Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent work on photoperiodism

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Allard, H. A. Response of the woody plantsHibiscus syriacus, Malvaviscus conzattii andBuginvillea glabra to length of day. Jour. Agr. Res.51: 27–341 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bogdanoff, P. L. Photoperiodism in species of woody plants: preliminary contribution. Mitt. Staatsinst. Wiss. Forsch. U. Holzind. 21–55. 1931.

  3. Cajlachjan, M. Ch. Yarovization of plants by the action of light. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. U. R. S. S.5: 224–229. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —. On the mechanism of photoperiodic reaction. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U. R. S. S.1(10): 89–93. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  5. —. On the hormonal theory of plant development. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U. R. S. S.3(13): 443–447. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  6. —. New facts in support of the hormonal theory of plant development. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U. R. S. S.4(13): 79–83. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  7. —And Alexandrovskaja, V. A. The nature of the aftereffect (induction) and the effect of the length of day on the activity of the oxidizing enzymes. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. U. R. S. S.2: 161–166. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chroboczek, E. A study of some ecological factors influencing seedstalk development in beetsBeta vulgaris L. N. Y. Cornell Agr.Exp. Sta. Mem.154: 84 p. 1934.

  9. Darrow, G. M. and Waldo, G. F. Responses of strawberry varieties and species to duration of the daily light period. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull.453: 31 p. 1934.

  10. Evans, M. W. And Allard, H. A. Relation of length of day to growth of timothy. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 571–586. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Funke, G. L. Proeven over photoperiodiciteit bij verschillend gekleurd licht. Biol. Jaarbk. Natuurwetenschap. Genootschap Dodonaea (Gent)3: 225–247. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaertner, T. von And Braunroth, E. Über den Einfluss des Mondlichtes auf den Blühterm in der Lang- und Kurztagpflanzen. Bot. Centbl., Beihefte, Abt. A.53: 554–563. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garner, W. W. And Allard, H. A. Further studies in photoperiodism, the response of the plant to relative length of day and night. Jour. Agr. Res.23: 871–920. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  14. —. Comparative responses of long-day and short-day plants to relative length of day and night. Plant Physiol.8: 347–356. 1933.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. —. Photoperiodism.In Duggar, B. M., Biological effects of radiation.2: 677–713. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hackbarth, J. Versuche über Photoperiodismus bei südamerikanischen Kartoffelklonen. Züchter7: 95–104. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kellerman, K. F. A review of the discovery of photoperiodism; the influence of the length of daily light periods upon the growth of plants. Quart. Rev. Biol.1: 87–94. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knott, J. E. Effect of a localized photoperiod on spinach. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc.31: 152–154. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kopetz, L. Untersuchungen über den Einfluss des Lichtfaktors auf Wachstum und Entwicklung einiger sommerannueller Pflanzen. Gartenbauwiss.10: 354–378. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kramer, Paul J. Effect of variation in length of day on growth and dormancy of trees. Plant Physiol.11: 127–137. 1936.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lebedinceva, E. Significance of the day length for the earing of winter cereals. Bull. Appl. Bot., Gen. & Plant Breeding, III., Phys., Biochem. & Anat. Plants3: 141–154. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lubimenko, V. N. And Sceglova, O. A. Nouvelles données expérimentales sur l’induction photopériodique. Acta Inst. Bot. Acad. Sci. U. R. S. S.4: 109–133. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McKinney, H. H. And Sando, W. J. Earliness of sexual reproduction in wheat as influenced by temperature and light in relation to growth phases. Jour. Agr. Res.51: 621–641. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moshkov, B. S. Photoperiodismus and frosthärte ausdauernder Gewächse. Planta, Arch. Wiss. Bot., III, Phys., Biochem. & Anat. Plants6: 235–261. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murneek, A. E. and Gomez, E. T. Influence of length of day (photoperiod) on development of the soybean plant, var. Biloxi. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull.242: 28 p. 1936.

  26. Purvis, O. N. An analysis of the influence of temperature during germination on the subsequent development of certain winter cereals and its relation to the effect of length of day. Ann. Bot.48: 919–955. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rasumov, V. Influence of alternate day length on tuber formation. Bull. Appl. Bot., Gen. & Plant Breeding27: 3–46. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  28. —. On the localization of photoperiodical stimulation. Bull. Appl. Bot., Gen. & Plant Breeding27: 249–282. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  29. —. The significance of the quality of light in photoperiodical response. Bull. Appl. Bot., Gen. and Plant Breeding. III. Phys., Biochem. & Anat. Plants3: 217–251. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Redington, G. The effect of the duration of light upon the growth and development of the plant. Biol. Rev. & Biol. Proc. Philos. Soc.4: 180–208. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rhind, D. A note on photoperiodism in Sesamum. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.5: 729–736. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rudorf, W. Untersuchungen über den Einfluss veränderter Tageslängen auf Sorten von Sojabohnen (Soja hispida Moench) und Buschbohnen (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Zts. Zücht. A, Pflanzenzucht,20: 251–267. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schappelle, N. A. Effect of narrow ranges of wave-lengths of radiant energy, and other factors, on the reproductive growth of long-day and short-day plants. N. Y. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta. Mem.185: 33 p. 1936.

  34. Schick, R. Photoperiodismus (Sammelreferat). Züchter4: 122–135. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Steinberg, R. A. And Garner, W. W. Response of certain plants to length of day and temperature under controlled conditions. Jour.Agr. Res.52: 943–960. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Werner, H. O. The effect of a controlled nitrogen supply with different temperatures and photoperiods upon the development of thepotato plant. Nebr. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull.75: 132 p. 1934.

  37. Withrow, R. B. And Benedict, H. M. Photoperiodic responses of certain greenhouse annuals as influenced by intensity and wave length of artificial light used to lengthen the daily period. Plant Physiol.11: 225–249. 1936.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. —And Biebel, J. P. Photoperiodic response of certain long and short-day plants to filtered radiation applied as a supplement to daylight. Plant Physiol.11: 807–819. 1936.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zimmerman, P. W. And Hitchcock, A. E. The localization of the mechanism which regulates tuberization in plants. Amer. Jour. Bot.23: 690. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, USA

    W. W. Garner

Authors
  1. W. W. Garner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garner, W.W. Recent work on photoperiodism. Bot. Rev 3, 259 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872312

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872312

Keywords

Search

Navigation