Cytology in its relation to taxonomy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Edgar. 1931. Internal factors affecting discontinuity between species. Amer. Nat.65: 144–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. —. 1936. The species problem inIris. I to V. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.23: 457–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. —,And Karl Sax. 1935. Chromosome numbers in the Hamamelidaceae and their phylogenetic significance. Tour. Arn. Arb.16: 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ——. 1936. A cytological monograph of the American species ofTradescantia. Bot. Gaz.97: 433–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. —,And Robert E. Woodson. 1935. The species ofTradescantia indigenous to the United States. Contr. Arn. Arb.9: 1–132, 12 PI.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Babcock, Ernest Brown. 1936. The origin ofCrepis and related genera. Essays in Geobotany in Honor of William Albert Setchell, Univ. Calif. Press. pp. 9–53.

  7. -. 1936. The cytogenetic-phylogenetic approach to specific and generic limitation. A. A. A. S., St. Louis meeting,1935–1936.

  8. —,And Donald R. Cameron. 1934. Chromosomes and phytogeny inCrepis. IL The relationships of one hundred eight species. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agri. Sci.6: 287–324.

    Google Scholar 

  9. —,And M. Navashin. 1930. The genusCrepis. Biblio. Genet.6: 1–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer, Hans. 1936. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Morphologie der Speicheldrüsenchromosomen. Zool. Jahrb.56: 239–276.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruun, H. G. 1932. Cytological studies inPrimula, with special reference to the relation between karyology and taxonomy of the genus. Symb. Bot. Upsali.1: 1–239.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clausen, J. 1931. Cyto-genetic and taxonomic investigations on melanium violets. Hereditas15: 219–308.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clausen, J. 1933. Cytological evidence for the hybrid origin ofPentstemon neotericus Keck. Hereditas18: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dobzhansky, Th. 1937. Personal communication.

  15. —,And C. C. Tan. 1936. Studies on hybrid sterility. III. A comparison of the gene arrangement in two species,Drosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila miranda. Zeit. Induk. Abst. Vererb72: 88–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Erlanson, E. W. 1934. Experimental data for a revision of the North American wild roses. Bot. Gaz.96: 197–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernald, M. L. 1925. Persistence of plants in unglaciated areas of boreal America. Mem. Amer. Acad. Arts & Sci.15: 244.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gaiser, L. O. 1930. Chromosome numbers in angiosperms. II. Biblio Genet.6: 171–466.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goodspeed, T. H. 1934.Nicotiana phylesis in the light of chromosome number, morphology, and behavior. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.17: 369–398.

    Google Scholar 

  20. —,And R. E. Clausen. 1928. Interspecific hybridization inNicotiana. VIII. Thesylvestris-tomentosa-tabacum hybrid triangle and its bearing on the origin oftabacum. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot11: 775–844.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hagerup, O. 1928. Morphological and cytological studies ofBicornes. Dansk Bot. Arkiv.61: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hakansson, Artur. 1928. Die Chromosomen einiger Scirpoideen. Hereditas10: 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heilborn, Otto. 1924. Chromosome numbers and dimensions, speciesformation and phylogeny in the genusCarex. Hereditas5: 129–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. —. 1932. Aneuploidy and polyploidy inCarex. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.26: 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hicks, G. Claude. 1928. Chromosome studies in the Cyperaceae, with special reference toScirpus. Bot. Gaz.86: 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huskins, C. Leonard. 1931. The origin ofSpartina Townsendii. Genetica12: 531–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hutchinson, J. 1934. The families of flowering plants. II. Monocotyledons. Macmillan & Co., London, 243 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnston, I. M. 1924. Studies in the Boraginaceae. III. Contr. Gray Herb. Harvard Univ.73: 42–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Keck, D. D. 1932. Studies inPentstemon. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.16: 367–426.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Machatschki-Laurich, B. 1926. Die Arten der GattungBiscutella L. SectioThlaspidium (Med.). DC. Bot. Arch.13: 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Manton, Irene. 1932. Introduction to the general cytology of the Cruciferae. Ann. Bot.46: 509–554.

    Google Scholar 

  32. —. 1934. The problem ofBiscutella laevigata L. Zeit. Indukt. Abst. Vererb.67: 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsuura, Hajime, And Tiharu Sutô. 1935. Contributions to the idiogram study in phanerogamous plants. I. Jour. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. V.5: 33–75.

    Google Scholar 

  34. McKelvey, Susan Delano, And Karl Sax. 1933. Taxonomic and cytological relationships ofYucca andAgave. Jour. Arn. Arb.14: 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Müntzing, Arne. 1935. Cyto-genetic studies on hybrids between twoPhleum species. Hereditas20: 103–136.

    Google Scholar 

  36. —. 1936. The evolutionary significance of auto-polyploidy. Hereditas21: 263–378.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Newton, W. C. F., And Caroline Pellew. 1929.Primula kewensis and its derivatives. Jour. Genet.20: 405–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rüttle, Mabel L. (Mrs. Nebel). 1931. Cytological and embryological studies on the genusMentha. Gartenbauwissenschaft4: 428–468.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sax, Hally Jolivette. 1930. Chromosome numbers inQuercus. Jour. Arn. Arb.11: 220–223.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sax, Karl. 1930. Chromosome stability in the genusRhododendron. Amer. Jour. Bot.17: 247–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. —. 1931. The origin and relationship of the Pomoideae. Jour. Arn. Arb.12: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  42. —,And J. M. Beal. 1934. Chromosomes of the Cycadales. Jour. Arn. Arb.15: 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  43. —,And Hally Jolivette Sax. 1933. Chromosome number and morphology in the conifers. Jour. Arn. Arb.14: 356–375.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schiemann, E. 1932. Entstehung der Kulturpflanzen. Handbuch der Vererbungswissenschaft3: 1–377.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shimotomai, N. 1933. Zur Karyogenetik der GattungChrysanthemum. Jour. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. B, div. 2.21: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Simonet, Marc. 1929. Le nombre des chromosomes chez lesIrís. Jour. Soc. Nat. Hort. France Février1929: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  47. —. 1934. Nouvelles Recherches cytologiques et génétiques chez lesIris. Thèses Fac. Sci. Paris15: 229–383.

    Google Scholar 

  48. —. 1935. Conjugaison autosyndétique des chromosomes à la méiose de quelques hybrides interspécifiquesd’Iris. Bull. Biol. France et Belgique.69: 176–212.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Skovsted, A. 1934. Cytological studies in the tribe Saxifrageae. Dansk Bot. Arkiv85: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smith, Lyman B. 1934. Geographical evidence on the lines of evolution in the Bromeliaceae. Bot. Jahrb.66: 446–468.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Smith, Stanley G. 1932. Cytology ofAnchusa and its relation to the taxonomy of the genus. Bot. Gaz.94: 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Smith, Sir William Wright. 1933. The Hooker lecture. Some aspects of the bearing of cytology on taxonomy. Proc. Linn. Soc. London145: 151–181.

    Google Scholar 

  53. —. 1936. Masters lectures, 1935. Problems in classification of plants. Jour. Roy. Hort. Soc.61: 77–90, 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stockwell, Palmer. 1935. Chromosome numbers of some of the Cactaceae. Bot. Gaz.96: 565–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tischler, G. 1935–36. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tab. Biolog. Period.5: 281–304,6: 57–115.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Webber, J. M. 1936. Chromosomes inSphaeralcea and related genera. Cytologia7: 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Whitaker, Thomas W. 1933. Chromosome number and relationship in the Magnoliales. Jour. Arn. Arb.14: 376–385.

    Google Scholar 

  58. —. 1934. Chromosome constitution in certain Monocotyledons. Jour. Arn. Arb.15: 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wodehouse, R. P. 1935. Pollen Grains. McGraw-Hill Co.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, E. Cytology in its relation to taxonomy. Bot. Rev 3, 335–350 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872347

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chromosome Number
  • Botanical Review
  • Diploid Species
  • Cytological Study
  • Base Number