Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Somatic segregation

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, E. G. Chromosomal interchanges in maize. Genetics20: 70–83. 1935.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, Irma. Structural mosaics and inheritance of variegation inBarbarea vulgaris. Jour. Genet.14: 185–195. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Babcock, E. B., andLloyd, F. E. Somatic segregation. Jour. Hered.8: 82–89. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bateson, W. Materials for the study of variation. 1894.

  5. -----. Mendel’s principles of heredity. 1909.

  6. ————— Root-cuttings, chimaeras and “sports.” Jour. Genet.6: 75–80. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baur, E. Pfropfbastarde, Periklinalchimären und Hyperchimären. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.27: 603–605. 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beijer, J. J. Über die Knospenvariationen desColeus hybridus. Genetica14: 279–318. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Belling, J. A study of semi-sterility. Jour. Hered.5: 65–73. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ————— A unique result in certain species crosses. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.39: 286–288. 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ————— A working hypothesis for segmental interchange between homologous chromosomes in flowering plants. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.14: 283–291. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benedict, R. C. The origin of new varieties ofNephrolepis by orthogenetic saltation. I. Progressive variations. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club43: 207–234. 1916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ————— Variation among the sporelings of a fertile sport of the Boston fern. Jour. Hered.15: 379–394, 421–431. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bergner, A. D., Avery, A. G., andBlakeslee, A. F. Chromosomal deficiencies inDatura stramonium induced by colchicine treatment. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 676–683. 1940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blakeslee, A. F. Mutations in mucors. Jour. Hered.11: 278–284. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ————— Genes associated with prime types inDatura and their possible relation to the hypothesis of position effect. Genetics25: 111. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boveri, Th. Über partielle Befruchtung. Sitz.-Ber. Ges. Morph. Phys. München4: 64–72. 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bridges, C. B. Deficiency. Genetics2: 445–465. 1917.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ————— Elimination of chromosomes due to a mutant (minute-N) inDrosophila melanogaster. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.11: 701–706. 1925.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. ————— Haploidy inDrosophila melanogaster. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.11: 706–710. 1925.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. ————— The Bar “gene,” a duplication. Science83: 210–211. 1936.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brink, R. A. The occurrence of semi-sterility in maize. Jour. Hered.18: 266–270. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brown, Nellie A. Sweet pea fasciation, a form of crown gall. Phytopath.17: 29–30. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Burnham, C. R. Genetical and cytological studies of semi-sterility and related phenomena in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.16: 269–277. 1930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. ————— Cytogenetic studies of an interchange between chromosomes 8 and 9 in maize. Genetics19: 430–447. 1934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cannon, W. A. A Redwood sport. Plant World11: 232–234. 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Carrière, E. A. Production et fixation des variétés dans les végétaux. 1865.

  28. Castle, W. E. On a transmissible tricolor variation in rats. Carnegie Inst. Publ.320: 51–55. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Catcheside, D. G. A position effect inOenothera. Jour. Genet.38: 345–352. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cayley, D. M. “Breaking” in tulips. Ann. Appl. Biol.15: 529–539. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chittenden, R. J. Vegetative segregation. Bib. Genet.3: 355–439. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Clark, F. J., andCopeland, F. C. Chromosome aberrations in the endosperm of maize. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 247–251. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Clausen, R. E. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. X. Carmine-coral variegation. Cytologia1: 358–368. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Collins, G. N. Mosaic coherence of characters in seeds of maize. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Plant Ind. Cir. 132. 1913.

  35. Collins, J. L. Chimeras in corn hybrids. Jour. Hered.10: 2–10. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  36. ————— A frequently mutating gene in the pineapple. Am. Nat.70: 467–476. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Correns, C. Bastarde zwischen Maisrassen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Xenien. Bibl. Bot.53: 1–161. 1901. [Reprinted in Carl Correns’ Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Vererbungswissenschaft aus periodischen Schriften. 1899–1924. 1924.]

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cramer, P. J. S. Kritische Uebersicht der bekannten Fälle von Knospenvariationen. Naturw. Verhandl. Holl. Maatsch. Weterschappen. Haarlem6. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Crane, M. B., and Lawrence, W. J. C. The genetics of garden plants. 1938.

  40. Crew, F. A. E., andLamy, Rowena. Mosaicism inDrosophila pseudoobscura. Jour. Genet.37: 211–228. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Curtis, M. R., andDunning, W. F. An independent recurrence of the blue mutation in the Norway rat and a blue-black mosaic. Jour. Hered.31: 219–222. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dahlgren, K. V. O. Eine Sektorialchimäre vom Apfel. Hereditas9: 335–342. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Demerec, M. Mutable characters ofDrosophila virilis. I. Reddish-alpha body character. Genetics13: 359–388. 1928.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. ————— Genetic factors stimulating mutability of the miniature wing character inD. virilis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.15: 834–838. 1929.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. ————— Changes in the rate of mutability of the mutable miniature gene ofD. virilis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.15: 870–876. 1929.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dobzhansky, Th. Position effects of genes. Biol. Rev.11: 364–384. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. ————— Genetic nature of species differences. Am. Nat.71: 404–420. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. -----. Genetics and the origin of species. 1937.

  49. Doncaster, L. On the relations between chromosomes, sex-limited transmission and sex-determination inAbraxas grossulariata. Jour. Genet.4: 1–21. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dubinin, N. P. A new type of position effect. Jour. Biologie5: 867–874. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  51. ————— The mechanism of the occurrence of complex chromosome rearrangements. Jour. Biologie4: 935–975. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  52. ————— Relation between the effect of the gene and its position in the system. Jour. Biologie3: 328–331. 1934. [Also Am. Nat.68: 377–381. 1934.]

    Google Scholar 

  53. —————, and ————— The position effect of the hairy gene. Jour. Biologie4: 555–568. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  54. ————— Cytogenetic study of the position effect. Jour. Biologie4: 707–720. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Duggar, B. M. Biological effects of radiation. 1936.

  56. Dunn, L. C. Analysis of a case of mosaicism in the house mouse. Jour. Genet.29: 317–326. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  57. East, E. M. Suggestions concerning certain bud variations. Plant World11: 77–83. 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  58. ————— Xenia and the endosperm of angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.56: 217–224. 1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. -----,and Hayes, H. K. Inheritance in maize. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 167. 1911.

  60. Emerson, R. A. The inheritance of a recurring somatic variation in variegated ears of maize. Neb. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 4. 1913.

  61. ————— Anomalous endosperm development in maize and the problem of bud sports. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.14: 241–259. 1915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. ————— Genetical studies of variegated pericarp in maize. Genetics2: 1–35. 1917.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. ————— Genetic evidence of aberrant chromosome behavior in maize endosperm. Am. Jour. Bot.8: 411–424. 1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. ————— The origin of variations. Am. Nat.56: 64–79. 1922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Emsweller, S. L., andBrierly, P. Colchicine-induced tetraploidy inLilium. Jour. Hered.31: 223–230. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Eyster, W. H. A genetic analysis of variegation. Genetics9: 372–404. 1924.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. ————— Mosaic pericarp in maize. Genetics10: 179–196. 1925.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Frost, H. B. Polyembryony, heterozygosis and chimeras inCitrus. Hilgardia1: 365–402. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Gardner, V. R. A study of some unproductive sports of the Montmorency cherry. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 457–478. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  70. ————— Somatic segregation in a sectorial chimera of the Bartlett pear. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 1047–1057. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gibson, R. E. Chimeras and bud sports. Trans. Ill. Hort. Soc.66: 201–211. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Giles, N. Spontaneous chromosome aberrations inTradescantia. Genetics25: 69–87. 1940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Glass, H. B. A study of dominant mosaic eye-color mutants inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Phenotypes and loci involved. Am. Nat.68: 107–114. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Goldschmidt, R. Spontaneous chromatin rearrangements and the theory of the gene. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.23: 621–623. 1937.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. -----. The material basis for evolution. 1940.

  76. Griffen, A. B., andStone, W. S. Gene position and mottling. Genetics23: 149. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Guignard, L. Sur les anthérozoides et la double copulation sexuelle chez les végétaux angiosperms. Rev. Gén. Bot.11: 129–135. [Also Comptes Rend. Acad. Sci.128: 869. 1899.]

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hefler, R. G. Two X-ray induced mosaics inDrosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.26: 3–7. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Heilborn, O. The mechanics of so-called secondary association between chromosomes. Hereditas22: 167–188. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Hintikka, T. J. Inherited witches’ brooms. Acta Forest Fennica39: 1–15. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hollander, W. F., andCole, L. J. Somatic mosaics in the domestic pigeon. Genetics25: 16–40. 1940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Hughes, A. W. M. Aphides as vectors of ‘breaking” in tulips. Ann. Appl. Biol.18: 16–29. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Hus. H. Fasciations of known causation. Am. Nat.42: 81–97. 1908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Imai, Y. Bud variation in a flaked strain ofRhododendron obtusum. Jour. Coll. Agr. Imp. Univ. Tokyo14: 93–98. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Jones, D. F. Mutation rate in somatic cells of maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.22: 645–648. 1936.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. ————— Somatic segregation and its relation to atypical growth. Genetics22: 484–522. 1937.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. ————— Translocation in relation to mosaic formation in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.24: 208–211. 1938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. ————— Variegation resulting from unequal mitosis. Genetics23: 153–154. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  89. ————— Growth changes associated with chromosome breakage and reattachment. Genetics24: 77. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  90. ————— Nuclear changes affecting growth. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 149–155. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Jones, W. N. Plant chimaeras and graft hybrids. 1934.

  92. Kaufman, B. P. Somatic mitoses ofDrosophila melanogaster. Jour. Morph.56: 125–149. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. ————— Chromosome structure in relation to the chromosome cycle. Bot. Rev.2: 529–553. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Khvostova, V. V., andGavrilova, A. A. A new method for discovering translocations. Jour. Biologie4: 905–916. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Knox, A. A. The relation of injury to fasciation in the Evening Primroses. Plant World10: 145–151. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  96. ————— The induction, development and heritability of fasciations. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ.98: 3–20. 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Kostoff, D. A chromosomal chimera in tobacco. Jour. Hered.21: 445–448. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Kraus, E. J. Bud variations in relation to fruit markings. Or. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bien. Crop Pest & Hort. Rep. 1911–1912. 1913.

  99. ————— Somatic segregation. Jour. Hered.7: 2–8. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lawrence, W. J. C. The genetics and cytology ofDahlia species. Jour. Genet.21: 125–158. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Levi, W. M., andHollander, W. F. Structural anomalies and color mosaics observed in a colony of domestic pigeons. Jour. Hered.30: 453–457. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Liese, J. Zur Bildung von Kiefern Hexenbesen. Zeits. Pilzk.19: 55. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  103. MacArthur, J. W. A spontaneous tomato chimera. Jour. Hered.19: 331–334. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  104. McClintock, B. A cytological demonstration of the location of an interchange between non-homologous chromosomes ofZea mays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.16: 791–796. 1930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. -----. Cytological observations of deficiencies involving known genes, translocations and an inversion inZea mays. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 163. 1931.

  106. ————— A correlation of ring-shaped chromosomes with variegation inZea mays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 677–681. 1932.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. ————— The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis inZea mays. Zeits. Zellf. Mikr. Anat.19: 191–237. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. -----. The fusion of broken ends of sister half-chromatids following chromatid breakage at meiotic anaphases. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 290. 1938.

  109. ————— The production of homozygous deficient tissues with mutant characteristics by means of the aberrant mitotic behavior of ring-shaped chromosomes. Genetics23: 315–376. 1938.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. ————— The behavior in successive nuclear divisions of a chromosome broken at meiosis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.25: 405–416. 1939.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Morgan, L. V. Composites ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ.399: 224–296. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  112. ————— A spontaneous somatic exchange between non-homologous chromosomes inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics24: 747–752. 1939.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Morgan, T. H., and Bridges, C. B. The origin of gynandromorphs. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 278. 1919.

  114. Muller, H. J. The production of mutations by X-rays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.14: 714–726. 1928.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Müntzing, Arne. Chromosomenaberrationen bei Pflanzen und ihre genetische Wirkung. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.76: 323–350. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Navashin, M., andGerassimova, H. Nature and causes of mutations. 1. On the nature and importance of chromosomal mutations taking place in resting plant-embryos due to their aging. Jour. Biologie4: 627–634. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Nawaschin, S. Resultate einer Revision des Befruchtungsvorgangs beiLilium Martagon undFritillaria tenelle. Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersbourg9: 1899.

  118. Painter, T. S. A new method for the study of chromomose aberrations and the plotting of chromosome maps inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics19: 175–188. 1934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Patterson, J. T. X-rays and somatic mutations. Jour. Hered.20: 260–267. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  120. ————— Somatic segregation produced by X-rays inDrosophila melanogaster. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.16: 109–111. 1930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. ————— Proof that the entire chromosome is not eliminated in the production of somatic variations by X-rays inDrosophila. Genetics15: 141–149. 1930.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. ————— The production of gynandromorphs inDrosophila melanogaster by X-rays. Jour. Exp. Zool.60: 173–203. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. ————— A new type of mottled-eyedDrosophila due to an unstable translocation. Genetics17: 38–59. 1932.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. ————— The mechanism of mosaic formation inDrosophila. Genetics18: 32–52. 1933.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. —————. The production of translocations inDrosophila. Am. Nat.68: 359–369. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Peto, F. H. Association of somatic chromosomes induced by heat and chloral hydrate treatments. Canad. Jour. Res. C.13: 301–314. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Pickard, J. N. A brown-and-black rabbit. Jour. Hered.20: 483–484. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Randolph, L. F. Some effects of high temperature on polyploidy and other variations in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 222–229. 1932.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Rhoades, M. M. A cytogenetical study of a reciprocal translocation inZea. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 1022–1031. 1933.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. ————— Effect of theDt gene on the mutability of thea 1 allele in maize. Genetics23: 377–397. 1938.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. ————— Studies of a telocentric chromosome in maize with reference to the stability of its centromere. Genetics25: 483–520. 1940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. ————— The cytogenetics of maize. Bot. Rev.1: 292–325. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Roberts, E., andQuisenberry, J. H. A Brahma-Plymouth Rock mosaic. Jour. Hered.26: 11–14; 114. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Sacharov, V. V. The character mottled (wmt) inDrosophila as a result of the “position effect”. Jour. Biologie5: 299–302. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Sax, K. An analysis of X-ray induced chromosomal aberrations inTradescantia. Genetics25: 41–68. 1940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Schultz, J. Variegation inDrosophila and the inert chromosome regions. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.22: 27–33. 1936.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. ————— The relation of a dominant eye color inDrosophila melanogaster to the associated chromosome rearrangement. Genetics19: 344–364. 1934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Serebrovsky, A. S. “Somatic segregation” in the domestic fowl. Jour. Genet.16: 33–42. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Shamel, A. D., Scott, L. B., andPomeroy, C. S. Citrus fruit improvement: a study of bud variation in the Valencia orange. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull.624: 1–120. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  140. ———— Bud mutations in horticultural crops. Jour. Hered.27: 486–494. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Shull, G. H. Variegation. Plant World11: 147–151. 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Sidky, A. R. Gonosomic mosaicism involving a lethal. Jour. Genet.39: 265–271. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Stadler, L. J. The experimental modification of heredity in crop plants. I. Induced chromosomal irregularities. II. Induced mutation. Sci. Agr.11: 557–572, 645–661. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  144. ————— On the genetic nature of induced mutations in plants. Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Genet.1: 274–294. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  145. -----. On the genetic nature of induced mutations in plants. II. A haplo-viable deficiency in maize. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 204. 1933.

  146. Stern, C. Eine neue Chromosomenaberration vonDrosophila melanogaster und ihre Bedeutung für die Theorie der linearen Anordnung der Gene. Biol. Zentralbl.46: 505–508. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  147. ————— Somatic crossing over and segregation inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics21: 625–730. 1936.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. ————— Somatic crossing over and somatic translocation. Am. Nat.73: 95–96. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Stino, K. R. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. XV. Carmine-white variegation. Jour. Hered.31: 19–24. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Stone, L. H. A. A somatic variation in the sweet pea. Jour. Genet.26: 113–114. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Stout, A. B. The establishment of varieties inColeus by the selection of somatic variations. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 218. 1915.

  152. Sturtevant, A. H. The effects of unequal crossing over at the bar locus inDrosophila. Genetics10: 117–147. 1925.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. ————— A further study of so-called mutation at the bar locus inDrosophila. Genetics13: 401–409. 1928.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. ————— The claret mutant type ofDrosophila simulans: A Study of chromosome elimination and of cell-lineage. Zeits. Wiss. Zool.135: 323–356. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  155. ————— Contributions to the genetics of certain chromosome anomalies inDrosophila melanogaster. III. Two new attached-X lines ofDrosophila melanogaster and further data on the behavior of heterozygous attached-X’s. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ.421: 61–81. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  156. ————— The use of mosaics in the study of the developmental effect of genes. Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Genet.1: 304–307. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Toxopeus, H. J. Some cases of bud-variation inCitrus observed in Java. Genetica15: 241–252. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Webber, H. J. Xenia, or the immediate effect of pollen in maize. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Physiol. & Path. Bull.22: 1–44. 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Whiting, P. W. Diploid mosaics inHabrobracon. Am. Nat.66: 75–81. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Winkler, H. Über Pfropfbastarde und pflanzliche Chimären. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.25: 568–576. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Wright, S., andEaton, O. N. Mutational mosaic coat patterns of the guinea pig. Genetics11: 333–351. 1926.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven

    Donald F. Jones

Authors
  1. Donald F. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, D.F. Somatic segregation. Bot. Rev 7, 291–307 (1941). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872462

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872462

Keywords

Search

Navigation