Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physiologic specialization of the parasitic fungi

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Aamodt, O. S. Varietal trials, physiologic specialization, and breeding spring wheats for resistance toTilletia tritici andT.1evis. Canadian Jour. Res.5: 501–528. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allison, C. C., And Isenbeck, K. Biologische Spezialisierung vonPuccinia glumarum tritici Eriksson und Henning. Phytopath. Zeits.2: 87–98. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arthur, J. C. Cultures of Uredineae in 1909. Mycologia2: 213–240. 1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, D. L. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia graminis avenae Erikss. and Henn. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull.35: 1–36. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blumer, S. Beiträge zur Spezialisation derErysiphe horridula Lév. auf Boraginaceen. Centralbl. Bakt., Abt. 2,55: 480–506. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bressman, E. N. Varietal resistance, physiologic specialization, and inheritance studies in bunt of wheat. Ore. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.281: 1–44. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, A. M. Investigations of the dwarf leaf rust of barley (Puccinia anomala). Rep. Dominion Botanist, Dom. Can. Dept. Agr.1930: 56, 57. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Budde, A. Ueber Rassenbildung parasitischer Pilze unter besonderer Berücksichtigung vonColletotrichum Lindemuthianum (Sacc. et Magn.) Bri. et Cav. in Deutschland. Forsch. Gebiet Pflanzenkr. u. Immunität im Pflanzenreich5: 115–147. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christensen, J. J. Studies on the genetics ofUstilago zeae. Phytopath. Zeits.4: 129–188. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christensen, J. J., And Graham, T. W. Physiologic specialization and variation inHelminthosporium gramineum Rab. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull.95: 1–40. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  11. —,And Stakman, E. C. Physiologic specialization and mutation inUstilago zeae. Phytopath.16: 979–999. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciferri, R. Osservazioni sulla specializzazione dell’Albugo ipomoeaepanduratoe (Schw.) Sw. Nuov. Giorn. Bot. Ital.35: 112–134. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cotter, R. U., And Levine, M. N. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia graminis secalis. Jour. Agr. Res.45: 297–315. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dodoff, D. N. Physiological forms of leaf rust of wheat (Puccinia triticina Erikss.) in Bulgaria. Zemledelska Misal. (Sofia)2: 1–34. 1931. (In Bulgarian; English summary.)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eriksson, J. Über die Specialisierung des Parasitismus bei den Getreiderostpilzen. Ber. deut. bot. Gesell.12: 292–331. 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Faris, J. A. Factors influencing the infection of wheat byTilletia tritici andTilletia laevis. Mycologia16: 259–282. 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. —. Physiological specialization ofUstilago hordei. Phytopath.14: 537–557. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flor, H. H. Studies on physiologic specialization inTilletia tritici andT. levis in the Pacific Northwest. Jour. Agr. Res.47: 193–213. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frenzel, H. Beiträge zur Spezialisierung des HaferkronenrostesPuccinia coronifera f. sp.avenae Kleb. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.18: 153–176. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gaines, E. F. New physiologic forms ofTilletia levis andT. tritici. Phytopath.18: 579–588. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  21. —,And Smith, W. K. Reaction of varieties and hybrids of wheat to physiologic forms of bunt. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.25: 273–284. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gäumann, E. Beiträge zu einer Monographie der GattungPeronospora Corda. Beit. z. Kryptogamenflora5 (4): 1–360. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gordon, W. L. Effect of temperature on host reactions to physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis avenae, Erikss. & Henn. Scient. Agr.11: 95–103. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  24. —. A study of the relation of environment to the development of the uredinial and telial stages of the physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis avenae Erikss. and Henn. Scient. Agr.14: 184–237. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goulden, C. H., Newton, M., And Brown, A. M. The reaction of wheat varieties at two stages of maturity to sixteen physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Scient. Agr.11: 9–25. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grevel, F. K. Untersuchungen über das Vorhandensein biologischer Rassen des Flugbrandes des Weizens (Ustilago tritici). Phytopath. Zeits.2: 209–234. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hammarlund, C. Zur Genetik, Biologie und Physiologie einiger Erysiphaceen. Hereditas6: 1–126. 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harrington, J. B. The effect of temperature on the expression of factors governing rust reaction in a cross between two varieties ofTriticum vulgare. Canadian Jour. Res.5: 200–207. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hey, A. Beiträge zur Spezialisierung des Gerstenzwergrostes,Puccinia simplex Erikss. et Henn. Arb. Biolog. Reichs.19: 227–261. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoerner, G. R. Biologic forms ofPuccinia coronata on oats. Phytopath.9: 309–314. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Holton, C. S. The relation of physiologic specialization inTilletia to recent epiphytotics of bunt in durum and Marquis wheats. Phytopath.21: 687–694. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson, T. A study of the effect of environmental factors on the variability of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici Erikss. and Henn. Dom. Can. Dept. Agr. Bull.140: 1–76. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  33. —,Newton, M., And Brown, A. M. Further studies of the inheritance of spore colour and pathogenicity in crosses between physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Scient. Agr.14: 360–373. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Johnston, C. O. An aberrant physiologic form ofPuccinia triticina Eriks. Phytopath.20: 609–620. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  35. —,And Mains, E. B. Studies on physiologic specialization inPuccinia triticina. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull.313: 1–23. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Levine, M. N. Biometrical studies on the variation of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici and the effects of ecological factors on the susceptibility of wheat varieties. Phytopath.18: 7–126. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  37. —,And Stakman, E. C. Physiologic specialization ofPuccinia graminis secalis. Phytopath.13: 35. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mains, E. B. Host specialization of barley leaf rust,Puccinia anomala. Phytopath.20: 873–882. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  39. —. Host specialization ofErysiphe graminis tritici. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 49–53. 1933.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. —. Host specialization in the leaf rust of grasses,Puccinia rubigo-vera. Papers, Mich. Acad. Sci.17: 289–394. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  41. —. Inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew,Erysiphe graminis tritici, in wheat. Phytopath.24: 1257–1261. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  42. —,And Dietz, S. M. Physiologic forms of barley mildew,Erysiphe graminis hordei Marchai. Phytopath.20: 229–239. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  43. —,And Jackson, H. S. Physiologic specialization in the leaf rust of wheat,Puccinia triticina Eriks. Phytopath.16: 89–120. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  44. McDonald, J. The existence of physiologic forms of wheat stem rust in Africa. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.15: 235–247. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Melchers, L. E. Investigations on physiologic specialization ofTilletia laevis in Kansas. Phytopath.24: 1203–1226. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  46. —,Ficke, C. H., And Johnston, C. O. A study of the physiologic forms of kernel smut (Sphacelotheca sorghi) of sorghum. Jour. Agr. Res.44: 1–11. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Murphy, H. C. Physiological specialization and parasitism of crown rust of oats. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Rep. 1933: 45, 46.

  48. Newton, M., And Johnson, T. Color mutations inPuccinia graminis tritici (Pers.) Erikss. & Henn. Phytopath.17: 711–725. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  49. ——. Specialization and hybridization of wheat stem rust,Puccinia graminis tritici, in Canada. Dom. Can. Dept. Agr. Bull.160: 1–60. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  50. ——,And Brown, A. M. A preliminary study of the hybridization of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Scient. Agr.10: 721–731. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  51. ———. A study of the inheritance of spore colour and pathogenicity in crosses between physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Scient. Agr.10: 775–798. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nicolaisen, W. Beitrag zur Immunitätszüchtung des Hafers gegenUstilago avenae (Pers.) Jens. Zeits. für Züchtung, A,16: 255–278. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  53. —. Die Grundlagen der Immunitätszüchtung gegenUstilago avenae (Pers.) Jens. Zeits. für Züchtung, A,19: 1–56. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Parson, H. E. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia coronata avenae. Phytopath.17: 783–790. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Peturson, B. Effect of temperature on host reactions to physiologic forms ofPuccinia coronata avenae. Scient. Agr.11: 104–110. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Peuser, H. Fortgesetzte Untersuchungen über das Vorkommen biologischer Rassen vonColletotrichum lindemuth. (Sacc. et Magn.) Bri. et Cav. Phytopath. Zeits.4: 83–112. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Pfister, R. Zur Biologie vonCystopus Tragopogonis Pers. Centralbl. Bakt., Abt. 2,71: 312, 313. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Radulescu, E. Zur physiologischen Spezialisierung des Weizenbraunrostes (Puccinia triticina Erikss). Kühn-Archiv.33: 195–205. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Reed, George M. Physiological specialization of parasitic fungi. Brooklyn Bot. Gard. Mem.1: 348–409. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  60. —. Physiologic races of oat smuts. Amer. Jour. Bot.11: 483–492. 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. —. Further evidence of physiologic races of oat smuts. Mycologia19: 21–28. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. —. Plant pathology. Brooklyn Bot. Gard. Rec.16: 37–45. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  63. —. Physiologic races of bunt of wheat. Amer. Jour. Bot.15: 157–170. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. —. New physiologic races of the oat smuts. Torrey Bot. Club Bull.56: 449–470. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. —,And Stanton, T. R. Physiologic races ofUstilago levis andU. Avenae on red oats. Jour. Agr. Res.44: 147–153. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  66. —,Swabey, Marjorie, And Kolk, Laura A. Experimental studies on head smut of corn and sorghum. Torrey Bot. Club Bull.54: 295–310. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Reichert, I. Comparative bunt resistance of wheat in Palestine. Zionist Organ. Inst. Agr. Nat. Hist., Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.9: 1–29. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  68. —. A new strain ofTillelia tritici in Palestine. Ann. Appl. Biol.17: 720–724. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rodenhiser, H. A., And Stakman, E. C. Physiologic specialization inTilletia levis andTilletia tritici. Phytopath.17: 247–253. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Roemer, T. Gibt es biologische Typen com Steinbrand (Tilletia tritici) des Weizens? Kühn-Archiv19: 1–10. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rudorf, W., And Job, M. Untersuchungen bezüglich der Spezialisierung vonPuccinia graminis tritici, Puccinia triticina undPuccinia glumarum tritici, sowie über Resistenz und ihre Vererbung in verschiedenen Kreuzungen. Zeits. für Züchtung19: 333–365. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sampson, K. Some infection experiments with loose and covered smuts of oats which indicate the existence in them of biological species. Ann. Appl. Biol.12: 314–325. 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. —. The biology of oat smuts. II. Varietal resistance. Ann. Appl. Biol.16: 65–85. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Savulescu, T., And Rayss, T. Contribution à la connaissance des Péronsporacées de Roumanie. Ann. Mycol.28: 297–320. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Scheibe, A. Studien zum Weizenbraunrost,Puce. triticina Erikss. I. Methoden und Ergebnisse bei der Bestimmung seiner Physiologischen Formen (Biotypen). Arb. Biolog. Reichsanst.16: 575–608. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  76. —. Studien zum Weizenbraunrost,Puccinia triticina Erikss. III. Über die geographische Verbreitung der einzelnen physiologischen Formen und Formenkreise in Deutschland und in seinen angrenzenden Gebieten. Arb. Biolog. Reichsanst.18: 55–82. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Schreiber, F. Resistenzzüchtung beiPhaseolus vulgaris. Phytopath. Zeits.4: 415–454. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Stakman, E. C., Christensen, J. J., And Brewbaker, H. E. Physiologic specialization inPuccinia sorghi. Phytopath.18: 345–354. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  79. —,And Levine, M. N. The determination of biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis onTriticum spp. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull.8: 1–10. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  80. ——,And Bailey, D. L. Biologic forms ofPuccinia graminis on varieties ofAvena spp. Jour. Agr. Res.24: 1013–1018. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  81. ——,And Cotter, R. U. Origin of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis through hybridization and mutation. Scient. Agr.10: 707–720. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  82. ———,And Hines, L. Relation of barberry to the origin and persistence of physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 953–969. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  83. —,And Piemeisel, F. J. A new strain ofPuccinia graminis. Phytopath.7: 73. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Tedin, O. Till fragan om havresvartrostens mangformighet i. Sverige. Sverig. Utsadesf. Tidskr.40: 111–114. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Tisdale, W. H., Melchers, L. E., And Clemmer, H. J. Strains of kernel smuts of sorghum,Sphacelotheca sorghi andS. cruenta. Jour. Agr. Res.34: 825–838. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Togashi, K., And Shibasaki, Y. Biometrical and biological studies ofAlbugo Candida (Pers.) O. Kuntze in connection with its specialization. Imp. Coll. Agr. and For., Morioka, Bull.18: 1–88. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Tscholakow, J. W. Ein Beitrag zur physiologischen Spezialisierung des Weizenbraunrostes,Puccinia triticina Erikss. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.19: 407–411. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Tu, C. Physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici in Kwangtung, Southern China. Phytopath.24: 423, 424. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Verwoerd, L. Die fisiologiese vorms vanPuccinia graminis Pers. wat in Suid-Afrika voorkom. S. African Jour. Sci.28: 274–279. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Waterhouse, W. L. A preliminary account of the origin of two new Australian physiologic forms ofPuccinia graminis tritici. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W.54: 96–106. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  91. —. Australian rust studies. I. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W.54: 615–680. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  92. —. On the production in Australia of two new physiologic forms of leaf rust of wheat,Puccinia triticina Erikss. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W.57: 92–94. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Wellensiek, S. J. Oriënteerend onderzoek omterent physiologiese specialistie vanPuccinia triticina Eriks. in Nederland. Tijdschr. over Plantenz.36: 1–12. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Wilhelm, P. Studien zur Spezialisierungsweise des Weizengelbrostes,Puccinia glumarum f. sp.tritici (Schmidt) Erikss. et Henn. und zur Keimungsphysiologie seiner Uredosporen. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.19: 95–133. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Zillig, H. Über spezialisierte Formen beim Antherbrand (Ustilago violacea (Pers.) Fuck.). Centralbl. Bakt., Abt. 2,53: 33–74. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brooklyn Botanic Garden, USA

    George M. Reed

Authors
  1. George M. Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Brooklyn Botanic Garden Contributions No. 71.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, G.M. Physiologic specialization of the parasitic fungi. Bot. Rev 1, 119–137 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872309

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872309

Keywords

Search

Navigation