pathogenicity in crosses between physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.14: 360. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Johnston, C. O. Reaction of certain varieties and species of the genus Hordeum to leaf rust of wheat,Puccinia triticina. Phytopath.26: 235–245. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Johnston, W. H. Studies on the dehulling of barley kernels with sulphuric acid and on the inheritance of reaction to covered smut,Ustilago hordei (Pers.) K. and S. infection in crosses between Glabron and Trebi barleys. Canad. Jour. Res.11: 458–473. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Jones, L. R. andTisdale, W. B. The influence of soil temperature upon the development of flax wilt. Phytopath.12: 409–413. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Kilduff, T. Inheritance of bunt and loose smut reaction and of certain other characters in Kota × Red Bobs and Garnet crosses. Canad. Jour. Res.8: 147–172. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Kirby, R. S. The take-all disease of cereals and grasses. Phytopath.12: 66–88. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  143. —————. The take-all disease of cereals and grasses caused byOphiobolis cariceta (Barkeley and Broome) Sacc. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem. 88: pp. 43. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Kolk, L. A. Relation of host and pathogene in the oat smut,Ustilago avenae. Bul. Torrey Bot. Club57: 443–507. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Kostoff, D. Studies in polyploid plants. Polyploid forms ofTriticum experimentally produced. XII. Bul. Acad. Sci. R.R. S.S. Ser. Biol.: 3–22. 1936. [Abst.].

  146. —————.Triticum timococcum, the most immune wheat experimentally produced. Chron. Bot.4: 213–214. 1938. [Abst.].

    Google Scholar 

  147. Kulkarni. L. G. Correlated inheritance with special reference to disease resistance in spring wheat. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.26: 885–893. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Levine, M. N. et al. Field studies on rust resistance of oat varieties. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 143. 1930.

  149. Macindoe, S. L. The nature and inheritance of resistance to stem rust of wheat.Puccinia graminis tritici, possessed by several resistant parents. Univ. Minn. Thesis. 1941.

  150. MacInnes, Jean and Fogelman, R. Wheat scab in Minnesota. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 18. 1923.

  151. Mains, E. B. andDietz, S. M. Physiologic forms of barley mildew,Erysiphe graminis hordei Marchal. Phytopath.20: 229–239. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  152. ————— Physiologic specialization in the leaf rust of wheat,Puccinia triticina. Phytopath.16: 89–120. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  153. —————et al. Inheritance of resistance to leaf rust,Puccinia triticina Eriks., in crosses of common wheat,Triticum vulgare. VIII. Jour. Agr. Res.32: 931–972. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  154. --and Martini, M. L. Susceptibility of barley to leaf rust (Puccinia anomala) and to powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis hordei). U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 295. 1932.

  155. McFadden, E. S. “Synthetic” rust proof bread wheats. The Dakota Farmer45: 102. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  156. —————. A successful transfer of emmer characters tovulgare wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.22: 1020–1034. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  157. McKinney, H. H. Foot rot diseases of wheat in America. U. S. Dept Agr., Bul. 1347: pp. 40. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Melander, L. W. Effect of temperature and light on the development of the uredial stage ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 861–880. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Melchers, L. E. andParker, J. H. Rust resistance in winter wheat varieties. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul. 1046: pp. 32. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Moore, M. B. Pathogenicity of different collections ofUstilago tritici andU. nuda. [Abst.] Phytopath.26: 103. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  161. —————. A method of inoculating wheat and barley with loose smuts. Phytopath.26: 397–399. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  162. —————et al. A new race of crown rust that attacks Bond Oats. Phytopath.28: 16. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Murphy, H. C. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia coronata avenae. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 433. 1935.

  164. —————et al. Hybrid selections of oats resistant to smuts and rusts. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.28: 370–373. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Myers, W. M. The nature and interaction of genes conditioning reaction to rust in flax. Jour. Agr. Res.55: 631–666. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  166. ————— Meiotic instability as an inherited character in varieties ofTriticum aestivum. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 441–452. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Nahmacher, J. Beitrag zur Immunitatszuchtung der Gerste gegenUstilago nuda forma spec.hordei. Phytopath.4: 597–630. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Neatby, K. W. Factor relations in wheat for resistance to groups of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.12: 130–154. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  169. ————— The inheritance of resistance toPuccinia graminis tritici in crosses between varieties ofT. vulgare. Sci. Agr.10: 389–404. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Newman, L. H. et al. Canadian spring wheat varieties. Canad. Dept. Agr., Pub. 538. 1939.

  171. Newton, Margaret et al. A preliminary study on the hybridization of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.10: 721–731. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  172. —————et al. A study of the inheritance of spore colour and pathogenicity in crosses between physiologic races ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.10: 775. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  173. —————et al. Seedling reactions of wheat varieties to stem rust and leaf rust and of oat varieties to stem rust and crown rust. Canad. Jour. Res.18: 489–506. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  174. Nilsson-Ehle, H. Kreuzungsuntersuchungen an Hafer und Weizen. II. Lunds. Univ. Arsskr. N.F. Afd. 2 Bd. 7, No. 6, pp. 3–84. 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Noble, R. J. Studies on the parasitism ofUrocystis tritici Koern., the organism causing flag smut of wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.27: 451–489. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Padwick, G. W. andHenry, A. W. The relation of species of Agropyron and certain other grasses to the foot rot problem of wheat in Alberta. Canad. Jour. Res.8: 349–363. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Pan, C. L. A genetic study of mature plant resistance in spring wheat to black stem rust,Puccinia graminis tritici, and reaction to black chaff,Bacterium translucens, var.undulosum. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.32: 107–115. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Parker, J. H. Greenhouse experiments on the rust resistance of oat varieties. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul. 629: pp. 16. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  179. —————. A preliminary study of the inheritance of the rust resistance in oats. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.12: 23–38. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Peterson, R. F. Stomatal behavior in relation to the breeding of wheat for resistance to stem rust. Sci. Agr.12: 155–173. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  181. —————et al. Varieties ofTriticum vulgare practically immune in all stages of growth of stem rust. Sci.91: 313. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. ————— A study of the transference of immunity of stem rust fromTriticum durum, var. Iumillo toT. vulgare by hybridization. Sci. Agr.20: 608–623. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Peturson, B. Effect of temperature on the host reactions to physiologic forms ofPuccinia coronata avenae. Sci. Agr.11: 104–110. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  184. Piekenbrock, P. Untersuchungen über das Verhalten desUstilago tritici am Sorten und Kreuzeungen. Kühn.-Arch.15: 411–456. 1927. [Abst. in Rev. Appl. Myc.7: 435. 1928.]

    Google Scholar 

  185. Powers, L. R. Cytologic and genetic studies of variability of strains of wheat derived from interspecific crosses. Jour. Agr. Res.44: 797–831. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  186. ————— Inheritance of reaction to stem rust and barbing of awns in barley crosses. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 1121–1129. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Pridham, J. T. A successful cross betweenTriticum vulgare andTriticum timopheevi. Jour. Australian Inst. Agr. Sci.5: 160–162. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  188. Puttick, G. F. The reaction of the F2 generation of a cross between a common and a durum wheat to two biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis. Phytopath.11: 205–213. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Quisenberry, K. S. Inheritance of winter hardiness, growth habit, and stem-rust reaction in crosses between Minhardi winter and H-44 spring wheats. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 218: pp. 43. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  190. Reed, G. M. Inheritance of resistance of oat hybrids to loose smut. Mycologia17: 163–181. 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. —————. Inheritance of resistance of oats hybrids to loose and covered smut. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.30: 129–176. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. —————. Inheritance of resistance to loose and covered smut in hybrids of Black Mesdag with Hull-less, Silvermine, and Early Champion oats. Am. Jour. Bot.21: 278–291. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. —————. Physiologic specialization of the parasitic fungi. Bot. Rev.1: 119–137. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. —————. Physiological races of oat smuts. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 135–154. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. ————— Influence of environmental factors on the infection of sorghum and oats by smuts. Am. Jour. Bot.11: 579–599. 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. ————— Inheritance of resistance to loose and covered smut in Markton oat hybrids. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 159–176. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  197. Reid, D. A. A study of the inheritance of seedling and mature plant reaction toPuccinia graminis tritici in a cross of Wisconsin No. 38 × Peatland barley. Univ. Minn. Thesis. 1938.

  198. Robinson, B. B. Concerning the transmission of an acquired character in flax. Science (n.s.)67: 242. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Rodenhiser, H. A. The origin of physiologic races in the smut fungi by hybridization. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Pub.12: 73–76. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  200. Roemer, T. Immunitätszüchtung. Eine zusammenfassende Darstellung 14jähriger Arbeiten aus dem Gebiete der Biologie, 1920–1933. Flora N.F.28: 145–196. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  201. Rosenstiel, K. von. Über Meizens-Roggen Bastarde. Forschungsdienst Sonderheft10: 63–76. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Rudorf, W. undRosenstiel, K. von. Untersuchungen über die Widerstandsfähigkeit bei Weizensorten gegen Weizenflugbrand,Ustilago tritici and über ihre Vererbung in Kreuzungen. Zeits. Suchtung, A.9: 324–332. 1934. [Abst. in Rev. Appl. Myc.13: 621. 1934.]

    Google Scholar 

  203. Russell, R. C. Studies on cereal diseases; X. Studies of take-all and its causal organism,Ophiobolus graminis Sacc. Dom. Can. Dept. Agr., Bul. 170: pp. 64. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  204. Samuel, G. andGarrett, S. D. Rhizoctonia solani on cereals in South Australia. Phytopath.22: 827–836. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  205. Sanford, G. B. andBroadfoot, W. C. Studies on the effects of other soil inhabiting micro-organisms on the virulence ofOphiobolus graminis Sacc. Sci. Agr.11: 512–528. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  206. Schafer, E. G. et al. Wheat varieties in Washington. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 207: pp. 31. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  207. Schattenberg, H. Untersuchungen über das Verhalten von Sorten, Kreuzungsnachkommenschaften und Kreuzungspopulationen gegenüber verschiedenen Herkünften von Haferflugbranden. Kühn. Arch.37: 409–449. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  208. Schmitz, N. Wheat. Md. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 198: 60–94. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  209. Scott, I. T. Varietal resistance and susceptibility to wheat scab. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 111: pp. 14. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  210. Shands, R. G. Chevron, a barley variety resistant to stem rust and other diseases. Phytopath.29: 209–211. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  211. —————. Disease resistance ofTriticum timopheevi transferred to common winter wheat. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 709–712. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  212. Smith, D. C. Correlated inheritance in oats of reaction to diseases and other characters. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 102. 1934.

  213. Smith, R. W. Transferring smut immunity to hard red spring wheats. (Note). Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.24: 663. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  214. Smith, W. K. The effect of different temperatures on the reaction of Hope wheat to bunt. Phytopath.22: 615–628. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  215. Sprague, R. Influence of climatological factors in the development ofCercosporella foot rot of winter wheat. U. S. Dept. Agr., Cir. 451. 1937.

  216. —————. Relative susceptibility of certain species of Gramineae toCercosporella herpotrichoides. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 659–670. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  217. -----.Cercosporella foot rot of winter grains in the Pacific Northwest. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Div. Cer. Crops & Dis. (Unnumbered Pub.), pp. 13. Dec. 8, 1939. (Mim.)

  218. —————Cercosporella foot rot of winter cereals. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 428: pp. 24. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  219. Stakman, E. C. Relation betweenPuccinia graminis and plants highly resistant to its attack. Jour. Agr. Res.4: 193–199. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  220. —————et al. Population trends of physiologic races ofPuccinia graminis tritici in the United States from 1930 to 1939. [Abst.]. Phytopath.30: 22. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  221. -----and Hart, Helen. The nature of resistance of cereals to rust. III. Third Int. Cong., Athens1: 253–266.

  222. —————et al. Varietal resistance of spring wheats toTilletia tritici. Univ. Minn. Stud. Biol. Sci.5: 307–317. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  223. ————— The determination of biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis onTriticum spp. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul.8: pp. 10. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  224. —————et al. Die Bestimmung physiologischer Rassen pflanzenpathogener Pilze. Nova Acta Leopoldina (N.S.)3: 281–336. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  225. ————— Origin of physiological forms ofPuccinia graminis through hybridization and mutation. Sci. Agr.10: 707–720. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  226. —————et al. Relation of barberry to the origin and persistence of physiological forms ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 953. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  227. —————et al. Can biologic forms of stem rust on wheat change rapidly enough to interfere with breeding for rust resistance. Jour. Agr. Res.14: 111–124. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  228. ————— Biological forms ofPuccinia graminis on cereals and grasses. Jour. Agr. Res.10: 429. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  229. —————et al. Plasticity of biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 221. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  230. Stanford, E. H. andBriggs, F. N. Two additional factors for resistance to mildew of barley. Jour. Agr. Res.61: 231–236. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Stanton, T. R. Superior germ plasm in oats. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1936: 347–414.

  232. —————. Registration of varieties and strains of oats. VIII. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.32: 76–82. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  233. —————. Registration of varieties and strains of oats. IX. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.32: 76–82. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  234. Stanton, T. R. Registration of varieties and strains of oats. X. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 246–251. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  235. —————et al. Registration of varieties and strains of oats. IV. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.21: 1175–1180. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  236. ————— Oat varieties highly resistant to crown rust and their probable economic value. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.25: 674–83. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  237. —————et al. Inheritance of resistance to loose smut and covered smut in some oat hybrids. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 1073–1083. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  238. —————et al. Markton, an oat variety immune from covered smut. U. S. Dept. Agr., Cir. 324: pp. 8. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  239. Stoa, T. E. et al. The comparative performance of some new varieties of hard red spring wheat. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bimo. Bul. II. No. 3: 3–8. 1940.

  240. Straib, W. Über Resistenz bei Gerste gegenüber Zwergrost und Gelbrost. Der Züchter9: 305–11. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  241. —————. Die Faktorenbeziehungen im Verhalten des Weizens gegen verschiedene Gelbrostrassen. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.77: 18–62. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  242. —————. Über die Vererbung des Verhaltens der Gerste gegenüber Gelbrost. Der Züchter5: 115–122. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  243. Tapke, V. F. Influence of varietal resistance, sap acidity, and certain environmental factors on the occurrence of loose smut in wheat. Jour. Agr. Res.39: 313–339. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  244. —————. An effective and easily applied method of inoculating seed barley with covered smut. Phytopath.25: 1038–1039. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  245. —————. Pathogenic strains inUstilago nigra. (Note) Phytopath.26: 1033–34. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  246. —————. Physiologic races ofUstilago hordei. Jour. Agr. Res.55: 683–692. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  247. —————. Occurrence, identification, and species integrity of the loose smuts of barley,Ustilago nuda, U. nigra, andU. medians. Phytopath.31: 22. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  248. Thompson, W. P. The correlation of characters in hybrids ofTriticum durum andT. vulgare. Genetics10: 285–304. 1925.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  249. Tidd, Joseph S. Studies concerning the reaction of barley to two undescribed physiological races of barley mildew,E. graminis hordei Marchal. Phytopath.27: 51–68. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  250. —————. Inheritance of resistance toErysiphe graminis hordei in a cross between Featherstone and Nepal barley. [Abst.]. Phytopath.30: 24–25. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  251. Tingey, D. C. andTolman, B. Inheritance of resistance to loose smut in certain wheat crosses. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 631–655. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  252. ————— Relief wheat. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 264: pp. 12. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  253. -----and Stanton, T. R. Uton, a new high yielding white oat resistant to loose and covered smut. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 29, 1941.

  254. Tisdale, W. H. Flax wilt: A study of the nature and inheritance of wilt. Jour. Agr. Res.11: 573–605. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  255. Torrie, J. H. Correlated inheritance in oats of reaction to smuts, crown rust, stem rust, and other characters. Jour. Agr. Res.59: 783–804. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  256. Tzitzin, N. V. What does crossing wheat with Agropyron give? Sel ’Khozgiz, Moscow. [Abst.] No. 7. 1937.

  257. Vogel, O. A. andHolton, C. S. Reaction of F3 progenies of an Oro × Turkey-Florence cross to two physiologic races ofTilletia tritici and one ofT. levis. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.30: 55–59. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  258. Waddell, W. H. A study of the relation between the seedling and mature-plant reaction toPuccinia graminis tritici in durum wheat crosses involving Iumillo. Canad. Jour. Agr. Res.18: 258–272. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  259. Wakabayshi, S. A study of hybrid oats.A. sterilis × A. orientalis. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.13: 259–266. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  260. Waldron, L. R. Hybrid selections of Marquis and Kota wheats. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 200. 1926.

  261. ————— Kota, a rust resistant variety of common spring wheat. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.11: 187–195. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  262. Waterhouse, W. L. Australian rust studies. I. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales54: 615–680. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  263. —————. A preliminary account of the origin of two new Australian physiological forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales54: 96. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  264. Watson, Irvine A. Studies on pathological and genetical factors in relation to breeding rust resistant wheats. Univ. Minn. Thesis. 1941.

  265. Welsh, J. N. The inheritance of stem rust and smut reaction and lemma color in oats. Sci. Agr.12: 209–42. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  266. —————. Synthetic production of oat varieties resistant to race 6 and certain other physiologic races of oat stem rust. Canad. Jour. Res.15: 58–69. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Western, J. H. Biology of oat smuts. IV. The invasion of some susceptible and resistant varieties, including Markton, by selected biologic species of smut (Ustilago avenae) (Pers. Jens.) andUstilago kolleri (Wilde). Ann. Appl. Biol.23: 245–263. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  268. Woodward, R. W. and Tingey, D. C. Velvon, a new smooth-awned barley. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 293. 1940.

  269. Woolman, H. M. Infection phenomena and host reactions caused byTilletia tritici in susceptible and nonsusceptible varieties of wheat. Phytopath.20: 637–652. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bureau of Plant Industry, USA

    E. R. Ausemus

Authors
  1. E. R. Ausemus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ausemus, E.R. Breeding for disease resistance in wheat, oats, barley and flax. Bot. Rev 9, 207 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872472

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872472

Keywords

Search

Navigation