Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gene segregation in autotetraploids. II

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Alcarez, M. E., andTamayo, A. I. La tetraploidia inducida por la colchicina en el generoNicotiana. Genetica Iberica2: 295–322. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, J. M. Cytological studies in alfalfa polyploids. Canad. Jour. Bot.32: 531–542. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atwood, S. S. The behavior of oppositional alleles in polyploids ofTrifolium repens. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.30: 69–79. 1944.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. —————andBrewbaker, J. L. Incompatibility in autoploid white clover. Cornell Univ. Mem.319: 1–52. 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  5. —————andGrun, P. Cytogenetics of alfalfa. Bib. Genet.14: 133–188. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bateman, A. J. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. III. Cruciferae. Heredity9: 53–68. 1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett, J. H. Panmixia with tetrasomic and hexasomic inheritance. Genetics39: 150–158. 1954.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bishop, C. J. The genetical basis of sterility in tetraploid broccoli. Genetics32: 79. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bolton, J. L., andGreenshields, J. E. R. A diploid form ofMedicago sativa L. Science112: 275–277. 1950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brewbaker, J. L. Oppositional allelism in diploid and tetraploid alsike clover. Genetics36: 542. 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ————— Oppositional allelism in diploid and autotetraploidTrifolium hybridum L. Genetics38: 444–455. 1953.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ————— Incompatibility in autotetraploidTrifolium repens L. I. Competition and self-compatibility. Genetics39: 307–316. 1954.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. ————— Incompatibility in autotetraploid white clover. II. Dominance and double reduction. Genetics40: 137–152. 1955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. —————, and Atwood, S. S. Incompatibility alleles in polyploids. Proc. VI Int. Grassl. Congr. Vol. 1: 267–272. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brown, W. V., Ponewczynski, H. J., andScarborough, H. H. Jr. A cytological study ofTradescantia reverchoni Bush. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club78: 66–69. 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cadman, C. H. Nature of tetraploidy in cultivated European potatoes. Nature152: 103–104. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crane, M. B., andLawrence, W. J. C. The genetics of garden plants. 4th ed. 1952.

  18. Dudley, J. W., andWilsie, C. P. Inheritance of branched inflorescence and vestigial flower in alfalfa,Medicago sativa L. Agron. Jour.48: 47–50. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ————— and ————— Inheritance of branched raceme and vestigial flower in alfalfa. Agron. Jour.49: 320–323. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Einset, J. Aneuploidy in relation to partial sterility in autotetraploid lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Am. Jour. Bot.34: 99–105. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fineman, Z. N. Inheritance of two types of pollen sterility in the potato. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minn. 1943.

  22. ————— Elimination and retention of pollen sterility in potato improvement. Jour. Agr. Res.75: 135–145. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher, R. A. Allowance for double reduction in the calculation of genotype frequencies with polysomic inheritance. Ann. Eugenics12: 169–171. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ————— The theory of linkage in polysomic inheritance. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B.233: 55–87. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ----- The linkage problem in a tetrasomic wild plant,Lythrum salicaria. Proc. VIII Int. Congr. Genet. Hereditas, Suppl. Vol. 225–233. 1949.

  26. —————, andFyfe, V. C. Double reduction at the Rosy, or Pink, locus inLythrum salicaria. Nature176: 1176. 1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Geiringer, H. Chromatid segregation in tetraploids and hexaploids. Genetics34: 665–684. 1949.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. ————— Contribution to the linkage theory of autopolyploids. I. and II. Bull. Math. Biophys.11: 59–82, 197–219. 1949.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilles, A., andRandolph, L. F. Reduction of quadrivalent frequency in autotetraploid maize during a period of ten years. Am. Jour. Bot.38: 12–17. 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Grun, P. Variations in the meiosis of alfalfa. Am. Jour. Bot.38: 475–482. 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Haldane, J. B. S. The theoretical genetics of autopolyploids. Jour. Genet.22: 359–373. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hawthorne, D. C. The use of linear asci for chromosome mapping inSaccharomyces. Genetics40: 511–518. 1955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hecht, A. Induced tetraploids of a self-sterileOenothera. Genetics29: 69–74. 1944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. ————— Tetraploid ratios of self sterility alleles: a correction. Genetics34: 685–686. 1949.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Howard, H. W. Self-incompatibility in polyploid forms ofBrassica andRaphanus. Nature149: 302. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Huijsman, C. A. Breeding for resistance to potato root eelworm. II. Data on inheritance inandigenum-tuberosum crosses obtained in 1954. Euphytica4: 133–140. 1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hutton, E. M. Possible genotypes conditioning virus resistance in the potato and tomato. Jour. Aust. Inst. Agr. Sci.17: 132–138. 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Janick, J. Inheritance of sex in tetraploid spinach. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., Proc.66: 361–363. 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  39. —————, andStevenson, E. C. The effects of polyploidy on sex expression in spinach. Genetics39: 974–975. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  40. —————and————— The effects of polyploidy on sex expression in spinach. Jour. Hered.46: 150–156. 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kadota, T., andIto, K. Improvement of fertility and inaction of self-incompatibility in the progenies of autotetraploid in Chinese cabbage. Jap. Jour. Breed.1: 151–155. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kedharnath, S., andParthasarathy, N. Varietal differences in the breeding behavior of colchicine-induced autotetraploids of chili (Capsicum anuum L.) Indian Jour. Genet. & Plant Breed.10: 14–20. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Krantz, F. A. Potato breeding methods. III. A suggested procedure for potato breeding. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 173. 1946.

  44. —————, andFineman, Z. M. Incidence and inheritance of pollen sterility in the potato. Jour. Agr. Res.58: 593–601. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Leupold, U., andHottinguer, H. Some data on segregation inSaccharomyces. Heredity8: 243–258. 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lewis, D. Physiology of incompatibility in plants. III. Autopolyploids. Jour. Genet.45: 171–185. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  47. ————— Competition and dominance of incompatibility alleles in diploid pollen. Heredity1: 85–108. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. ————— Incompatibility in flowering plants. Biol. Rev.24: 472–496. 1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. ————— andModlibowska, I. Genetical studies in pears. IV. Pollen tube growth and incompatibility. Jour. Genet.43: 211–222. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li, C. C. The genetic variance of autotetraploids with two alleles. Genetics42: 583–592. 1957.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lindegren, C. C. Chromosome maps ofSaccharomyces. Proc. VIII Int. Congr. Genet. Hereditas Suppl. Vol. 338–355. 1949.

  52. ————— Gene conversion inSaccharomyces. Jour. Genet.51: 625–637. 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. —————, andLindegren G. TetraploidSaccharomyces. Jour. Gen. Microbiol.5: 885–893. 1951.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. —————, —————, andBrenes-Pomales, A. Genetical analysis of the clones from a single tetrad ofSaccharomyces showing non-Mendelian segregation. Genetica28: 1–24. 1956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Little, T. M. Autotetraploid segregation inAntirrhinum majus. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Maryland. 1943.

  56. ————— Gene segregation in autotetraploids. Bot. Rev.11: 60–85. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Livermore, J. R., andJohnstone, F. E. The effect of chromosome doubling on the crossability ofSolanum chacoense, S. Jamesii andS. bulbocastanum withS. tuberosum. Amer. Potato Jour.17: 169–173. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lunden, A. P. Undersokelser over reaksjon mot kreft (Synchytrium endobioticum) hos potet. Meld Norges Landbrukshogskole137:48. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lundquist, A. On self-sterility and inbreeding effect in tetraploid rye. Hereditas33: 570–571. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  60. ————— Self-incompatibility in rye. II. Genetic control in the tetraploid. Hereditas43: 467–511. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mather, K. Segregation and linkage in autotetraploids. Jour. Genet.32: 287–314. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Morinaga, T. How characters segregate in autotetraploids. La Kromosomo9/10: 348–355. 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Muller, H. J. A new mode of segregation in Gregory’s tetraploidPrimulas. Am. Nat.48: 508–512. 1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Nordenskiöld, Hedda. A genetical study in the mode of segregation in hexaploidPhleum pratense. Hereditas39: 469–488. 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. —————. Segregation ratios in progenies of hybrids between natural and synthesizedPhleum pratense. Hereditas43: 525–540. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Oomen, H. C. J. Polyploidy inCanna. Genetica24: 333–386. 1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Paddock, E. F. The theoretical advantage of using autotetraploids in crop plant breeding. Am. Jour. Bot.33: 222. 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Pandy, K. K. Incompatibility in autotetraploidTrifolium pratense. Genetics41: 353–366. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Pirschle, K. Quantitative Untersuchungen über Wachstum und “Ertrag” autopolyploider Pflanzen. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.80: 126–156. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Pomper, S., Daniels, K. M., andMcKee, D. W. Genetic analysis of polyploid yeast. Genetics39: 343–355. 1954.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Randolph, L. F. Cytogenetics of tetraploid maize. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 591–605. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ranganathan, B., andSubramaniam, M. K. Studies on the cytology of yeasts. VI. Lethal chromosomal mutations in yeast. Jour. Indian Inst. Sci.34: 235–251. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Roman, H. Polyploidy and phenotypic ratios inSaccharomyces. Genetics37: 620. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  74. —————, andDouglas, H. C. Polyploidy in yeast and its bearing on the occurrence of irregular genetic ratios. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.37: 79–84. 1951.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. —————, andSands, S. M. Studies of polyploidSaccharomyces. I. Tetraploid segregation. Genetics40: 546–562. 1955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Sacharov, V. V., Frolova, S. L., andMansurova, V. V. High fertility of buckwheat tetraploids obtained by means of colchicine treatment. Nature154: 613. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Shibata, K. Studies on self- and cross-incompatibility in the artificial autotetraploids ofBrassica pekinensis. I. Results of the primary and secondary crosses based on the four different strains with perfectly homozygous genotype for oppositional genes. Jap. Jour. Genet.30: 211–217. 1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. —————. II. Gene analysis in the offspring originated from several secondary crosses. Jap. Jour. Genet.31: 22–29. 1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Soost, R. K. Gene dosage effect of theWo gene in tomato. Genetics39: 995. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Stanford, E. H. Tetrasomic inheritance in alfalfa. Agron. Jour.43: 222–225. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Stebbins, G. L. Variation and evolution in plants. 1950.

  82. -----. Types of polyploids: their classification and significance. Adv. Genet. 1: 403–429.

  83. Stout, A. B. Inactivation of incompatibilities in tetraploid progenies ofPetunia axillaris. Torreya44: 45–51. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  84. —————, andChandler, C. Change from self-incompatibility to self-compatibility accompanying change from diploidy to tetraploidy. Science94: 118. 1941.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Straub, J. Die Beseitigung der Selbststerilität durch Polyploidisierung. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.59: 296–304. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  86. —————. Zur Entwicklungsphysiologie der Selbststerilität beiPetunia. Zeit. Naturforsch.1: 287–291. 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Subramaniam, M. K. Tetraploidy in yeasts. Cellule54: 145–148. 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Swaminathan, M. S. Notes on induced polyploids in the tuber-bearingSolanum species and their crossability withS. tuberosum. Amer. Potato Jour.28: 472–489. 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. -----. Species differentiation and the nature of polyploidy in certain species of the genusSolanum sect.Tuberarium. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Cambridge, England. 1952.

  90. ————— Nature of polyploidy in some 48-chromosome species of the genusSolanum sectionTuberarium. Genetics39: 59–76. 1954.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. ————— and Howard, H. W. The cytology and genetics of the potato (Solanum tuberosum) and related species. Bib. Genet.16: 1–192. 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Tanaka, M. Studies on artificially induced polyploid eggplants. I. Tetraploid eggplants induced by colchicine method. Seiken Ziho4: 59–65. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Torka, M. Zur Selbststerilität vonSolanum chacoense Bitt. Zeits. Pflanzenz.30: 309–314. 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Toxopeus, H. J., andHuijsman, C. A. Breeding for resistance to potato root eelworm. I. Preliminary data concerning the inheritance and the nature of resistance. Euphytica2: 180–186. 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Twamley, B. E. Flower color inheritance in diploid and tetraploid alfalfa. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Saskatchewan. 1952.

  96. Tysdal, H. M., Kiesselbach, T. A., andWestover, H. L. Alfalfa breeding. Nebr. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 124. 1942.

  97. Welch, J. E. Linkage in autotetraploid maize. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell Univ. 1942.

  98. Winge, O., andRoberts, C. Non-Mendelian segregation from heterozygotic yeast asci. Nature165: 157. 1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. —————and————— Causes of deviations from 2:2 segregations in the tetrads of monohybrid yeasts. Compt. Rend. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg, Ser. Physiol.25: 285–329. 1954.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. —————and————— Remarks on irregular segregations inSaccharomyces. Genetica28: 489–496. 1957.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Riverside

    Thomas M. Little

Authors
  1. Thomas M. Little
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Little, T.M. Gene segregation in autotetraploids. II. Bot. Rev 24, 318–339 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872438

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872438

Keywords

Search

Navigation